back to top

We’ve updated our privacy notice and cookie policy. Learn more about cookies, including how to disable them, and find out how we collect your personal data and what we use it for.

Here's Why People Think Visual Effects In Movies Suck

Your mind is about to be blown.

Posted on

Visual effects artist Freddie Wong and RocketJump Film School make the argument that people notice BAD visual effects only because they stand out. But, in actuality, there is so much beautiful CGI that is so great it gets unnoticed.

View this video on YouTube / Via

For instance, take a look at this scene from Forrest Gump and look how they added in all those people.

RocketJump Film School / Via

Did you notice that when you watched the iconic flick? Probably not, because it was so well done.


Wong also says that artists should stick to the computer's strengths. Like, for instance, "right now computers are great at rendering things," Wong said. Things, like tables, chairs, cars, etc.

Because this probably will push your mind into overdrive... The makers of The Avengers totally re-created the entire New York City skyline for Jeremy Renner to run around like he was on a playground, but it was all shot in front of green screens.

He closes his argument by saying, "Visual effects have always been a part of this art form. And CG is simply a tool on the filmmaker's tool belt to tell a story, but when the end result is bad — maybe it's not the tool's fault..."

An earlier version of this post incorrectly identified Robert Downey Jr. as Jeremy Renner.