back to top

The Government Accidentally Gave Journalists Documents About A "National Security" Matter

“This case is about letting the public see how the government's asylum seeker policies are really working.”

Posted on

The Australian government is vocal about its promise to “stop the boats” but a landmark case has shed light on how the details of asylum seeker boat turnbacks have been kept under wraps due to “national security”.

Lakruwan Wanniarachchi / AFP / Getty Images

Sri Lankan naval vessel the Samudra (L) is anchored after transfering 41 would-be asylum seekers whose boat was turned away by Australia at the southern port of Galle on July 7, 2014 .

On Monday, moments into a court case on the government's refusal to hand over information to journalists on "national security" grounds, solicitors representing the Immigration Department inadvertently handed documents about the turnbacks to Guardian Australia.

Solicitor Justin Davidson admitted black lines designed to censor certain information had not been placed where they should have been, leaving details unredacted.

Major General Andrew Bottrell then testified as the Immigration Department’s sole witness in a case initiated by an Australian journalist who asked for more information about boat turnbacks under the Freedom of Information Act last year.

Bottrell heads up Operation Sovereign Borders, which is aimed at stopping maritime arrivals of asylum seekers to Australia.


Guardian Australia journalist Paul Farrell initiated the proceedings in 2014 after the Immigration Department denied him access to details of turnback operations, including ones in which Australia illegally entered Indonesian waters.

“The Australian government can't just claim national security over whatever it wants,” Farrell told BuzzFeed News. “Political secrecy and national security are two entirely different things."

A succession of immigration ministers and maritime personnel have long refused to comment on "operational" or "on-water" matters, but Farrell's barrister pushed the point that "national security" was not relevant for operations that were unlawful and the government's incursions into Indonesian waters, which were covered in some of these logs, were unlawful in his view.

Under cross-examination Bottrell, criticised Farrell’s coverage for “broadcasting” information about Operation Sovereign Borders to people smugglers.

Extraordinary: Major general Andrew Bottrell gives evidence in FOI case that my report on Indonesian incursions damaged national security

"This case is about letting the public see how the government's asylum seeker policies are really working," Farrell said.

The hearing will continue on Tuesday.

Gina Rushton is a breaking news reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in Sydney.

Contact Gina Rushton at

Got a confidential tip? Submit it here.