falconf
SHARE THIS PAGE View Viral Dashboard ›
    • falconf

      You mean the science article you failed to read? don’t worrry I’ll post the same response to one of your other uneducated posts. I don’t think you read even the abstract. Don’t worry I read the thing for you and I’ll skip to the conclusion, as a matter of fact I have given you some highlights:

      “Anaphylactic reactions to several vaccines are likely caused by the presence of components introduced during manufacturing, such as egg protein, milk protein, or gelatin.”

      “The committee does want to emphasize many of the adverse events examined are exceedingly rare in the population overall, and in most instances any particular adverse event, be it arthritis, meningitis, or any of the other vaccine–adverse events that the committee considered, are not preceded by immunization. The committee chose cautious and scientific language for our conclusions, because, especially with rare events, it is not possible to prove a negative (i.e., the vaccine did not and cannot cause the event). The committee cannot say that in a certain person at a certain time, some event cannot happen; there is much about biology that is not known.”

      “The committee concluded the evidence favors rejection of five vaccine–adverse event relationships.”

      Yeah, it seems you are too stupid to read and understand them. You tried though and that was real cute. You can try again tomorrow.

    • falconf

      I don’t think you read even the abstract. Don’t worry I read the thing for you and I’ll skip to the conclusion, as a matter of fact I have given you some highlights: “Anaphylactic reactions to several vaccines are likely caused by the presence of components introduced during manufacturing, such as egg protein, milk protein, or gelatin.” The committee does want to emphasize many of the adverse events examined are exceedingly rare in the population overall, and in most instances any particular adverse event, be it arthritis, meningitis, or any of the other vaccine–adverse events that the committee considered, are not preceded by immunization. The committee chose cautious and scientific language for our conclusions, because, especially with rare events, it is not possible to prove a negative (i.e., the vaccine did not and cannot cause the event). The committee cannot say that in a certain person at a certain time, some event cannot happen; there is much about biology that is not known.” “The committee concluded the evidence favors rejection of five vaccine–adverse event relationships.”  Yeah, it seems you are too stupid to read and understand them. You tried though and that was real cute. You can try again tomorrow.