The Sins Of General David Petraeus

Petraeus seduced America. We should never have trusted him.

I know, right? Now tell your friends!
The Sins Of General David Petraeus
Michael Hastings

The fraud that General David Petraeus perpetrated on America started many years before the general seduced Paula Broadwell, a lower-ranking officer 20 years his junior, after meeting her on a campus visit to Harvard.

More so than any other leading military figure, Petraeus’ entire philosophy has been based on hiding the truth, on deception, on building a false image. “Perception” is key, he wrote in his 1987 Princeton dissertation: “What policymakers believe to have taken place in any particular case is what matters — more than what actually occurred.”

Yes, it’s not what actually happens that matters — it’s what you can convince the public it thinks happened.

Until this weekend, Petraeus had been incredibly successful in making the public think he was a man of great integrity and honor, among other things. Most of the stories written about him fall under what we hacks in the media like to call “a blow job.” Vanity Fair. The New Yorker. The New York Times. The Washington Post. Time. Newsweek. In total, all the profiles, stage-managed and controlled by the Pentagon’s multimillion dollar public relations apparatus, built up an unrealistic and superhuman myth around the general that, in the end, did not do Petraeus or the public any favors. Ironically, despite all the media fellating, our esteemed and sex-obsessed press somehow missed the actual blow job.

Before I lay out the Petraeus counter-narrative — a narrative intentionally ignored by most of the Pentagon press and national security reporters, for reasons I’ll soon explain — let me say this about the man once known as King David, General Betray-Us, or P4, by his admirers, his enemies, and his fellow service members, respectively. He’s an impressive guy, a highly motivated individual, a world-class bullshit artist, a fitness addict, and a man who spent more time in shitty places over the past 10 years than almost any other American serving his or her country has. I’ve covered him for seven years now, and he’ll always have my respect and twisted admiration.

So it’s fair to say that P4 probably deserves something a little better than the public humiliation he’s about to endure. Sources who long feared him have already begun to leak salacious details; one told me this weekend that he took Broadwell along with him on a government-funded trip to Paris in July 2011. And questions about his role in the Benghazi debacle are also likely to deepen.

And Broadwell, too, is about to get slandered in a way no woman deserves. She’s the Pentagon’s Monica Lewinksy — and, despite Team Petraeus’ much advertised lip service to courage and integrity, it didn’t take long for his allies to swarm the press with anonymous quotes smearing the West Point graduate and married mother of two: that she wore “tight clothes,” as The Washington Post reported, or that she had her “claws in him.” In other words, how could Old Dave have resisted that slut’s charms?

Pretty shitty behavior, all around. As Petraeus ally and counterinsurgency scholar Dr. Andrew Exum might put it, stay classy!

But the warning signs about Petraeus’ core dishonesty have been around for years. Here’s a brief summary: We can start with the persistent questions critics have raised about his Bronze Star for Valor. Or that, in 2004, during the middle of a presidential election, Petraeus wrote an op-ed in The Washington Post supporting President Bush and saying that the Iraq policy was working. The policy wasn’t working, but Bush repaid the general’s political advocacy by giving him the top job in the war three years later.

There’s his war record in Iraq, starting when he headed up the Iraqi security force training program in 2004. He’s more or less skated on that, including all the weapons he lost, the insane corruption, and the fact that he essentially armed and trained what later became known as “Iraqi death squads.” On his final Iraq tour, during the so-called “surge,” he pulled off what is perhaps the most impressive con job in recent American history. He convinced the entire Washington establishment that we won the war.

He did it by papering over what the surge actually was: We took the Shiites’ side in a civil war, armed them to the teeth, and suckered the Sunnis into thinking we’d help them out too. It was a brutal enterprise — over 800 Americans died during the surge, while hundreds of thousands of Iraqis lost their lives during a sectarian conflict that Petraeus’ policies fueled. Then he popped smoke and left the members of the Sunni Awakening to fend for themselves. A journalist friend told me a story of an Awakening member, exiled in Amman, whom Petraeus personally assured he would never abandon. The former insurgent had a picture of Petraeus on his wall, but was a little hurt that the general no longer returned his calls.

