Are My Opinions About "Harry Potter" Right Or Wrong?

Hermione should've just gone it alone. There, I said it.

1. Harry Potter was absolutely useless, let's just start there.

Warner Bros

Like, honestly in the history of heroes Harry has to be the least qualified. OK, he's brave, but honestly he just gets the gang into more trouble and it's a wonder he managed to survive the whole seven books.

2. In fact, Ron was absolutely useless too.

Warner Bros

Harry and Ron make such good friends because they're each as useless as the other. Voldemort should honestly be ashamed of himself for not being able to beat these two dummies.

3. Hermione could probably have saved the wizarding world on her own – the boys were just slowing her down.

Warner Bros

This is a formal request to J.K. Rowling to rewrite the books with Hermione Granger, and Hermione Granger only. The series would be two books long because Hermione would GET. SHIT. DONE.

4. Dumbledore was basically no help to anybody.

Warner Bros

The man spoke in so many riddles, I'm surprised his patronus wasn't a sphinx. Why didn't he just sit them all down and say, "Look guys, my time is probably gonna be up soon, so here's what you need to know about the Deathly Hallows"? No, instead he just drew a symbol in a goddamn book and let them work it out alone.

5. Snape was a bad man who was just doing what he had to do to save his own skin, which didn't even work out in the end.

Warner Bros

You can argue that Snape was actually good, but I'm not listening.

6. Bellatrix was actually worse than Voldemort.

Warner Bros

Admittedly it's a close call, but in my opinion Bellatrix is probably worse than Voldy. Whereas I think Voldemort thinks about his plans a little more, Bellatrix will just steam in and kill everybody.

7. Gryffindors are actually the worst – that's just a fact.

Warner Bros

They like to think they're better than everybody else and, tbh, they're probably out here causing more trouble than any other house.

8. J.K. Rowling didn't have to kill BOTH Lupin and Tonks. That was out of order (excuse the pun).

Warner Bros

Honestly, someone must've just put Jo in a bad mood because WTF? She could've just killed one of them off. :(

9. Fred didn't need to die either, but one of the main three probably should've.

Warner Bros

Fred was a low blow. HOW DARE YOU, JOANNE ROWLING? But also, it just seems unlikely that with everybody dying around them, Harry, Ron, and Hermione (who are younger and less skilled than many who died) managed to survive the onslaught. I'm not saying I wanted one of them to die, I just thought maybe Ron would get bumped off.

10. Harry and Ginny should never have been a couple in the first place.

Warner Bros

OK, Harry, so you're just going to go around kissing your best friend's sister? I know things are hard, but come on.

11. And tbh, Ron doesn't deserve Hermione, so they shouldn't be together either, sorry.

Warner Bros

Ron wasn't very nice to Hermione at the beginning and tbh she should've have even given him the time of day. She deserves much better.

12. The couple who should've been, though? HARRY AND DRACO AND YOU CAN'T TELL ME OTHERWISE.

Warner Bros

Yes OK, this is probably the wildest opinion I have, but the fanfics on this relationship are too good. They were just mean to each other because deep down they wanted to bone, I know it.

13. And finally, let's all end as friends and with the same opinion: The books are better than the movies. We can agree on that, right?

Warner Bros

It's a fact, surely.