Mitt Romney’s Blunt Talk On Venture Capital
Most don’t succeed, he said under oath in testimony released today, portions of which were obtained by BuzzFeed. Most, he says, are “liquidated” or “harvested.”
Romney was examined by Joseph Walsh, the lawyer for Maureen Sullivan-Stemberg, in a suit against her ex-husband, Thomas G. Stemberg. The judge rules for Thomas Stemberg, the founder of Staples. The testimony was given in Norfolk, Mass. Probate Court on October 7, 1991.
Romney also suggested in another section of his testimony that he believed in the late 1980s that Staples had only a 25% chance of survival — a somewhat surprising comment given how central his investment in Staples has been to the narrative of his career as a master investor, and even to the video that introduced him at the Republican National Convention this year.
HOT ON
Facebook Conversations
2 Responses So Far
- MEP thinks Mitt Romney's Blunt Talk On Ventu... is WTF
- Mitt Romney's Blunt Talk On Ventu... is starting to get hot on Twitter Tweet It
- andysbasura thinks Mitt Romney's Blunt Talk On Ventu... is Fail
- nationalreview.com readers just made Mitt Romney's Blunt Talk On Ventu... hotter
-
- MichaelTheGreat Mitt Romney's Blunt Talk On Ventu... and thinks it’s Cute & Win
-
buddersmoosh 6 months agoIt’s about his business dealings, it’s pretty sketchy if you ask me. He’s talking about how he basically took a company it’s earnings and reaped the profits from it, so in the case of the ex wife, she didn’t get anything because Romney or whoever valuated the company for less than what it was worth. What a POS!
-
- buddersmoosh thinks Mitt Romney's Blunt Talk On Ventu... is Fail & OMG
- commentarymagazine.com readers just made Mitt Romney's Blunt Talk On Ventu... hotter
- Praveen Jayakumar thinks Mitt Romney's Blunt Talk On Ventu... is Fail






Special Reactions
Your Reaction?
React with an animated GIF!
READY. SET. REACT!
GET STARTED