MoveOn may have been ill-advised to attack the general as “Betray Us” in Washington, but there was little doubt that many in the Awakening felt betrayed.

Petraeus was so convincing on Baghdad that he manipulated President Obama into trying the same thing in Kabul. In Afghanistan, he first underhandedly pushed the White House into escalating the war in September 2009 (calling up columnists to “box” the president in) and waged a full-on leak campaign to undermine the White House policy process. Petraeus famously warned his staff that the White House was “fucking” with the wrong guy.

The doomed Afghanistan surge would come back to bite him in the ass, however. A year after getting the war he wanted, P4 got stuck having to fight it himself. After Petraeus frenemy General Stanley McChrystal got fired for trashing the White House in a story I published in Rolling Stone, the warrior-scholar had to deploy yet again.

The Afghan war was a loser, always was, and always would be — Petraeus made horrible deals with guys like Abdul Razzik and the other Afghan gangsters and killed a bunch of people who didn’t need to be killed. And none of it mattered, or made a dent in his reputation. This was the tour where Broadwell joined him at headquarters, and it’s not so shocking that he’d need to find some solace, somewhere, to get that daily horror show out of his mind.

(This past summer, there were more attacks in Afghanistan than in the summer before the surge, a devastating statistic. I could keep going, but if you’re interested, check out The Operators: The Wild and Terrifying Inside Story of America’s War in Afghanistan.)

How did Petraeus get away with all this for so long? Well, his first affair — and one that matters so much more than the fact that he was sleeping with a female or two — was with the media.

(For the record: Who really cares whom P4 is sleeping with? The idea that the FBI was investigating his sex life says more about the FBI and our absurd surveillance and national security state than it does about King David’s morality.)

Petraeus’ first biographer, former U.S. News and World Report reporter Linda Robinson, wrote a book about him, then went to CENTCOM to work for him. Yes — a so-called journalist published a book about him, then started getting a paycheck from him soon after. This went largely unremarked upon.

Another huge supporter was Tom Ricks, a former Washington Post journalist who found a second career as unofficial press agent for the general and his friends. Ricks is the ringleader of what I like to call “the media-military industrial complex,” setting the standard for its incestuous everyday corruption. He not only built Dave up, he facilitated the disastrous liaison between Broadwell and Petraeus. Ricks helped get Broadwell a literary agent, a six-figure book deal, and a publisher.

Broadwell was sold to publishers as much for her looks as what she was writing — she was an attractive package to push Petraeus and his counterinsurgency ideas. Little, Brown editor Geoff Shandler once told me how “hot” he thought Broadwell was after she came in to meet him at his office, and indicated to me that Broadwell had made him somewhat aroused. Intellectual integrity all around, to be sure.

Ricks blurbed her in All In, and earlier had promoted her content on his blog — the oddly titled Travels With Paula, a headline he slapped to a story about the U.S. military’s total destruction of a small village in southern Afghanistan. Broadwell described the ultra-violent wipeout in favorable terms — and when she was confronted with an angry villager whose house had been destroyed, she wrote that the Afghan’s tears and anger were a “a fit of theatrics.”

This was the kind of bullshit Ricks and Broadwell had been pushing — and it not only wasn’t called bullshit, it was embraced as serious work. Ricks wasn’t the only offender, of course — Petraeus more or less had journalists from many major media outlets slurping from the Pentagon’s gravy train. The typical route was to have all the cash and favors funneled through a third party like the Center for a New American Security.

CNAS was a Petraeus-inspired operation from its inception in 2007, and it made its reputation promoting Petraeus’ counterinsurgency plans. No problem, right? Except that it put the journalists who were covering those same plans and policies on its payroll. For instance, New York Times Pentagon correspondent Thom Shanker took money and a position from CNAS and still covered the Pentagon; Robert Kaplan, David Cloud from the Los Angeles Times, and others produced a small library’s worth of hagiographies while sharing office space at CNAS with retired generals whom they’d regularly quote in their stories.

