Nobody. But people don’t have the same reaction if they glance at the nutrition facts of their tea and see 90 calories vs. 240 cals.

LOL

Yes, they do. The thing about satire is that it should make fun of abusers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satire), not victims. In this case, it would have been totally fine if they had made fun of Chris Brown’s violent actions without also shaming, ridiculing and naming his victim. The Onion writers are smart, they could have figured out a way to do this without much trouble.

Maybe it’s some people just don’t understand what satire is and lack basic google skills. From Wikipedia “Satire is a genre of literature, and sometimes graphic and performing arts, in which vices, follies, abuses, and shortcomings are held up to ridicule, ideally with the intent of shaming individuals, and society itself, into improvement. Although satire is usually meant to be funny, its greater purpose is often constructive social criticism, using wit as a weapon.”

Because it’s the whole boy’s head, but his nose is tiny and his mouth is barely visible since he is looking to the left. The part of the father’s face that you can see is his nose and mouth. There’s a visible line where the kid’s face ends and the mouth of the father begins.

Because the people on this side of the mirror are having fun with the heads of people on the other side of the table.

Are you saying you don’t find it hilarious to make fun of POC and say they don’t speak English? So edgy!
Yeah, it wasn’t funny.

Oh, come on! They’re not models, they’re good musicians that look fine. It’s o.k. to say good things about them and their looks.

Ha! And it says No. 1 instead of No. 7, and apparently 40cl 70% Vol. instead of 70cl 40% Vol. That’s cool. I’m sure that’s a Luois Vouitonn bag and she’s wearing Niike shoes.

Wat?