Why The Sun’s Front Page About Mental Health Is Completely Wrong

“Mental patients” and people with symptoms of mental illness are not the same thing.

The story quotes an academic report - the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness, produced by the Centre for Mental Health and Risk at the University of Manchester. (As such, it’s not so much an “exclusive investigation”, more “reading a report on the internet that was published in July”.)

3. The article says that the figure refers to “high-risk patients” who were “allowed to kill” by “failings in Britain’s mental health system”:

The University of Manchester study, which you can read here (PDF), does include the figure of 1,216 people who were victims of homicide (which covers both murder and manslaughter) - as you can see in this table:

But - as it says in a paragraph directly above the table that The Sun quotes - this figure includes both people who were “patients” (definied elsewhere in the report as those that had “been in contact with mental health services in the 12 months prior to the offence”), and those who simply “showed an abnormal mental state at the time of the homicide”.

In other words, this figure explicitly includes people who were not patients at all, never mind the “high-risk” patients that The Sun claims.

7. The report is completely unambiguous about this:

It clearly states that “we do not know if these symptoms led directly to the homicide”, and “most were not preventable by mental health services”. 1 in 4 people in the UK will suffer from some form of mental health issue in their lifetime. The definition includes people suffering from depression - something that affects between 8% and 12% of the population in any given year.

The report doesn’t break down the number of victims into those who were killed by “patients” and those killed by people with “mental illness” - and in any case, there is some overlap between those groups - but it does break down the number of perpetrators:

In other words, almost half of those who committed the homicides that made up The Sun’s 1,200 figure were not “mental patients”, their illness cannot be shown to have caused the homicide, and for most of that group, the mental health system could have done nothing to prevent the death.

And even those that were classed as “patients” were not necessarily “high-risk” patients, as The Sun claimed - just anybody who had contact with the mental health system in the previous year. According to Paul Farmer, the Chief Executive of the mental health charity Mind, that’s a figure of around 1.2million people.

We have asked the University of Manchester for a comment on The Sun’s use of their research, and will update this article if they respond.

14. Seperately, the heads of three leading mental health organisations - Mind, Rethink Mental Illness and Time To Change - issued a statement criticising The Sun’s article:


It’s incredibly disappointing to see a leading newspaper splash with such a sensational and damaging headline.

…There are 1.2 million people using secondary mental health services – the vast majority of whom pose no threat to anyone. And in reality, people with mental health problems are more likely to be victims of crime than the general population.

This headline, which will be seen by millions of people today, creates a completely false picture which will only fuel the stigma and prevent more people from seeking help and support when they need it, including when they are in crisis.

15. As Professor Appleby says, the trend for homicides by both patients and those with symptoms of mental illness has been down in recent years:

The Sun’s report also fails to mention another key figure in the Manchester study: in the same period that 738 mental health patients committed homicides, 13,469 patients committed suicide.

18. Update, October 23: A little over two weeks later, The Sun has published a clarification, in which they tacitly admit their mistake.

The Time To Change campaign described their meeting with The Sun’s editor as “constructive”, but added that “what’s more important is how they continue to cover these issues in future.”

Check out more articles on BuzzFeed.com!

          
    Now Buzzing