But Petraeus’ crash is more significant than the latest nonsense sex scandal. As President Obama says, our decade of war is coming to an end. The reputations of the men who were intimately involved in these years of foreign misadventure, where we tortured and supported torture, armed death squads, conducted nightly assassinations, killed innocents, and enabled corruption on an unbelievable scale, lie in tatters. McChrystal, Caldwell, and now Petraeus — the era of the celebrity general is over. Everyone is paying for their sins. (And before we should shed too many tears for the plight of King David and his men, remember, they’ll be taken care of with speaking fees and corporate board memberships, rewarded as instant millionaires by the same defense establishment they served so well.)

Before Dave fell for Paula, we fell for Dave. He tried to convince us that heroes aren’t human. They are human, like us, and sometimes worse.

Check out more articles on BuzzFeed.com!

More ▾

Facebook Conversations

          

    41 Responses So Far

    • werenko thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is OMG, Win & LOL  about 3 months ago
    • bexv 5 months ago

      Funny how they look alike. He was basically having an affair with the female version of himself.

    • Henry Kuurx   The Sins Of General David Petraeus and thinks it’s Win & OMG  about 5 months ago
    • Josh Booxor   The Sins Of General David Petraeus and thinks it’s Fail, OMG & Cute  about 5 months ago
    • victoriac17 added Deception to the mix about 5 months ago
    • briang21 thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is Win  about 5 months ago
    • craigp8   The Sins Of General David Petraeus and thinks it’s Fail, WTF & Win  about 5 months ago
    • tomp22 6 months ago

      yeah- that evil bad military of ours. grow the fuck up. who sends our military into harm’s way? we do. every american needs to look in the mirror. when we want to sell more washers and dryers, or hamburgers, to people across the globe, or when we want cheap gas, who makes that possible? the military. whether petreus or macarthur or eisenhower - we will always need competent leaders in the military to execute national policy dictated by civilian leadership. go talk to your elected representative about the system that puts generals into the spotlight.  make sure you don’t blame any douchebag reporters who want to write a spicy story either. also, don’t look at yourself when you pine away about $0.99 / gallon gasoline, or buy / subscribe to magazines that employ writers desperate enough to glorify a general on the way up and kick them when they inevitably fuck up.

    • ormondo thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is WTF  about 6 months ago
    • Goroz Skinny   The Sins Of General David Petraeus and thinks it’s Fail, Win & WTF  about 6 months ago
    • davidp59 thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is Trashy  about 6 months ago
    • mikel37 thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is Win  about 6 months ago
    • mikel37 6 months ago

      Petraeus is an ambitious, pretty face, sent to replace the former incompetents,criminals and stooges that prosecuted the destruction of Iraq and Afghanistan. After declaring victory in those conflicts P4 was elevated to Chief Spy..ostensibly to discover Barack Obama’s true identity. Apparently he was getting too close and Obama cut him loose.

    • bogarr   The Sins Of General David Petraeus and thinks it’s Win  about 6 months ago
    • Arie Tharp   The Sins Of General David Petraeus and thinks it’s Win, OMG & Delightful  about 6 months ago
    • bogarr 6 months ago

      Real Journalism

    • Lamzee   The Sins Of General David Petraeus  about 6 months ago
    • MrFoster   The Sins Of General David Petraeus and thinks it’s Win  about 6 months ago
    • Jack J. thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is Win  about 6 months ago
    • Jack J. 6 months ago

      It is clear that this article pisses off warmongers……which is why we don’t see folks like Micahel Hasting on network TV shows. CNN, MSNBC and other can’t HANDLE the truth.

