to be fair, jesus wasn’t a white guy with doey eyes (I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt on the flowing brown locks)
to be fair, jesus wasn’t a white guy with doey eyes (I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt on the flowing brown locks)
Medical ethics have not always made testing on humans taboo or illegal. A great deal of progress in medicine has come about via human test subjects, including the smallpox vaccine. Another staple of modern medical research and practice is the use of human corpses, which has a long history of being illegal and taboo (the latter still persisting today). So is testing on animals really they key to driving medical progress? Dubious. Even if so, does the end justify the means? Clearly someone didn’t think so in the cases of human experimentation that have driven medical progress for the majority of its history. Plus animals can’t sue.
can we talk about how much of a dreamboat Gael García Bernal is instead?
I mean, if you personally don’t want to put in the effort, what can we expect on your part?
Oh wait, you’re right. Nothing can and ever has changed since biblical times. I forgot.
Can we stop shaming sex workers now? thanks.
ed adnser, you classy mothafucka
While you’re not quite on point with respect to the the derivation of “mull,” the Romans and Greeks mixed their wine with water. They’d call you barbaric and uncivilized for drinking unmixed wine for non medicinal purposes.
tip on mulled wine: put your small spices you’d rather not ingest, like cloves, in loose tea bags or a mesh tea strainer :)
way to go there, durex china.