Maker’s Mark Decides Not To Cut Alcohol Volume After All

The whiskey producer planned to lower its ABV from 45 percent to 42 percent. America didn’t let that happen.

I know, right? Now tell your friends!
Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut Alcoho...
Jessica Testa
Image by Keith Bedford / Reuters

Nine days after announcing plans to reduce Maker’s Mark alcohol volume in order to boost supply, the company has reversed its controversial decision.

Maker’s Mark owners Rob and Bill Samuels issued the statement Sunday:

Since we announced our decision last week to reduce the alcohol content (ABV) of Maker’s Mark in response to supply constraints, we have heard many concerns and questions from our ambassadors and brand fans. We’re humbled by your overwhelming response and passion for Maker’s Mark. While we thought we were doing what’s right, this is your brand – and you told us in large numbers to change our decision.

You spoke. We listened. And we’re sincerely sorry we let you down.

So effective immediately, we are reversing our decision to lower the ABV of Maker’s Mark, and resuming production at 45% alcohol by volume (90 proof). Just like we’ve made it since the very beginning.

The unanticipated dramatic growth rate of Maker’s Mark is a good problem to have, and we appreciate some of you telling us you’d even put up with occasional shortages. We promise we’ll deal with them as best we can, as we work to expand capacity at the distillery.

And the whiskey continued to floweth:

Check out more articles on BuzzFeed.com!

Facebook Conversations

          

    1 Response So Far

    • elvisdepressley thinks Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut A... is Win  about 3 months ago
    • lockam thinks Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut A... is COOL  about 3 months ago
    • chandlernoelle thinks Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut A... is Win  about 3 months ago
    • Cadyann   Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut A...  about 3 months ago
    • JGenz   Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut A...  about 3 months ago
    • alexmsmith   Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut A...  about 3 months ago
    • Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut A... is starting to get hot on Facebook Share It  about 3 months ago
    • thenateperry   Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut A...  about 3 months ago
    • louisthecat   Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut A... and thinks it’s Win  about 3 months ago
    • emmysmiles thinks Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut A... is Trashy  about 3 months ago
    • Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut A... is starting to get hot on Twitter Tweet It  about 3 months ago
    • J L   Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut A...  about 3 months ago
    • Halpiee   Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut A...  about 3 months ago
    • margaretmac95 thinks Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut A... is Win & LOL  about 3 months ago
    • lauraarayata   Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut A... and thinks it’s Win  about 3 months ago
    • lanabrynf thinks Maker's Mark Decides Not To Cut A... is Win  about 3 months ago
    • alaynap 3 months ago

      Now this is exactly how corporate America should act instead of forcing its consumers to accept their decisions. I’m sure Maker’s Mark would’ve still sold quite a bit of whiskey, but knowing the disappointment of their true fans wasn’t worth the extra net income warms my heart immeasurably. In fact, this is the sort of business practice that would make me choose a product over another of similar quality, even if M’sM is a little more expensive than the other. Brava M’sM, brava.

    Now Buzzing