Skip To Content

    A Former Cash Staffer Is Refusing To Answer Questions About The AWU Raid Leaks

    “I respectfully decline to answer on the grounds it may incriminate me,” he told the court.

    Small business minister Michaelia Cash's former senior media adviser, David De Garis, has refused to answer questions about who told him police planned to raid the Australian Workers' Union offices, on the grounds it may incriminate him.

    De Garis made the declaration during the first day of the AWU’s Federal Court challenge over the 2017 raids on its Sydney and Melbourne offices, which the union says were unlawful and had an "improper political purpose".

    The controversial raids were executed as part of an investigation by the Turnbull government-established watchdog, the Registered Organisations Commission, into donations made by the union over a decade ago when it was led by current Labor leader Bill Shorten.

    Court documents show a magistrate approved the Australian Federal Police’s search warrants at 9:40am on Oct. 24, 2017. When police arrived around 4:30pm, a large media scrum was already gathered outside the union’s offices.

    Cash denied five times her office had had any involvement during a now-infamous Senate estimates exchange on Oct. 25, 2017 before announcing later that evening that De Garis was behind the leak to the media and had resigned.

    Under questioning from the AWU's barrister Herman Borenstein QC on Monday afternoon, De Garis said he first became aware that search warrants were due to be executed "sometime after midday, before 4pm" on Oct. 24, 2017.

    When asked who made him aware of the raids, De Garis told the court he couldn't say.

    “I respectfully decline to answer on the grounds it may incriminate me,” he told the court.

    The majority of the day was spent debating whether De Garis could be asked about his knowledge surrounding the execution of search warrants or if his evidence could be considered parliamentary privilege.

    The ROC's lawyer, Frank Parry QC, said the media leaks were not relevant in determining whether the investigation was politically motivated.

    Justice Mordecai Bromberg said there were reasonable grounds for De Garis to refuse to answer and offered the former staffer a protection certificate, that would prevent his evidence being used against him in any future proceedings in an Australian court.

    De Garis declined and repeated his intention to not self-incriminate.

    Borenstein argued it is unlikely De Garis would be prosecuted, given the commonwealth director of public prosecutions confirmed in January that no charges would be laid for the leaks as there was little chance of a successful prosecution. The AFP subsequently dropped its investigation into the "unauthorised disclosure of government information", which carries a maximum two-year jail term.

    "The underlying theme is there was a keen political interest on the part of the senator in the subject matter of the investigation," Borenstein told the court.

    De Garis's lawyer Jason MacLaurin said he was "just the media officer" and not involved in decision making in Cash's office.

    But Borenstein argued that De Garis was "not low-hanging fruit" but was a "significant person" in the senator's office.

    De Garis agreed with Borenstein when asked if he regarded it part of his role as Cash’s senior adviser to use his media contacts to advance the minister’s political agenda. He said the pair would meet on a daily basis to discuss media, political, and Question Time strategy.

    Justice Bromberg will rule on Tuesday whether the court will compel De Garis to answer.

    The AWU launched its court challenge after BuzzFeed News revealed on Oct. 25, 2017, that Cash’s office had tipped off the media ahead of the raids.

    AWU lawyer Josh Bornstein said the union is seeking a declaration that the investigation, including the search warrant and raids, were unlawful and motivated by a “political witch-hunt” as part of “Cash’s obsession with causing political harm to the AWU and to the opposition leader [Bill Shorten]”.

    "We think there’s been a misuse of government resources, a misuse of government powers by minister Michaelia Cash, to commence an investigation into her perceived political enemies," AWU national secretary Daniel Walton told a press conference outside court.

    “We think when the full case is run, documents presented in front of court, we’re hopeful the judge will see this has been a massive overstep and misuse of political resources,” Walton said.

    Cash is expected to appear in the witness box on Friday. Her lawyers foreshadowed they plan to argue that questions surrounding the conversations between the minister and her staff should be excluded from evidence.

    A spokesperson for Cash said she is "happy to assist the court".

    "This issue is all about the proper authorisation of donations made by the AWU," the spokesperson told the ABC.

    "The minister is not a party to the court case and never has been. The minister has simply been called by the AWU to give evidence."

    The trial continues.