How Gun Culture Won Over Liberals

The new “gun nuts”: media elites, locavores, and hipster hunters.

I know, right? Now tell your friends!
How Gun Culture Won Over Liberals
McKay Coppins

On a Sunday morning a couple years ago, Brooklyn journalist Foster Kamer and a few of his “particularly liberal” blogger friends decided to skip brunch and hit the shooting range instead.

“We said, hey, let’s do something ridiculous,” he recalled. “Let’s go shoot guns.”

They chose the nearest site they found, a range that operated out of a basement in midtown Manhattan. “The first thing that happened when we got there was we heard some guy hammering away at a target with what sounded like a cannon. It was just in such tight quarters. It kind of freaked us out.”

It didn’t keep them away, though.

One 30-minute gun safety lesson and a few bucks later, Kamer and his friends were blasting away at their own targets — the first of many. “Sometimes we go bowling, sometimes we eat together, and sometimes we go shooting,” he said. “It’s something to do.”

The current flare-up in the long political battle over gun laws is coming at a moment when American gun culture is more expansive than ever, having gained a foothold among the type of coastal elites that, just a couple decades ago, would have dismissed the very idea of holding a rifle as obscene and offensive. Hunting and recreational shooting, once viewed by the left as backwater pastimes, have won over a liberal coalition of eco-conscious locavores, hipster hunters, and adventure-seeking New York media elites.

Since that first experience, Kamer has made a handful of trips to a New Jersey shooting range, bringing along a cadre of Twitter-savvy media types — including New York Times columnist David Carr and Reuters social media editor Anthony De Rosa — who post photos of themselves posing with guns and tweet trash talk about each other’s shots.

Not long ago, photos like the one of Carr and co. posing with shotguns likely would have scandalized their more righteous liberal peers. In 1994, The New York Times Magazine captured the left’s gun taboo at the time with a long, first-person essay by a “hoplophobe” (someone with a morbid fear of weapons) who decides to visit a shooting range. The gun-fearing author, Phillip Weiss, disapprovingly describes the “almost orgasmic” feeling of wielding a shotgun, frets about the weapon’s threat to the “social contract,” and concludes that guns represent a “crude means of arriving at that feeling” of sovereignty.

These days, Kamer said, his outings to the gun range elicit little more than a shrug and some gentle teasing from even his friends.

“They’ll be like, ‘Man, you probably haven’t done anything remotely athletic or outdoorsy in a long time. And I’m like, ‘Hey, I can play a game of pickup basketball too. Get off me,’” Kamer said, reasoning that the hobby had little to do with violence. “I mean, this is actually an Olympic sport.”

Of course, not all of Kamer’s fellow sharp shooters travel in such open-minded circles. One occasional guest on the skeet shooting trips, James Del, works as the advertising director at Gawker, which recently published 446 pages containing the names of every registered gun owner in New York.

The headline: “Here Is a List of All the Assholes Who Own Guns in New York City.”

On a recent evening at Bull’s Head Tavern in Manhattan’s Chelsea neighborhood, twentysomething revelers balanced IPAs in one hand, and toy firearms — green handled or blaze orange — in the other. Antelope and deer loped across an HD screen, and players took turns drunkenly firing off shots at them. This was Big Buck Hunter, an arcade shooting game that has gained irony-fueled popularity across New York. About 130 bars in the city claim to offer it, and last November one East Village dive bar hosted a Big Buck Hunter world championship.

“It is our big draw,” said Bull’s Head bartender Jess. “People drive from Jersey to play it.”

Stereotypes of the hunter as the backwoods, toothless animal-killer span pop culture, from Elmer Fudd to South Park’s Uncle Jimbo — the gun-totin’, do-what-I-want wacko who hunts despite laws passed by “the Democrats.” He tells Cartman and friends to yell, “It’s coming right for us!” before shooting so that even rabbit hunting can be explained in court as a matter of self-defense.

In recent years, the “urban woodsman” trend has been well-documented, with one 2010 Esquire piece referring to the emerging flanel-and-boots hipster aesthetic as the “Field-and-Streamification” of fashion.

