orion33
SHARE THIS PAGE View Viral Dashboard ›
    • orion33

      What about incest? Do you think that’s ok too? Or do you think that’s abnormal, but homosexuality isn’t. But it’s obvious you didn’t make it past kindergarten judging from your primitive reasoning and poor reading comprehension. Were your parents related by any chance? One day they’ll rewrite the laws on contracts so that if the animal or child doesn’t run away, then it’s consensual. And you’d be fine with that, you can’t justify it other than saying “that’s what the law says, aha! ha!”
      Yet you’ll stand up and say the law is wrong on gay marriage. You’re a bunch of illogical hypocrites. And as for the other guy, single parents often raise psychotic children. Hitler’s mother was a single parent. But it’s ok to disregard facts and reality, because you want to live in a delusion.

    • orion33

      Adoptive parents of heterosexual orientation would be far better than gay adoptive parents, you need the COMPLEMENTARY INFLUENCES of both genders upon the child. Most children would choose to have a mom and a dad instead of two mommies or two daddies. I have no problem with adoption, but it is less desirable than creating your own child. If the couple is fertile, but chooses to adopt a child, that’s a bit odd… Sorry, but my DNA is special, yours most likely isn’t though!

    • orion33

      1. You still don’t understand, you are changing the definition of a concept, while it is still ‘consenting adults’ for now, why stop there? Lets expand marriage to include every fetish imaginable. 2. No, I use it to describe braindead people who harp on about ‘equality’ as any excuse to get what they want, like spoiled children. 3. Well you’re clearly gender confused since your name is ‘ROBERTSsim’. Really? should they have that right, when it means 96% of the public has to cope with this arrangement? Civil union is all that is neccesary, if you want the ‘marriage’ title, that is just sheer vanity, but not surprising considering gay people are all about image, not about substance. 4. Infertile couples are infertile out of circumstance, homosexual couples cannot reproduce out of principle. It is not equivalent, stop using poor arguments. 5. There are animals born without legs, is that normal too? Is that how nature intended them to be formed? Yes, homosexuality has always been around, I have no problem with homosexuals if you keep it to yourself, but to say it’s normal is crazy, and it has never been acceptable to the mainstream, if it does, then the species is doomed. Yes, one night stands have a brief period of passion. No rape does not count because the passion is not mutual. But how a homosexual couple manages to have a couple that shares their genes without resorting to something unnatural like cloning is beyond me.
      If your kid does have your genes, it’s not yours. It’s not the same as going to a clinic and ‘buying’ one off a surrogate. You’ve made many assumptions about me, but they’ve all been wrong, try again. Nature wins in the end.

    • orion33

      “Oh MAAAAAAAAN is that “human on human = human on animal” argument ever getting OLLLLLD. It’s funny how they think it works, though. (Tip: It’s so much easier to love love than to hate love.)” So you say marriage has to be ‘human on human’
      So when do we legalise pedophilia according to you? Who are you to deny NAMBLA’s lusts?
      Just having ‘love’ is not enough to justify it, and there is a reason to hate NAMBLA and pedophiles, unlike you braindead hippies who want the world to be ‘equal’ and ‘loving’. THIS IS WHY DEFINITIONS ARE IMPORTANT, AND CHANGING THEM IS A BAD IDEA. Gay marriage is a bad idea, it is slowly eroding society.

    • orion33

      1. You say animals/children/inanimate objects cannot legally enter marriage. You’re right, they can’t, for now… but what if we change the laws to allow it? The same way you want them changed to allow gay marriage? Don’t you see how this is setting the precedent for bending over to everyone’s fetishes?
      What about polygamy? It’s funny how everyone is for gay marriage, but not for polygamy, if I have 10 women I want to marry, why am I prevented? Oh right, it’s not fashionable and is ‘degrading’ to women. You’re all a bunch of hypocrites. 2. Stop throwing ‘equality’ around like a communist. Needs trump wants, anything that undermines the fabric of society is not what society needs. My children are not confused, but I see a lot of boys who think they’re girls and girls who think they’re guys, that will grow into a bigger problem over time if allowed unchecked. 3. Why do you need to call it marriage? I’m happy enough for you to have civil unions, but why do you have to drag marriage into this? Is it just so you can say ‘my husband’? That’s a little bit silly, is all this crying worth it? 4. Only using a surrogate, and even then it is veiled child thievery. There’s a reason why you need a male and female to reproduce, that is the natural and normal order for mammals. 5. It is my business when you try to change the definition of concepts to dilute their meaning and make them ‘equal’, it would be like saying ‘oranges are lemons because they are both citrus fruits’. It is my business when you parade homosexuality as normal, when it goes against nature. It is my business when you whine about gay marriage day after day because we have to put up with it. I have no problem with interracial relationships, male and women are meant to reproduce. What annoys me is how he uses this as equivalent to gay marriage to justify it in his half baked argument. You’re right, people can marry and not have children, but those couples have the potential to procreate in principle, since they are male and female, barring any circumstances (circumstances do not change the principle) such as age or disability.
      With gay marriage, there is NO potential of the same genders reproducing at all, unless they bring in a surrogate. That’s a bit like having a child with someone who’s not your wife and then taking that child as your own, it has a hollow, shallow, empty, unpassionate feeling. At least orphans or children born out of wedlock were produced by people who actually felt some passion for eachother.

    • orion33

      “Look, if you’re opposed to beastiality, guess what? I’m fucking a horse, and there’s nothing you can do about it!” Cause that’s why, there are standards. Should we permit anyone with any particular lust to marry what they want? Stretch the definition of marriage until it isn’t marriage at all?  We’ve got enough confused children, it’s bad enough they are told they can choose to be a boy or a girl. There are no real men anymore, they’re all deballed, skinny jean wearing, skrillex listening, losers now. Giving into the weak is what is destroying civilization. I have never seen a group of people cry so hard over something they don’t need. Why do you need gay marriage? You can’t even have kids!
      You’re not being oppressed, you can do what you want at home. GROW UP!
      There’s a million real problems in the world, gay marriage is not one of them.
      We’re getting tired of hearing this nonsense everyday.