leel3
 
SHARE THIS PAGE View Viral Dashboard ›
    • leel3

      Disgusting eh… maybe you should read about the 2nd amendment. It’s different than the rest — it’s got a defined purpose. That purpose is the freedom to defend ourselves; and the right of the people not to have those rights infringed by the government.  If you seriously think taking the rights away from those who are following the law will prevent a massacre again — your logic is horribly flawed.  Kind of like putting an intoxalyzer (drunk ignition interlock) on every car because some idiots drive drunk. All it does is make sure that someone can blow into a tube that isn’t drunk.  Do i feel for this man — yes, I have a 9 yr old. Would i want change — sure — but; the route to fixing this problem has nothing to do with the guns, the capacity, or any of that. It has to do with psychopaths who roam freely in our society. Tighten down the mental health checks. Tie them to SS#’s — there are already background checks done with each gun sale and transfer.  The people proposing this stuff have NEVER bought a gun!  Look into it…  Sounds to me, like your part of the problem rather than the solution.

    • leel3

      The right to protect my life, and those of my family is the most important. It’s the only thing someone can take that I cannot replace. It’s the idiots that need sorting through — we’ve been skating mental health issues for several decades now; and now the mentally challenged are breeding this new spawn of idiot.  If someone “Needs” to inflict as much death as possible as quickly as possible, they will do so — google “Timothy McVeigh”.  Meanwhile; if you don’t want to utilize your 2nd amendment rights — be a victim. Don’t tread on me, or my constitutional rights.

    • leel3

      The 2nd amendment is the ONLY amendmenent that has a defined purpose. As far as the “Well regulated” part — the people aren’t to be regulated, the Militia is. As far as this guy — i feel horible about his situation and can appreciate his aptitude and desire to change — and he’s got some good points; but — it wouldn’t have mattered if he used an AR-15, or a 2 shot derringer… He could have used anything; bow and arrow, etc. the victims were all 100% un-armed. Do some research on how many shootings have occured in “gun free zones” for this reason.

    • leel3

      Feeling save and BEING safe are entirely different. As for your “Gun nuts” — the 2nd amendment is what sets America apart from other countries. Ask those in England, Australia, and China how their gun restrictions have gone. In fact; the Bobbies in London never NEEDED to carry guns until AFTER they banned guns!!! Our founding fathers knew forthright what they needed to include, as they just conquered the maniacal regime restricting them from these rights in the first place! It is our right to defend the gift of life — be it our own, or our families — from any evil that may wish to harm it. If you wish to excercise your right to defend yourself, or not — is up to you. Don’t speak for those who don’t rely on others for our own safety. Furthermore; DON’T TREAD ON ME or MY RIGHTS.  Do us a favor - Call your local police department and ask them what their AVERAGE response time is.  Also; The police are armed for THEIR protection; not yours. Very common misconception amongst the public.  PS: I bet the response time isn’t what you expect.