But veteran hunters say the the the movement extends beyond Urban Outfitters stocking up on hunting caps. Bill Heavey writes for Field & Stream as well as Garden & Gun, a stylish Southern lifestyle magazine that has attracted a devoted blue-state readership well outside its Charleston, South Carolina, headquarters. He said the rise of the “locavore” food trend — which favors free-range, organic, local meat — has inspired swarms of urban-dwelling foodies to trek out to the wilderness and try killing their own protein.

It’s an audience the longtime outdoors writer thinks he can now reach with a new book he’s working on.

“In my book, I’m hoping to keep my Field & Stream readers and cross over a little bit into the mainstream for people who are interested in alternatives to the food industry,” Heavey said. “People are realizing as they’re looking for free-range organic meat that venison fits the bill.”

The demographics are changing too. One in ten American hunters now is female, and the average age is skewing younger, said hunting blogger Holly Heyser.

“I’ve seen a lot of daddies taking their young daughters out hunting,” she said. “That’s a huge change. A decade ago people wanted to take their sons.”

For all the shifts, though, it remains to be seen whether the liberal infatuation with guns can survive the political sea change caused by a series of mass shootings last year. For the first time in decades, gun control advocates believe public opinion is firmly enough on their side that they will be able to defeat powerful lobbyists like the NRA in Congress — or reap the electoral fruits if they don’t.

As for Kamer, he said he hasn’t picked up a gun since last July, when a masked shooter opened fire on a crowded movie theater in Aurora, Colorado.

“After that, I think the thought just occurred to me, like, you know, there’s something that feels a little bit weird about doing this right now,” he said. “I just kept thinking, Jesus God, am I propagating this? Is there a way to justify this to myself?”

But Kamer, who spoke to BuzzFeed Wednesday afternoon, minutes after President Barack Obama went on TV and laid out the most aggressive gun control agenda in a generation, said there should be room on the left for both a cultural appreciation for guns, and support for the president’s efforts.

“Do I plan to go back again [to the range]? Yeah, yeah, I probably will,” he said. “Would I mind my ID being checked and having to sign off on a bunch of forms before I’m handed a rifle and a box of 20 shells? Hell no, I wouldn’t mind.”

Check out more articles on BuzzFeed.com!

Facebook Conversations

          

    11 Responses So Far

    • jeromeb2 3 months ago

      Note to urban locavores … maybe pellet guns are legal in your jurisdiction, squirrels are delicious.

    • Porter Browning 3 months ago

      Sorry dude, but this is completely stupid. Firearms aren’t toys. They are dead serious tools. People who hunt should be hunting for meat on the table - it they aren’t, they shouldn’t hunt. People who go to ranges for fun should get a life. As for video games, irrespective of whether or not they involve fake guns, they are stupid, too. Firearms are about defense. Defending your person, your home, your farm - if you are one of the few who still has one - and most importantly defending the republic from tyrants.  Get it?

    • Porter Browning 3 months ago

      “The headline: “Here Is a List of All the Assholes Who Own Guns in New York City.”” The a$$hole who did this deserves to be shot…

    • tiffanyv2   How Gun Culture Won Over Liberals  about 4 months ago
    • paajbog thinks How Gun Culture Won Over Liberals is Trashy  about 4 months ago
    • Solus 4 months ago

      Liberals and conservatives both own, use, and like guns. We didn’t get to 200+ million guns in this nation without a significant portion being in the hands of liberals. But the majority of “gun nuts” are conservative in that they not only have guns but oppose any meaningful restrictions on their use or laws tracking their sales. Opposing pragmatic laws to keep guns out of the hands of criminals is what makes one a nut.

      • Porter Browning 3 months ago

        That’s right. I despise the rightwingers. I have been voting progressive since Carter. But if the left tries to grab my guns I’m done with them - I will vote with people I hate out of pure spite.  You know who really are against weapons? Elites. Look at the people who are really pushing this: Autocrats like Schumer, Feinstien, and Bloomberg. Uber-wealthy people who have others with weapons to guard them. People who want to rule others. In other words, tyrants. And they have scared a bunch of way too easily scared people - cowards, not to put too fine a point on it - into thinking they can be “safe” if only… If only government can remove all the dangerous people, things, and ideas. Well, to be effective is to be dangerous. These safety freaks are completely incompetent. They can’t handle anything, and they want to force others into their narrow box. No thanks. People like that are cattle, and should be rounded up in cattle cars. They are a danger to freedom, which is more important than life.

