sayhellohayley

The biggest problem with the election this year is how uneducated every single voter is. Including myself! Half of it is my laziness of not wanting to do any research and the other half is my internal conflict of whom to listen to. The media? The candidates? My own interpretation… Read More

Man. You have a lot of hate in you haha I'm sorry about that. This has been a pretty convoluted conversation and I don't remember what has been said verbatim throughout every response. I believe she was probably abused. So, my statement isn't different from what I have said before.… Read More

That was in response to a different statement. You may interpret it however you wish. My main point is that most of us are thinking with both our heads and hearts and you are only thinking with your head. Which isn't a bad thing, but it also contributes to why you can't/refuse to… Read More

I was talking about the people in our conversation. Not this entire thread.

No one ever said that. I don't think she should be able to perform during the suit. It states in the contract that she can't. So that's that. The whole thing just needs to be dealt with in a more timely manner. If she wins and proves that he did abuse her, she's free of the contract… Read More

Wow. Still going haha I'm not going to argue with you. You are right that it is he said she said at this point. But based on the artists past and all the trouble this case has brought for her, my own opinion is that she is most likely telling the truth. Because I don't know why someone… Read More

You're a very belittling person. The conversation obviously expands beyond that. And as I said before, it's unfortunate that it's taken three years to settle all of this. That's where my sympathy lies. This is a case that probably should have been dealt with much quicker.

My first comment was in response to what you originally said. Which was that she shouldn't have entered a contract if something was going to go wrong and in this situation, that's abuse. (Sexual or otherwise.) As for everything else, it's unfortunate that you don't sympathize to someone's… Read More

Dang dude. I'm not up for name calling. Also, a contract obviously would not state that. That's what one calls a hyperbole. On another note, I never stated that the contract should be void. I guess what I'm saying is that she has a right to be upset that all of this is happening.… Read More

The contract would have been just fine if he had not abused her. So your point is somewhat moot.