The Wrong Definition Of “Literally” Is Literally Going In The Dictionary

This is figuratively the worst thing ever.

I know, right? Now tell your friends!
The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" Is Lit...
Jessica Misener

1. “Literally” technically means “without exaggeration,” as in “this thing ACTUALLY happened.”

2. But these days some people use it just for emphasis.

3. Which is WRONG. Unless you actually IRL exploded.

Source: 

4. Also kind of wrong:

Source: 

6. This annoys a lot of people.

Source: snorgtees.com

7. But since more and more people are using the wrong “literally,” dictionaries are starting to add the wrong definition to their entries for “literally.”

Like the Oxford Dictionary.

8. And even Webster’s.

9. And even Google!!

10. Is this a brave new world where we can use “literally” as a mere intensifier?

Source: 

11. Or should we try to keep “literally” literally the same?

Thanks to GalleyCat and Reddit for pointing this out.

Check out more articles on BuzzFeed.com!

Facebook Conversations

          

    39 Responses So Far

    • ashleym29 thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Win  about 4 days ago
    • Broomhilda thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is OMG  about 6 days ago
    • madelineelizabethjayb   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I...  about a week ago
    • Rod Davis thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail & WTF  about a week ago
    • anyone who misinterperets the factual usage or misdefines or otherwise misrepresents the word “literally” into a definiton other than the ‘real’ one meaning ‘actually’ or ‘in a literal, or real sense’; may as well be trying to do the same thing as bastardizing the necessary and cornerstone concreteness of such constructs in the English language as “singular” and change that definition to mean ‘plural’ or ‘multiplicative’. What I’m stating, is that distorting, or warping the concrete definition of cornerstone or keystone constructs of the language such as “literally” or “singular” or “plural” or “fact” or “fiction” or the hogwash when people confuse “idea” with the completely seperate word (and concept) “ideal” it can (and eventually will) cause the whole house of cards (or scaffolding propping up) this language to fall down and come flying apart at the seams. “truly”.

    • oliverjdarling   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I...  about 2 weeks ago
    • oliverjdarling 2 weeks ago

      It’s nice that everyone’s upset about this, but pretty much every other language has intensifier words. For example, German has words like “doch” and “ja” which have no translation into English in most cases. They’re just there to intensify. They’re natural. They communicate a feeling that would otherwise be absent from written language. How else does one intensify things in written English?

      It’s not a wrong definition, just a new one. The modern English pronoun “they” used to be much closer to “he” and over time, that changed. The word “silly” took on new meanings. It’s natural, it’s just that people have had a conservative notion of grammar drummed into your heads since day one. If you truly have a problem with creation and reinterpretation of words, you should not be using words like “google” as a verb, nor should the word “blog” exist in your vocabulary.

      Much love,
      a linguistics major.

    • etchasketch91   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I...  about 4 weeks ago
    • danl21   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I...  about a month ago
    • Jack Crow thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is OMG  about a month ago
    • oldsie   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... and thinks it’s LOL  about a month ago
    • mirandah7 a month ago

      This usage is actually a famous milestone in literature. At the beginning of the great short story The Dead in Dubliners, James Joyce opens with the line “Lily, the caretaker’s daughter, was literally run off her feet.” That’s not true, of course, but it’s the kind of mistaken usage the character Lily might have used. Some Joyce scholars (Hugh Kenner) mark mark this as at least signaling the point when Joyce started altering the voice of the narrator in his fiction to reflect the vocabulary, usage, and knowledge of the characters, with the narrator’s voice shifting as the focus of the narrator moves from character to character. So while literally incorrect, one might say that it is literarily correct.

    • ximevasquezm thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Cool Beans  about a month ago
    • ImABeaker thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is  about a month ago
    • librarianzrock thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail & WTF  about a month ago
    • mherdman   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I...  about a month ago
    • mailpulak thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail  about a month ago
    • fozzen55   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... and thinks it’s Win  about a month ago
    • MatthewBrown446 thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail & LOL  about a month ago
    • sutharkr thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is LOL  about a month ago
    • Reve thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Cool Beans  about a month ago
    • passingcars   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... and thinks it’s & Ew  about 2 months ago
    • charleyc 2 months ago

      This cracks me up. In this thread: people who whip themselves up into tantrums because they don’t know what hyperbole is.

    • InadaptadaSocial thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail & LOL  about 2 months ago
    • xlinzymmm thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is LOL  about 2 months ago
    • Inês Félix thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • Rational Human 2 months ago

      Doing this is wrong for a multitude of reasons. Language should conform to Dictionary definitions, not vice versa. Poor communication causes innumerable problems.

