The Top 7 Most FacePalm-atarians Alive!

Yes, another one! Gotta love the celebritarian cult personality over the last few days! Nothing says individualsism and wanting no rulers only by replacing politicians with celebrities instead. Like many of the other kiss assing lists, another list has been made but it was decided to be 7 instead of 20 or 10. Nothing says how awesome you are than an even more exclusive list. Some of these names you may have seen, some haven't, but nonetheless it was felt that the other articles didn't brown nose the other libertarians so more was added to this one. So here it is, the Top 7 libertarians that warrant a facepalm more than any other libertarian alive.

How are you not a cartoon character?

Coming in at # 7 we have Gina Lutrell. Most notably known for her contributions to the site Thoughts on Liberty which publishes any material related to [enter demographic that is perceived to be discriminated against here]-ism. While she isn't busy ending the patriarchy, Gina is also advocating libertarian cases for the social democratic welfare state and asserting that Marx was just "misunderstood".

Careful though, don't let her find out you liked the movie Godzilla. Wouldn't want to be a bigoted misogynist, would you?

If Opie Taylor had fallen from the ugly tree....

Coming in at #6 we have THE Dan Bier. This obvious weightlifter has been on the libertarian scene since back in the days of working at Reason magazine, where he now works at.... oh, who cares? I am sure he would be humble enough to mention it in every other sentence. When he isn't being super humble, or overly bashing ("The lady doth protest too much, methinks") about guys who boast about not sexually assaulting women (thus boasting himself), this celebritarian runs the FB page and blog the Skeptical Libertarian, which ironically is skeptical about everything except the State.

On top of the Skeptical Libertarian, he's made a name for himself by doing nothing but criticizing big name libertarians all the while making no contributions of his own.

Then there's the "science" charade, which is nothing more than accepting whenever the mainstream tells you at face value. Doesn't matter if you disagree, he never tires of being the smartest person in the room, and he will be sure that you know it too.

Never play a drinking game to her logical fallacies.

Coming in at #5 we have Sharon Presley. This libertarian has been on the scene since.... Well, I think she invented libertarianism. At least I think that is the case since she never fails to mention how long she has been libertarian despite any substantive argument that is raised against her. If I had known that was a valid rebuttal I would have been using it centuries ago. Unfortunately I am not that old.

Anyway, she has a social psychology degree. When she isn't calling libertarians scum for being critical of people who aren't her, Sharon spends her time with the ALF and advocating for the super libertarian concept of Land Value Taxes.

Don't you dare and try to dismiss her bringing up her social psycjology major as not being a valid argument versus her not addressing the argument itself. She has plenty of friends that can confirm her bias, you scum!

Did I mention she has a social psychology degree?

Can you still be a liberal and a libertarian?

Moving along to #4 we have Erin Lahman. Erin has made no contributions to libertarianism, but don't let that stop this state employed "anarchist" call everyone that disagrees with her a hipstertarian which is not ironic at all. When this SJW isn't bashing the Mises Institute, she spends her time calling other libertarians racist apologists, advocating "libertarian" principles such as arguments for "social justice" and positive rights, and.... that's it. This libertarian wants to improve libertarianism by bringing in new perspectives, regardless if they are right or not.

After all, in this day and age where anyone is a libertarian, it's not about libertarianism being right, it is about it being morphed into something where it is no longer libertarianism.

#SoBrave

We are narrowing down our candidates.... On to #3 we have Chet Lake. Chet has made a name for himself by sucking up to all the SJW celebritarians. When he isn't shaming his wife for having an eating disorder and making it up by sucking up to "libertarian" feminists who make fake apologies by calling them brave, Chet runs the FB page Liberty's Realist where he kisses Nozicks ass, reveals his ignorance on anarcho-capitalisim by regurgitating every strawman about anarcho-capitalism that there is, and asserts that replacing one welfare scheme with another is somehow libertarian.

Somewhere in the world, Michael Jackson and Skeletor are without their love child.

Almost there! Next at #2 we have George Geanasldnalffhafhdfbcvmnbkoplis. George does..... hmmmm..... anyone know? He runs a FB group named Anarcho-Capitalism, which pretty much talks about everything but anarcho-capitalism except for how bigoted they all apparently are. Oh, and he wrote *a* article on Liberty.me strawmanning meanies. And, that's it.

George is a real hero. When he is not not leaving his house, George is busy on the witch hunt for any alleged racists.

Criteria for being racist by George's standards are:

-Disagreeing with him.

-Not saying "by the way, racism is wrong" after every statement, regardless if it is on topic or not.

-Agreeing with Tom Woods, Hoppe, or Rothbard.

-Agreeing with the NAP

Don't you dare try and debate him though. This brain trust is full of intellectual ammunition.

Flawless arguments include:

-"Hahahahahaha"

-"Tl;dr"

-Calling you butthurt/racist/derogatory term

-Calling you an armchair scholar (despite never leaving his house which is obvious by all the photos of him in the same room with the same webcam)

Define "define". *hairflip*

And the moment you have all been waiting for.... Who else did you expect? We have none other than Cathy Reisenwitz.

Cathy Reisenwitz began her "intellectual" climb to fame from the YouTube webisodes of The Libertarienne where she decided to go her own way. Don't ever mention to her that she made the claim after leaving that she cares more about fame than libertarianism though (shhhhhh! That's a secret!)

After leaving the show, she has written for Forbes, FEE, and others. In case you really want to know, just check out her wall on Facebook, she humble-brags about it constantly.

Cathy is a self proclaimed libertarian feminist where one of her major goals is ending "privilege" or having others check theirs and "improving" (changing) libertarianism.

When Cathy isn't making others feel guilty or writing 1600 word exhausting tomes of articles, she is known for her major contributions such as:

-Calling bitcoin "white privilege"/racist

-Bashing prominent libertarians for writing anti-black material with no evidence only to make half-assed apologies later.

-Claiming that shaming is unjustifiable coercion, equivalent to state coercion, which she contradicts every day by "coercing" others.

-Asserting that if you are a woman and aren't a victim that you are wrong or have never done anything with your life only later to say she never spoke for all women.

-Saying that racism is endemic in our culture and everyone is racist, making the term meaningless on top of the argument not making sense.

-Thinking that words have meanings, then changing her stance minutes later that words don't have meaning.

-Stating conservatism is incompatible with advocating for rape victims.

-When asked to back up evidence that police abuse sex workers more than clients, presents anecdotes as evidence. (Said anecdotes are not even recorded.)

-Claims women shy away from open source technologies because of the men involved despite the fact that the technologies are open source and men are not required to use them.

-When discussing a set of data related to rape, is told that unreported rapes is accounted for in the data, which she didn't seem to understand when she mentioned unreported rapes. Then says there's more to rape culture than people actually getting raped.

The list may as well be endless. Like any intellect, Cathy has irrefutable arguments to back up her claims. And by "irrefutable" I mean:

-Asking you to define the clear and explicit terms that she uses for her.

-Not answering at all.

-Not being put in a position to defend herself or be challenged.

-Having her legion of white knights and acolytes argue for her, only for her to take their position as her own.

Cathy has made word that she is writing a book in the near future. I didn't know one can write a book and fill the pages with nothing but how everyone else is racist but her and checking privilege.

That's all folks. The decisions were hard, but the jury is in. These libertarians were voted the ones most worthy of face palming on a daily basis.

inb4 "haters gonna hate" and something something doing something right.