"Love, Actually" Wasn't Supposed To Be A Christmas Movie And We Are Shook

    Wait... What?!

    According to Love, Actually director, Richard Curtis, the movie wasn't originally supposed to take place at Christmastime.

    AND I HAVE QUESTIONS.

    First, would Rowan Atkinson be rendered useless?

    What would be the point of the pageant?

    St. Patrick's Day, maybe??

    Why would Sarah and Karl be dancing, if not at a Christmas party?

    Would Jamie have skipped Easter with his family instead?

    Without the opportunity to send a Christmas card, how would the Prime Minister know to go after Natalie?

    Why would Harry give Mia a necklace? Is it her birthday?

    I mean, I guess Sam could've chased Joanna through the airport during the summer...

    ...and it would have been nice for Colin to experience the Midwest in the spring.

    What would Billy Mack have changed the lyrics to???

    If it's not the season for carol-singers, how would Mark convince Juliet to lie to his best friend/her husband?

    Let's be grateful that Richard had a Christmas epiphany because the movie just wouldn't be the same without it.