I think it would have been neat to have Merida, Mulan (who is not really a princess I know) and Repunzel :-)

Stop bitching about cartoons how fucking real do you want them to be? They are just cartoons.

if this is “historically accurate” why isn’t Pocahontas a little naked bald girl, and why isn’t Jasmine Chinese?  I’m not really sure what to say about Ariel..
The others are rather pretty though.

Okay, despite everyone’s obsession with the potential discrepancy of the headline (possibly not historically accurate? Oh noes!), the redesigns of these characters are phenomenal and the art is incredible. I’m glad to see this gallery.

Shouldn’t historically-accurate Pocahontas be about 12?

i like it… but a before/after would’ve helped - who really remembers the clothing details

Also, women went about their business with their eyes shut.

They’re not in the kitchen! This isn’t accurate at all.

No.5 is actually 19th century porn.

I don’t get this…they look exactly the same.

That is why I put the modifier more historically accurate. I love how serious the internet is.

Uh yeah. Everyone knows the native ladies were totes into the one shoulder halters at that time. :eye roll:

These are beautiful, but they’re not historically accurate. Considering Pocahontas is an actual historical figure, I’m surprised by the depiction. In case anyone is curious, NOVA has a pretty interesting timeline of notable Pocahontas imagery here, including the only known image of her drawn from life.

But they’re not anatomically accurate.

This looks like it’s done according to country and time era. Cinderella and Snow white are my favorites.

Just a slight twist on the clothing most of them already wore in the cartoons.

I’m assuming it’s historically accurate costumes for whatever period they seem to be in >.> Either way, who doesn’t love Disney Princesses in different clothes?

Is the last one supposed to be Ariel? Am I to believe that poofy-sleeved gowns are historically what mermaids have worn?

love this