the “FAIL BLOG of CANADA”?
it's what we pay faces for, eh? Either they're good at turning blah blah blah into “THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING!” or it's just blah blah blah…

I hate Faux 'News' and their affiliated properties as much as anyone, but the “Define, please.” was likely a request to the producer in her ear.  The Male reporter trying to catch up on the Chrysler stay was pathetic though—he could have easily covered for his cluelessness by doing background on the situation. “Fiat, Chrysler, B/K, blah, blah, blah”

I thought it was bad enough that she asked the first correspondent to define a very self explanatory bit about apple…then she throws around a breaking news headline heheh to be fair, Fox has done far worse by slandering people than their actual incompetence in the newsroom.

This post is full of fail. Try again maybe?

It looks like they were trying to report the story almost immediately as it came off the wire. As such, it seems excusable for any one of those correspondents to not have a clue what was going on — seeing as how they were staged in their chairs with their make-up done and ready to go on to talk about the markets at the closing. But what's inexcusable is the decision of the person in charge who told the lead anchor to run with the story and to toss it to a reporter who clearly didn't have a clue what she was talking about. All in all, this doesn't show the Fox Business Channel to be a less competent outlet than competitors such as CNBC… only that one person got a little over-zealous in the rush to break the news of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's order. The result is (understandably) clueless reporters who have had no chance to read the story they're being told to report.

“When you want to get your news from people more clueless than you, Fox news channel”