    • GoEagles thinks How Gun Culture Won Over Liberals is Fail  about 4 months ago
    • the BuckWheat 4 months ago

      It is time for liberals (er, now “progressives”) to grow a pair and realize there are limits to government and to its laws in regulating personal behavior. Even if they could pass a law against murder, that would not have stopped the Sandy Hook Massacre, and even that started when the murderer shot his own mother four times in the head as she lay in bed. In reaction, New York State shamed itself by passing a law under the excuse of protecting the children when it had more people murdered by strangulation than by rifles. Indeed, nationwide in 2011 almost twice as many New Yorkers were murdered with hammers than with rifles of any type, putting aside the honest definition of “assault rifle”. No point of fact about Sandy Hook relates to the New York Law. The police, who are not obligated to protect anyone according to the Supreme Court, took 11 minutes to respond and when they arrived the killing was done.  Each 12 gauge shotgun shell of “00-Buckshot” has 9 pellets that are each 50% larger than the bullets used to murder those poor children and teachers. A shotgun in 11 minutes could have murdered even more children, in a more bloody way, than a rifle ever could. In 11 minutes, someone with a hammer in a room full of little children can still shatter a lot of skulls. But anyone who has watched enough movies already knows that. Curiously, libs insist on blaming and banning an object, as if it was sentient or something. But libs are all about root causes except when they are inconvenient. Not a word of concern about the family situation that may have been the root cause here. And we must not ever mention the correlation between crime and being raised in a home without a father present because that calls all that liberation theory into question. Happily I live in a state where I can own a fully accessorized AR-15 if I please, and in fact I do please. For the record, people do really hunt deer and other game with them. The last three that I killed were with an AR-15 in 6.8 SPC caliber.  Libs should also know that the best sniper rifles are bolt action. The magazine capacity is irrelevant because one shot is all you should need if everything is set up correctly.

      Do I “need” an rifle that some politicians call an “assault rifle”? Do we really need Hustler Magazine? I think that we could protect more children from sexual exploitation if we limit Hustler to no more than 30 pages, better yet, limit it to 10 pages, or 7 pages, then 3 pages, then NO pages. My children would be safer if we would ban that dangerous trash.

      • Solus 4 months ago

        Sorry but most of your argument is simply a straw man. Most liberals don’t favor banning all guns as you suggest. Liberals do, however, want effective laws that ban certain weapons and allow law enforcement to effectively keep guns out of the hands of criminals and the mentally unstable. Conservatives and the NRA have consistently fought against laws that would help law enforcement track the sale of guns, against registration of guns, stricter background checks, hold sellers and manufacturers liable for improper sales, and so on. So if it’s the bad guy that does the killing and not the gun he’s holding then why would you guys fight so hard to keep law enforcement from having effective tools to keep guns out of the hands of bad guys?