    • Melissa Ulto   The Sins Of General David Petraeus  about 6 months ago
    • Char Easton   +  The Sins Of General David Petraeus and thinks it’s OMG & Win  about 6 months ago
    • christopherjc 6 months ago

      The comments about the CNAS are pretty far off base. Far from being a Pentagon front, it’s a think tank built by the democrats to validate the foreign policy decisions of their presidential candidates in the 2008 election. Both of its co-founders were given appointments in the Obama administration as soon as he won office, and both of them left those positions so they could work full time on Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign. Its board of directors includes Madeline Albright, who served as Bill Clinton’s secretary of state, William Perry, who served as Clinton’s Secretary of Defense, and is chaired by richard Danzig, who was Clinton’s Secretary of the Navy. They gained a measure of notoriety in the veteran community when they published a study in October that advised the government to take steps to prohibit veterans from publicly endorsing candidates in presidential elections. It’s hardly an organization that’s in the tank for the Pentagon.

    • saharaali   The Sins Of General David Petraeus and thinks it’s Ew & OMG  about 6 months ago
    • rmp thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is Win  about 6 months ago
    • eddies6   The Sins Of General David Petraeus  about 6 months ago
    • patrickt12 6 months ago

      “Broadwell was sold to publishers as much for her looks as what she was writing — she was an attractive package to push Petraeus and his counterinsurgency ideas. Little, Brown editor Geoff Shandler once told me how “hot” he thought Broadwell was after she came in to meet him at his office” If this is true, then whether she dresses provocatively by wearing tight clothes is a perfectly fair topic to bring up, not slander that she doesn’t deserve.

    • Ariet Harpy   The Sins Of General David Petraeus and thinks it’s Fail & OMG  about 6 months ago
    • thepoliticalcat thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is Win  about 6 months ago
    • Jack J. 6 months ago

      Petraeus is a disgusting war monger and his only claim to fame in being responsible for the deaths of thousands in useless wars. A self promoter. The lowest of the low. Spot on Hastings.

    • constantinek   The Sins Of General David Petraeus  about 6 months ago
    • Schmidtshawn   The Sins Of General David Petraeus  about 6 months ago
    • Rob Fowler 6 months ago

      I agree with this article 99%, When they announced his stepping down, it was the best thing for this country. As a retired Major in the Army, I was dismayed by the things Petraeus did in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Look at just a couple of his most obvious ones: 1. When the ambassador and Petraeus spoke before congress about Iraq and what was going back in the early 2000’s. It was obvious they were trying not to answers congress’s questions and was not a believer in our Constitution, he and the ambassador were activity trying to mis-lead congress. Right then, I knew he had broken his oath as an officer to to protect our country against all enemies, foreign or domestic and he broke it on upholding the Constitution. 2. Taking credit for the surge in Iraq and allowing other political leaders to also say that and mis-leading the others who didn’t understand the real reason the surge worked. It worked because the local fighters decided to help remove the terrorists from their Iraq. Without them and our arming and paying them, the surge would never have worked, it would have failed like it did in Afghanistan.  3. Look at the prison abuses, only low ranking soldiers were changed. As a Officer, you are responsible for the people under your command. At the very least, the prison commander, company commander, and unit leaders should have been responsible for what happened. To me, it looked like they were being protected all the way in the chain of command up to the theater commander and maybe even the political leadership was protecting them as well, we will never know. Anyway, thank God he is gone. Major Rob

    • Matt Kiebus thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is Win  about 6 months ago
    • Willi Patterson thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is Win  about 6 months ago
    • denisepaulinon thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is WTF  about 6 months ago
    • mijmm thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is Cute  about 6 months ago
    • marclimon   The Sins Of General David Petraeus  about 6 months ago
    • mijmm 6 months ago

      yes .. the guy’s an idiot. But none of this addresses why he was fired.

    • davidl57 6 months ago

      David Petraeus has proven the old saying that absolute power really does corrupt one absolutely.