    • annn2 thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • jameslas thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail & WTF  about 2 months ago
    • clarishinett thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is WTF  about 2 months ago
    • nerdynagy thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • Robin Lindsay   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... and thinks it’s Fail  about 2 months ago
    • sdenofrio thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is LOL  about 2 months ago
    • Jasminefiasco thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is LOL  about 2 months ago
    • xenoform thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • marshmallowpeeps thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • w11.zetaboards.com readers just made The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • GuyWhiteyCorngood thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is WTF & Fail  about 2 months ago
    • AvivaH thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is LOL  about 2 months ago
    • medun   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... and thinks it’s LOL  about 2 months ago
    • Monie$$ thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is OMG  about 2 months ago
    • DramaticallyGiles   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I...  about 2 months ago
    • josephb16   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... and thinks it’s WTF & Fail  about 2 months ago
    • freestatemyth thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is LOL  about 2 months ago
    • christiang17 2 months ago

      ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME THE TWO DEFINITIONS OF “LITERALLY” CONTRADICT EACH OTHER THIS IS NOT OKAY THIS IS WHY THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE IS SO HARD TO LEARN

    • krisb13 thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • amandaq2 2 months ago

      Eh, the original meaning was something entirely different, and we’ve been flopping it back and forth ever since. http://www.prdaily.com/Main/Articles/Are_you_misusing_the_word_literally__7578.aspx#

    • 1500espn.com readers just made The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • sunsfever83 thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • Sandafluffoid 2 months ago

      As a linguistic all the butthurt in these comments makes me sad. This kind of change has been happening for millenia to English and every other language. We won’t lose any ability to express ourselves, our language won’t get ‘worse’, it’ll just change. Seriously, this shouldn’t be a thing.

    • faeriebell thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • ellimac21   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I...  about 2 months ago
    • catherinec4 2 months ago

      Honestly, I think that this transformation is part of the evolution of the English language and we should therefore embrace it! It, literally, is not that big of a deal :)

    • laviolaw thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Win  about 2 months ago
    • justins41 thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • annalisab   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I...  about 2 months ago
    • shannern   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I...  about 2 months ago
    • freckles13 thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • kaitlintsmith   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I...  about 2 months ago
    • allimak21 thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is LOL  about 2 months ago
    • johnec 2 months ago

      This is the sad result of our education system. Now the ignorant masses are unknowingly (of course, they are ignorant) using words incorrectly and slowly changing our language until it we will need completely new words to replace ones we had, but that were misused into oblivion. This is assuming we don’t dumb ourselves down to third world status. Literally

    • nopej added Cotton Eye Joe to the mix about 2 months ago
    • newu1334 thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Cute  about 2 months ago
    • annam13   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I...  about 2 months ago
    • bernicepoirierg thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • FayeValentine 2 months ago

      When in Rome.

    • chackattack thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • rebeccamaried thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is LOL  about 2 months ago
    • carlaaalvarado thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • LegendOfBacon   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... and thinks it’s Fail  about 2 months ago
    • stephalica thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • annief4   The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... and thinks it’s WTF & Fail  about 2 months ago
    • slate.com readers just made The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • heleenk thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Win  about 2 months ago
    • fanaca thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is Fail & LOL  about 2 months ago
    • alexismurdochw thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is LOL  about 2 months ago
    • gcs3 2 months ago

      Waa waa waa why don’t you literally cry me a river? Languages evolve. Get over it. Using literally in this manner is a stylistic device to highlight the absurdity of the literal meaning of some expression. It’s commonly used in this manner for a few hundred years I believe. Literally.

    • Benjamin Sapiens thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is LOL  about 2 months ago
    • kouchakudasai thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is WTF  about 2 months ago
    • Kendrick thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is a Poor Decision  about 2 months ago
    • like this matters thinks The Wrong Definition Of "Literally" I... is LOL  about 2 months ago
    • browngirl1 2 months ago

      Fact check: irregardless is not a word. That is all.

    • erictc 2 months ago

      It’s been used both ways in literature for centuries

    • katy the kid 2 months ago

      I heard a lady on the patio talking about a nanny job for an unruly child. She said she “literally ripped his head off.” I called the cops.

    • deaddrift 2 months ago

      “Literally,” welcome to the club of words that also mean their exact opposites. You are not alone. Like cleave, clip, and dust, you’re an autoantonym now. Congratulations!

    • okapimania 2 months ago

      So are people just upset about this because they literally cannot tell from the context when someone is using the term “literally” literally?

    • joe m/ɯ ǝoɾ 2 months ago

      It’s happened before…

    Hot Buzz

    The 35 Best Lucille Bluth Quotes From "Arrested Development"

    lol

    33 Ways Facebook Ruins Your Life

    lol
    Now Buzzing