      • Porter Browning 3 months ago

        That’s bullsh!t… There are plenty of laws; they are enforced incompetently. This pussywhipped kid didn’t buy his guns - his wacko mother bought them and then let him have access. No law can fix something like that. What are you going to do - send everyone to a shrink? What makes you think they know anything valid, anyway? Life is risky. You cannot eliminate risk. Weapons kill more criminals than anyone else. Weapons in the hands of citizens save more innocent people than the pigs do. “Gun crime” can be broken up into a few broad categories. The largest by far is criminal activity for profit. Most of that is perped by young blacks who have grown up in an environment so hopeless it is absurd to expect them to be anything but criminals. Most of their victims are their peers. And most of those crimes could have been perped without firearms.  And more weapons in citizen’s hands will only cut into this segment of crime. The sort of crime that is common in cities - cities which by and large already have tough gun laws and enforcement - that kind of crime is rare in my neck of the woods. Why? First, there is enough opportunity here generations of people haven’t been automatically condemned to hopelessness. Second, we’re heavily armed. There is no percentage in violent crime when every third potential victim shoots back. The next, much smaller segment is crime of passion. It happens in every demographic, and a lot of times, the victims deserve what they get. I will not be hobbled because the Bickersons finally came to blows. I really don’t care what happens to them. And the last, very tiny segment of this are cases like that pussywhipped kid who went off in Newtown. That was as anomalous as a lightning strike. The only way to prevent that is to confiscate every weapon. And then these kids will pick another weapon. He could have driven a car into a crowd of kids, you know…  Meanwhile, a disarmed populace will suffer far more deaths to criminals than kids will be saved from nuts… No how, no way. I am just as important as some kid. I have a right to protect myself. If the cost of that is an occasional disaster… Too bad. The cost of owning automobiles is an occasional wrecked schoolbus. And it should be noted most of these slaughter events which have grabbed headlines are perped by young, affluent white boys who are under psychiatric care and are taking prescribed drugs. Which brings us back to an earlier point as a last question… If it is mentally unstable people being treated by shrinks with potions who are committing these crimes, what logic is there in having shrinks determine who can pack?

    • mikew41   How Gun Culture Won Over Liberals and thinks it’s Ew & Fail  about 4 months ago
    • Benjamin Sapiens 4 months ago

      Here is a diagram explaining, in part, how this article misses the point and is therefore fairly insightful and somewhat misleading.

    • samanthalockard   How Gun Culture Won Over Liberals and thinks it’s Facepalm!  about 4 months ago
    • introvert 4 months ago

      Responsible people, who treat others respectfully, don’t seem to have a problem with using firearms. I don’t believe any of these people mentioned in the article ever killed or harmed anyone else. So what’s the problem?

    • danr25   How Gun Culture Won Over Liberals and thinks it’s Fail, Trashy & Ew  about 4 months ago
    • Austin Baird   How Gun Culture Won Over Liberals  about 4 months ago
    • moskowdisco thinks How Gun Culture Won Over Liberals is Ew & Fail  about 4 months ago
    • Mequet H.   How Gun Culture Won Over Liberals and thinks it’s WTF & Fail  about 4 months ago
    • ninag4   How Gun Culture Won Over Liberals  about 4 months ago
    • Mequet H. 4 months ago

      This article is basically just ridiculous stereotypes strung together with exaggerations. I’m about as liberal as they come and I’m no more scandalized by people going to the shooting range than I am by the fact that some people go to church on Sunday. I mean seriously? What a shitty excuse for an article.

    • AmericanLife   How Gun Culture Won Over Liberals  about 4 months ago
    • evilito 4 months ago

      What a crappy, cliche-ridden story. The idea that a photo of a bunch of supposedly liberal dudes would “scandalize” their more self-righteous peers is absurd. Believe it or not, many people of the liberal persuasion hunt - a lot of it due to family traditions and whatnot. It’s nowhere near as foreign as your silly story makes it out to be. This is nothing but a series of cliches looking for a story to tie them together. It’s too bad that as Buzzfeed brings in more writers, the original content begins to look more and more like same old tired MSM crap.

    • ocl313   How Gun Culture Won Over Liberals and thinks it’s Ew & Trashy  about 4 months ago
    • meredithmo thinks How Gun Culture Won Over Liberals is WTF  about 4 months ago
    • maggpie87 thinks How Gun Culture Won Over Liberals is WTF & Trashy  about 4 months ago
    • onehit 4 months ago

      So a few liberals and some locavores have taken to shooting and suddenly it’s a “liberal infatuation”? Sorry, I’m not buying it. In any case, hunting and shooting at a range are not the issue here. The issue is semi-automatic military style weapons that can kill a great number of people in a few seconds and selling guns to people without background checks. If this article was about liberals going gung-ho over those type of weapons and suddenly berating gun control, that would be a story…

    • FlickMontana 4 months ago

      I was terrified at the gun range and almost didn’t make it behind the glass door. The I saw a father and his 8-y/o girl (or thereabouts) blasting away with a shotgun and said, “well shit.” It’s a load of fun and super easy. I hope I only ever have to shoot at paper targets.

    Now Buzzing