back to top

We’ve updated our privacy notice and cookie policy. Learn more about cookies, including how to disable them, and find out how we collect your personal data and what we use it for.


Someone Said That Jennifer Lawrence Wasn't Pretty Enough For Something And It Was Fucking Savage

Damn, Debra.

Posted on

Let's discuss some undeniable facts for a moment, shall we?

Now, I'm not talking about this "alternative facts" nonsense, but real, universal truths. For example, death and taxes, 1+1=2, the earth revolves around the sun, we're not worthy of Beyoncé, etc.

Here's another one. FACT: Jennifer Lawrence is a beautiful and talented actress.

Emma Mcintyre / Getty Images

Nope. This is not an opinion up for debate, but just the cold, hard truth that I live my life by. All haters, trolls, and nay-sayers feel free to go elsewhere.

Now, being as amazing as she is, it shouldn't surprise you that J. Law is being considered for the role of Sharon Tate in Quentin Tarantino's next film, which will focus on the infamous Manson family murders.

Hulton Archive / Getty Images

Margot Robbie is also in talks to play the late actress, who was tragically murdered, along with four others, during a home invasion in 1969.


Sharon is survived by her younger sister, Debra Tate, who was recently asked by TMZ who — between Margot and Jennifer — she thought should be cast to play her sister, to which she said:

They're both extremely accomplished actresses, but I would have to say, my pick would be Margot simply because of her physical beauty, and the way she even carries herself is similar to that of Sharon. I don't think as much about Jennifer Lawrence. Not that I have anything against her but she just — I don't know — she's not pretty enough to play Sharon. That's a horrible thing to say, but you know, I have my standards.