Mary Neil Traunter's piece "Doing Gender, Doing Class: The Performance of Sexuality in Exotic Dance Clubs" was a study done by Traunter herself on strip clubs. Traunter went to four different strip clubs divided into two classes: middle class and working class. Traunter mostly focused on embodying the customer experience, however, the dancers were still studied as well. In the piece one of Traunter's focuses was the differences between the two clubs when it came to the dancers. The middle class clubs were known for their blonde, big breasted, young, Caucasian women; while the working class clubs consisted of minorities of African-American and Latino. The different performances and standards of the women were studied. In the middle class clubs the strippers went on to say how they keep up with their beauty because they cared for their body image. These dancers were also very small in weight. The women described how they focus their makeup on the eyes because they seduce when performing. At the middle class clubs their customers were mostly rich business men, had nice relaxing couches, and even a business wear dress code. The dancers were known to mostly perform in snotty ways. They pranced around on stage and look deep into customers' eyes while on stage. On the other hand in the working class clubs it was noted that their make up was focused on their mouth insinuating more of a sexual experience. Also the dancers varied in shape, size, and even age. The working class women performed very sexually and hands on with the customers. Traunter classified the middle class performances as "voyeuristic sexuality" and the working class' performances as "cheap thrills". It was noted that the strip clubs are separated by social class. The reader is lead to think about how race and class played a factor in this. Focusing on African-American women , who found their place in working class clubs, they were pictured inferior to the middle class in design of the clubs, the clientele, and Traunter's description of "cheap thrill". The label in itself is not very pleasing. Is it okay that this separation was created. Social class was putting black women (along with Latinos) in negative stigmatisms. Social class is commonly not controlled. Birth, economic, and even race can automatically determine your class. Black women were being labeled with "cheap thrill" while doing the same job as a white women. Traunter reported that the prices in the clubs had very little difference. Admission was only a dollar difference between the clubs. Traunter concludes by saying that when women and men perform sexuality and gender they also are constructing social class. We all know that race can play a part in class. This raises the question of why was the black women given the negative identity. In a Youtube web series Power of the Pussy (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdauyFhjaz0), the women in the series do not see themselves of cheap thrills. the women make a differentiation between a stripper and a performer. They define a performer as knowing pole tricks and giving a show to the customers. Contrary to Traunter's piece, the middle class dancers would not even be considered performers by these women standards but just strippers. Some dancers in the video are even business owners. It can be assumed that the description "cheap thrill" would not be liked by the Magic City Club dancers. The identity of being the cheap dancer was not chosen, however, based on the Youtube video the identity of a performer was chosen by African-American dancers. The choice of an identity is very important. When an identity is not chosen it is often unclear of what that specific, in this case, race and gender really is. The clarity is missing because it is not coming from the inside. The identity chosen here is different from the sexual object society chose, it's one more professional of a performer.