What a crock… you guys use data from the last 10 years and then somehow label teams that have been around 1 year in the FBS as dirty? All it takes is one game where the two teams get into shoving matches and your so-called stats are completely skewed. How can you call out a UTSA team that only has 1 year of stats and then make some veiled reference to The University of Miami. Hack journalism at its best. Did someone from Texas beat you guys up or something? LOL PLUS, the rules have gotten MUCH stricter in the last few years, the few years that coincidentally the new FBS teams have played. That, coupled with the smaller data set is much more likely the reason the new teams are at the top of your list than some retaliatory move by “physically outclassed” players. This article is a joke.