The Pauls’ New Crusade: “Internet Freedom”

Defending the Internet — and the corporations that invest in it — from government regulation is the new “End the Fed,” Paul advisors tell BuzzFeed exclusively. A new Paul manifesto: “This is our revolution.”

I know, right? Now tell your friends!
The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet Free...
Rosie Gray

Ron and Rand Paul are set today to shift the central focus of their family’s long libertarian crusade to a new cause: Internet Freedom.

Kentucky senator Rand and his father Ron Paul, who has not yet formally conceded the Republican presidential nomination, will throw their weight behind a new online manifesto set to be released today by the Paul-founded Campaign for Liberty. The new push, Paul aides say, will in some ways displace what has been their movement’s long-running top priority, shutting down the Federal Reserve Bank. The move is an attempt to stake a libertarian claim to a central public issue of the next decade, and to move from the esoteric terrain of high finance to the everyday world of cable modems and Facebook.

The manifesto, obtained yesterday by BuzzFeed, is titled “The Technology Revolution” and lays out an argument — in doomsday tones —for keeping the government entirely out of regulating anything online, and for leaving the private sector to shape the new online space.

“The revolution is occurring around the world,” it reads. “It is occurring in the private sector, not the public sector. It is occurring despite wrongheaded attempts by governments to micromanage markets through disastrous industrial policy. And it is driven by the Internet, the single greatest catalyst in history for individual liberty and free markets.”

The manifesto quotes Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises and attacks not just the federal government, but also progressive groups that have called for similar measures to keep the Internet largely unregulated: “Today, the road to tyranny is being paved by a collectivist-Industrial complex — a dangerous brew of wealthy, international NGO’s, progressive do-gooders, corporate cronies and sympathetic political elites.”

The manifesto lays out five specific battles with government regulation and with liberals who state their goal of online liberty in similar terms, but who view corporate encroachment as a more immediate risk. The Paul manifesto seeks to rein in anti-trust actions against companies in new industries; to stop attempts to impose “Net Neutrality” rules on broadband providers; to prevent government control of online infrastructure; to broaden private control of the wireless spectrum, and shore up “private property rights on the Internet.”

The Pauls also take a stand for the growing industry known (and widely criticized) as “big data.”

They deride the notion that “private sector data collection practices must be scrutinized and tightly regulated inthe name of ‘protecting consumers,’ at the same time as government’s warrantless surveillance and collection of private citizens’ Internet data has dramatically increased.”

Paul’s so-called “Audit the Fed” bill will soon be put to a vote in the House of Representatives, and the new campaign will kick off shortly thereafter.

“We are going to bring to this project the same kind of intensity, resources and energy we brought to the Fed Audit,” said one Paul adviser.

The document is intended to serve as a conservative counterpoint to a Declaration of Internet Freedom released this week and hosted by the group FreePress, though the two share some goals. The earlier document, which sets out broad principles but does not take sides on divisive issues like Net Neutrality, was signed by groups including the American Civil Liberties Union as well as Internet companies such as Mozilla.

The language of the document tries to reclaim the issue of Internet freedom from the strange bedfellows that have staked a claim to it: progressives and tech companies on one hand, and more traditional conservative politicians like California Rep. Darrell Issa.

“Internet collectivists are clever,” the manifesto says, accusing their foes of series of Orwellian linguistic twists. “They are masters at hijacking the language of freedom and liberty to disingenuously pushfor more centralized control. ‘Openness’ means government control of privately owned infrastructure.’Net neutrality’ means government acting as arbiter and enforcer of what it deems tobe ‘neutral’.”

“This is our revolution — government needs to get out of the way,” the manifesto concludes.

This is also a new stage for what supporters refer to as the Ron Paul Revolution, and a way to make sure that Ron Paul’s followers stay on board with the movement after the congressman’s retirement from the House of Representatives. Paul supporters are already Internet-savvy, frequently launching digital campaigns of their own, and skew young. And the new cause gives his son Rand an easier way to connect with them, given that his relationship with his father’s supporters has often been fraught.

Internet freedom, Paul insiders say, is going to be Rand’s end-the-Fed.

Making Rand Paul the standard-bearer of Internet freedom “is one of the goals,” said a Republican strategist close to the campaign.