    • InadaptadaSocial thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is OMG  about 6 months ago
    • T. Morous thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is Trashy  about 6 months ago
    • JW 6 months ago

      There are a few things said by Hastings, here, that are transparently inciting. Cred rating goes down automatically. Please. For a guy who’s covered P4 for years, there seems to be a lack of basic understanding of either a) human nature, b) war, or c) both. While we can all arm-chair quarterback from the comfort of our own digs, the dealings of top political and defense officials play out an inherent part of our humanity most of us we can’t - or won’t - access. We are a walking contradiction, the truest reflection of how we fit into the grand scheme. Some good, some not. So: 1. Agreed, who cares who sleeps with whom.
      2. We will *never* know what decisions are made and for what reasons in war or highly-charged political environments.
      3. There are “good” people and “bad” people in every business, country, army, bus - you name it.
      4. We are mostly good - or we humans wouldn’t have survived this long.
      5. Sometimes good and bad are relative.
      6. Sometimes good people have to make bad decisions.
      7. Sometimes to make progress you have to make deals of convenience with the enemy (du jour).
      8. For better or worse, when one joins the military, one has no choice but to follow orders from the Commander in Chief (and, from outcomes from 2000-2008, we all know what can happen).
      9. It’s one thing to make a post-event objective assessment of an event or individual’s performance, but quite another to layer in ignorant subjectivity.
      10. This cheap approach to journalism always cuts both ways. Rise above it. You got your eyeballs not from your skill, but from hyperbole. P4 lived a life of compromise. It is baked into his job description. The only thing we know about how things worked during his career - with his direct involvement or not - is where we’re at today. This says little-to-nothing of his character, or who this guy really is, but more about his ability to survive in that environment. It is just the nature of the beast: that beast is all of us. Bottom line. Assertions are different from assumptions. With the former, you need facts. Hard facts. What I see here is mostly conjecture and one person’s perception of another. This is not to say we don’t all do it, but to present this story with such hand-waving and floor-stomping is suspect at best. I don’t doubt morality has been compromised, but what I doubt is a willingness to understand that a major part of human nature is the fluidity of our morality. From there, one could put a good and honest effort into one’s reporting.

    • Stanley Rodriguez thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is Trashy  about 6 months ago
    • myteebay 6 months ago

      Always a little surprising to find insightful political commentary on Buzzfeed, but just what I’ve come to expect from Mr. Hastings.

    • scottr22 6 months ago

      CNAS has a good amount of dirty laundry. CNAS staff member, Robert Leslie Deak, laundered $6 billion through the Bank of New York for the CIA and Semion Mogilevich.

    • shepherdj 6 months ago

      Protester in front CNAS office on Penn. Ave D.C.

    • ricks15 thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is Trashy, WTF & OMG  about 6 months ago
    • benl11 thinks The Sins Of General David Petraeus is Trashy  about 6 months ago
    • jagp 6 months ago

      QUOTE OF THE DAY! (Much thanks) “More so than any other leading military figure, Petraeus’ entire philosophy has been based on hiding the truth, on deception, on building a false image. “Perception” is key, he wrote in his 1987 Princeton dissertation: “What policymakers believe to have taken place in any particular case is what matters — more than what actually occurred.” ” Applies to Saddam’s WMD, the Killing Of Bin Laden, the ignored offer to take Bin Laden into custody by the Taliban, the “classified” evidence we have yet to see that was good enough to support an invasion of Afghanistan, the Jessica Lynch rescue, 911 Commission, fratboy hazing at Abu Ghraib, the burning of Pat Tillman’s uniform … and on and on…

    • Stanley Rodriguez 6 months ago

      Hastings wrote a long article in Rolling Stone back in Feb. about Petraeus’s Afghan policy. Everyone who’s complaining now should go read it.

    • Jack Shepherd   The Sins Of General David Petraeus and thinks it’s Nom Nom  about 6 months ago
    • Graysmith 6 months ago

      This is your Carrie Mathison Homeland moment, Michael. I hope you made a good cry face when you finally heard that he was dirty, just like you knew all along!

    Now Buzzing