Vermont Gov. Peter Shumlin, left, leads fellow Democratic governors along the White House driveway after a meeting with President Barack Obama last week.
While most D.C. lawmakers show scant interest in pushing through new legislation on climate change, Democratic governors across the country are advancing a new argument on the way forward: reducing carbon emissions and investing in clean energy, they say, is a job for the states.
“I personally believe that with this obstructionist Congress,” said Vermont Gov. Peter Shumlin, “nothing much good is gonna happen in Washington despite the president’s best efforts.”
Climate change does have its champions in Washington — the president gave it top billing in his State of the Union address last month — but amidst already ongoing battles over gun control and immigration, and the looming threat of the 2014 midterm election, action from Congress in the next two years remains unlikely.
The states, Shumlin told BuzzFeed, have the opportunity and responsibility to take the lead until legislation at the federal level becomes more feasible.
Since Shumlin became governor two years ago, Vermont has doubled its solar energy, and the state became one of nine in the northeast and mid-Atlantic to partner in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a promise to cap power plant emissions at 91 million tons of carbon per year in 2014.
“The states do need to be the laboratories for energy policy, and Vermont is certainly a good example,” Shumlin said.
The new governor of Washington, Jay Inslee, chose to dedicate a large section of his inaugural address two months ago to climate change, arguing that there was “no challenge greater” for his administration.
“One of the reasons I ran for governor,” Inslee told BuzzFeed, “is I believe my state can help lead the nation and the world to a high-technology future that will be beneficial economically, and for our environment.”
“The states are the place where we are going to make progress in the next year or two,” he added. “This is the field the game is going to be played on, and we’re going to move the ball.”
In a state like Hawaii — with low-lying coastal islands already exposed to rising sea levels as a result of global warming — taking measures to curb global warming is a necessity, not a political choice, said Gov. Neil Abercrombie.
“I can’t say what the Congress will do or not do, but we have to come to grips with these things,” said Abercrombie. “We have to take this on. Climate change as a concept is one thing, but trying to deal with it on a state-by-state basis, particularly if you’re in the middle of the Pacific as we are, involves finding local solutions.”
Shumlin, also chair of the Democratic Governors Association, argued that investing in clean energy at the state level would “not only reduce our carbon footprint — it’s gonna grow jobs,” he said.
“Because we’re harnessing the wind and the sun and our streams and bio mass, the result is, we have more green clean jobs per capita than any other state in America,” Shumlin said. “So it’s working.”
Although Republicans in and outside Washington have maintained that acting on climate change this year would do damage to an economy still in recovery, Delaware Gov. Jack Markell said the creation of added clean energy jobs should be incentive enough for red states.
“State by state, different governors can make the determination of how much they want to do,” said Markell, a Democrat. “The good thing, though, is that we’re showing you can improve your economy while also taking care of your environment at the same time — that’s a win-win, and it’s something more governors of both parties will look to do.”
But even in the face of Hurricane Sandy — the storm that pummeled up the East Coast last October, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage across the country — Republican governors are reluctant to credit climate change as an immediate challenge to their states.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, whose state was hit the hardest by Sandy, said last month that the environmental causes of the storm are beside the point.
“Maybe in the subsequent months and years, after I get done with rebuilding the state and getting people back in their homes,” he said during a press conference, “I’ll have the opportunity to ponder the esoteric question of the causes of the storm.”
But Shumlin remembers the storm in 2011, Hurricane Irene, that in Vermont alone claimed seven lives and $733 million in damage, as a pressing call to action for his state. Climate change on a federal level, he said, is political, but in the states, it easily takes on a strong shade of the personal.
“I’m convinced that when I go and fight a storm like Irene,” said Shumlin, “and I lose seven great Vermonters who die in a storm, and I see hundreds of Vermonters lose their homes, their businesses, every belonging they ever had, every photograph of their kids they ever had, and I’m out there giving them hugs and wishing I could restore their lives — but I know I can’t — that’s when climate change is staring me in the face.”
Please validate your account to contribute content.
Preview Your Response
- Benjamin Sapiens Democratic Governors: The States Must... and thinks it’s Win
- monkeyincognito thinks Democratic Governors: The States Must... is Fail
It is a shame that Republican governors are currently not also positioning their states as leaders in climate change policy. Gov. Pataki (R-NY) worked to create the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and Gov. Schwarzenegger (R-CA) was at the forefront of his state’s ambitious agenda. Even several men who ran for the Republican presidential nomination for 2012 took action to mitigate climate change during their governorships. Those of us seeking a reasonable and rational response to the scientific consensus- a response that not only helps the environment but improves economic, quality of life, and public health outcomes- must hope that the polarization of Washington on this issue will not infect state capitals. The states have achieved significant successes and Democrats and Republicans outside of the Beltway have an opportunity for bottom-up leadership going forward.
I’m pretty sure that trying to prevent a global catastrophe of Biblical proportions which could easily wipe the human race off the face of the Earth is a tiny bit more important than worrying about the economy. And the claim that human beings can’t affect climate is both wildly untrue and a lazy cop-out. But, hey, what do you care? You’re old, you’ll probably die before the shit really hits the fan. Very Louis XV of you.
- Jassy217 Democratic Governors: The States Must...
- Brandy B. Democratic Governors: The States Must...
- maryl24 Democratic Governors: The States Must...
- allisontrembly Democratic Governors: The States Must...
- Joey W. Democratic Governors: The States Must...
- eyleen_denisse Democratic Governors: The States Must...
yeah because “clean energy” has already created soooo many good new jobs. Meanwhile in MA they want to tear down the windmills they just put up at a cost of millions of dollars. Fighting climate change is a great idea, but relying on idiot politicians to pick technology they “think” might work is not. How about a national energy policy for pete’s sake?