“As you may have noted he has been speaking out about Internet Freedom a fair amount including in his endorsement of Romney on Hannity,” the strategist said in an email. “Freedom online and freedom and liberty offline are seamlessly linked and Senator Paul gets that.”

A Paul adviser told BuzzFeed that the full Campaign for Liberty Internet project will start about two weeks after the Fed bill vote.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story mischaracterized the Declaration of Internet Freedom signed this week by several groups.

Check out more articles on BuzzFeed.com!

More ▾

Facebook Conversations

          

    20 Responses So Far

    • blackua   The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet...  about 4 months ago
    • Stacy Gooly   The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... and thinks it’s WTF, Fail & Shocking  about 7 months ago
    • denzelangrok   The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... and thinks it’s Win, LOL & OMG  about 8 months ago
    • GoroPrask   The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... and thinks it’s Old, Geeky & WTF  about 8 months ago
    • joshiektao thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is OMG, Win & LOL  about 8 months ago
    • davidtaodude   The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... and thinks it’s OMG, WTF & Win  about 9 months ago
    • marlah2 thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Fail  about 9 months ago
    • DoctorHank thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Win  about 9 months ago
    • antonioa4 thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Win  about 9 months ago
    • Cogitator X 9 months ago

      The Paulbots are out in force today. Freedom for the wealthy & powerful subservience for you that’s what a libertarian society would look like. But then I’m sure all these “libertarians” are just millionaires waiting for that big break.

    • Cogitator X thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Fail  about 9 months ago
    • timothyc6 10 months ago

      Um… The Government (DARPA) and public universities invented the Internet. Say again please: who is messing it up?

    • Michael R thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Win  about 10 months ago
    • JHo 10 months ago

      Let corporations decide what you can and cannot access on the internet. No problem there.

    • Liz Butler thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Win  about 10 months ago
    • arstechnica.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • frontporchpolitics.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • hungryhobbyist thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Win  about 10 months ago
    • manniet thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Fail  about 10 months ago
    • patrickk16 thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Fail  about 10 months ago
    • C. D. Maitland, Sr. thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Fail  about 10 months ago
    • alreadytaken thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Win  about 10 months ago
    • mobius1ski thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Ew, Fail & WTF  about 10 months ago
    • Giovanni Lido thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Win  about 10 months ago
    • littlegreenfootballs.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • boingboing.net readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • mudassirmoodyq   The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... and thinks it’s Geeky, Cute & Win  about 10 months ago
    • techdirt.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • andrei andreescu   The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet...  about 10 months ago
    • thehill.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • IambicPentaMaster 10 months ago

      Internet Freedom? How can there be when the Pauls don’t even have permission of the Internet’s inventor, Albert Gore, Jr. to dissent?

    • rhadams thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Win  about 10 months ago
    • chucku2 thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Win  about 10 months ago
    • johni7 10 months ago

      It’s unfortunate that the Pauls don’t target the reason for corporate tyranny in the internet: intellectual property. As an Austrian economist, he should at least be familiar with the work of fellow Austrian Stephan Kinsella, who has written and talked extensively about how IP is a major reason for corporate takeovers.

    • dustbowldaze 10 months ago

      If you can’t be free in real life, at least you can pretend to be free on the internet. These guys are about 10 years too late keeping the internet free. Governments and corporations rule the roost!

    • rakesbill thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Win  about 10 months ago
    • exiledonline.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • Hiroshim   The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet...  about 10 months ago
    • dslreports.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • awsa121 thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Ew  about 10 months ago
    • matthewt13 thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Win  about 10 months ago
    • maxkeiser.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • jaked9 10 months ago

      the cult of ron paul

    • slashdot.org readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • tech.slashdot.org readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • lewrockwell.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • brianh34 thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Win  about 10 months ago
    • idrudgereport.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • evilito 10 months ago

      Libertarians who think that the leaders of their movement are really all about liberty are being played for suckers. Today’s libertarians are essentially calling for plutocracy - unfettered rule by those with capital - and shielding it in pretty talk about liberty and freedom. Libertarians are against net neutrality, against measures that protect the public’s privacy from corporate whims, against the labeling of genetically modified foods…I could go on - but essentially, libertarians are all about shielding corporate power from any curb, no matter of the harm done to the public. The sad part is that many are being taken in by what they consider a vanguard philosophy or movement. They’re essentially working for their own serfdom.

    • dailypaul.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • marioamorenor   The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet...  about 10 months ago
    • geoffj thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Win  about 10 months ago
    • reddit.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • forbes.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • techmeme.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • www-ig-opensocial.googleusercontent.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • ObamaIs GodAwful 10 months ago

      This won’t excite the Ron Paul groupies — you can’t smoke the Internet.

    • TeddyKGB 10 months ago

      Thank goodness the Pauls are around to protect those poor corporations!

    • prestonp2   The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet...  about 10 months ago
    • drudgereport.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • politicalwire.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • HADOUKEN 10 months ago

      OH THANK GOD. Here come the Drudge Report mouth breathers to talk about stuff! They’re important, you guys!

    • HADOUKEN thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is Win  about 10 months ago
    • ethicalfan 10 months ago

      I don’t think they have looked at the unintended consequences of “internet freedom” and the agenda behind this movement. In the US the Bureau of Labor Statistics found that from 2002 to 2011 the incomes of musicians decreased 45%. A substantial percentage of the unemployed and underemployed today are people who’s livelihood has been affected by piracy. Its not just music anymore. It has now dropped Home Video revenues by 25% and books are next. The “open internet” agenda is just an excuse to help greedy tech entrepreneurs flip companies built on other people’s content and sell search engine ads on the backs of “free” content. Mr. Paul loves the Constitution. Copyright was included in the Constitution to proect creators and spur innovation. ISPs and search engines are simply ignoring copyright law. That is not “freedom”, that is oppression.

    • hamy   The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... and thinks it’s OMG & Win  about 10 months ago
    • rital2 10 months ago

      Ron Paul is making millions on gullible folks who support him. He just keeps taking their money and they absolutely worship him.

    • jairoj 10 months ago

      There should be minimal restriction on the Internet. But government should regulate it somewhat; can have xfinity letting u stream their crap lightning fast and slow netflix down. Unfair. Agree with the rest though.

    • foxnews.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • jakimovskik thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Internet... is WTF & Fail  about 10 months ago
    • tuckerl thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Int... is Win  about 10 months ago
    • natea2 thinks The Pauls' New Crusade: "Int... is Win  about 10 months ago
    • hotair.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Int... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • The Pauls' New Crusade: "Int... is starting to get hot on Facebook Share It  about 10 months ago
    • wykop.pl readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Int... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com readers just made The Pauls' New Crusade: "Int... hotter  about 10 months ago
    • ringdinger 10 months ago

      Yet another reason why Ron Paul is a blubbering belligerent baffling buffoon!!! Great job buzzfeed for exposing how craaaazy he is!!!

    • jairoj 10 months ago

      @jasonm52 Bravo! Very well said.

    • jasonm52 10 months ago

      As a self-described ‘moderate’ who would probably be labeled ‘liberal’ by others, I’ve always been baffled by those sympathetic to libertarian movement. If the libertarian worldview were fully implemented, it would lead down the same road of tyranny and authoritarianism as communism, or any collectivist socio-economic vision. Libertarianism is simply tyranny by a different name—instead of the politburo, power will be centralized within an ultra-wealthy, corporate elite. It’s imperfect, but a regulated, free-market system supported by a limited welfare state has proven time and time again to be the most prosperous, resilient and equitable. It needs to be reformed, made better; but not destroyed.

    • Rare Parrot 10 months ago

      How dystopian.

    • dangerouslytalented 10 months ago

      The Pauls are anarchocapitalists. They have the mantra that the government can’t do anything, and that would include any kind of regulation of the internet. The result would be that the main corporations (google and the telecommunications companies) will become the de facto government of the internet, completely usurping anything legitimately elected.

    • mijmm 10 months ago

      Should people serve corporations or corporations serve people? what’s needed is an elected government that represents the people (in deed, not just in promises and propaganda) and actually fight against the ever increasing power of corps to govern our lives. Giving free rein to corps and reducing elected government control doesn’t reduce government. It just passes government over to corps.  Government by corporations is government too. Unbridled power of corporations to control and govern people’s lives will be a nightmare of Stalinesque proportions. It’s a choice .. freedom for the individual and constrained corporations (corporations serve people), or freedom for corporations and constrained individuals (people serve corporations).

    Now Buzzing