Economic Official Sperling Warned Woodward

The meaning of the word “regret.”

I know, right? Now tell your friends!
Economic Official Sperling Warned Woodward
Ben Smith

The White House official who Bob Woodward charged had crossed a line by saying he would “regret” printing his version of a set of Washington negotiations was Gene Sperling, the director of the White House Economic Council, a source familiar with the exchange told BuzzFeed Wednesday.

The email from Sperling to Woodward, which Woodward read to Politico on Wednesday, has transfixed Washington, with Republicans and some in the press charging that it embodies a White House lording it over a cowed press corps.

Woodward, Politico reported, called the top official — identified to BuzzFeed as Sperling — to tell him that he would question Obama’s account of negotiations leading to the “sequester” — automatic cuts set to take effect next month.

The aide “yelled at me for about a half hour,” Woodward said, and then sent a follow-up email that read, in part: “You’re focusing on a few specific trees that give a very wrong impression of the forest. But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here. … I think you will regret staking out that claim.”

Officials often threaten reporters that they will “regret” printing something that is untrue, but Woodward took the remark as a threat.

“They have to be willing to live in the world where they’re challenged,” he told Politico. “I’ve tangled with lots of these people. But suppose there’s a young reporter who’s only had a couple of years — or 10 years’ — experience and the White House is sending him an email saying, ‘You’re going to regret this.’ You know, tremble, tremble. I don’t think it’s the way to operate.”

Sperling, a former aide to Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin who held the same position in Clinton’s second term, is a veteran Democratic budget wonk and party insider. Remarked one friend Wednesday, he is “not exactly cut from the classic, no-drama Obama cloth.”

Sperling didn’t respond to an email inquiry about the exchange; a White House spokesman declined to comment on the authorship of the email to Woodward.

Check out more articles on BuzzFeed.com!

Facebook Conversations

          

    13 Responses So Far

    • elizabethw26 2 months ago

      re·gret [ri-gret] Show IPA verb, re·gret·ted, re·gret·ting, noun
      verb (used with object)
      1.
      to feel sorrow or remorse for (an act, fault, disappointment, etc.): He no sooner spoke than he regretted it.
      2.
      to think of with a sense of loss: to regret one’s vanished youth.

    • nytimes.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • rense.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • politicalwire.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • davidc94 thinks Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • TyrellCorp 2 months ago

      It’s obvious that Bernstein had the brains, the balls, and the journalistic skills. Woodward is a hack.

    • Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... was rebuzzed by farkpolitics  about 2 months ago
    • nymag.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • Ashley S thinks Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... is WTF  about 2 months ago
    • tokie 2 months ago

      I think the word ‘regret’ was used in a similar manner to, “Buzzfeed will ‘regret’ making a big deal over Woodward’s faux appall.”

    • qbert61 2 months ago

      People claiming this is a threat are taking one sentence WAY out of context… try reading the entire set of emails…neither of them (in the emails) seem mad or even threating… in fact Sperling apologizes several times in the email for raising his voice. Unbelievable how far some people will go to pin something for their side…  From Gene Sperling to Bob Woodward on Feb. 22, 2013
      Bob:
      I apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today. My bad. I do understand your problems with a couple of our statements in the fall — but feel on the other hand that you focus on a few specific trees that gives a very wrong perception of the forest. But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here.
      But I do truly believe you should rethink your comment about saying saying that Potus asking for revenues is moving the goal post. I know you may not believe this, but as a friend, I think you will regret staking out that claim. The idea that the sequester was to force both sides to go back to try at a big or grand barain with a mix of entitlements and revenues (even if there were serious disagreements on composition) was part of the DNA of the thing from the start. It was an accepted part of the understanding — from the start. Really. It was assumed by the Rs on the Supercommittee that came right after: it was assumed in the November-December 2012 negotiations. There may have been big disagreements over rates and ratios — but that it was supposed to be replaced by entitlements and revenues of some form is not controversial. (Indeed, the discretionary savings amount from the Boehner-Obama negotiations were locked in in BCA: the sequester was just designed to force all back to table on entitlements and revenues.)
      I agree there are more than one side to our first disagreement, but again think this latter issue is diffferent. Not out to argue and argue on this latter point. Just my sincere advice. Your call obviously.
      My apologies again for raising my voice on the call with you. Feel bad about that and truly apologize.
      Gene
      From Woodward to Sperling on Feb. 23, 2013
      Gene: You do not ever have to apologize to me. You get wound up because you are making your points and you believe them. This is all part of a serious discussion. I for one welcome a little heat; there should more given the importance. I also welcome your personal advice. I am listening. I know you lived all this. My partial advantage is that I talked extensively with all involved. I am traveling and will try to reach you after 3 pm today. Best, Bob Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/exclusive-the-woodward-sperling-emails-revealed-88226.html#ixzz2ME1Zcua7

    • dailykos.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • thedailybeast.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • Stevil907 thinks Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • Joan Secrest 2 months ago

      Of course it is a threat, and was meant as a threat. This is blue book Progressive Sol Lewinsky smearing the people that disagree so that no one will disagree. Remember when they went after Romney’s donors. They smeared them and had the IRS investigate them for supporting their opponent. REmember when the President had his “business” discussion, when he only invited those who didnot support Romney in any way and who did not disagree with him. Remember when he only has union members in those meetings. THis President is an idealogue accusing the Republicans of being idealogues when he doesn’t give an inch.

    • michaely8 2 months ago

      So, Woodward has become so marginalized that he has to seize upon misinterpreting remarks to make the news. It’s sad.

    • Lisa R. thinks Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • news.yahoo.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • rkirkwood 2 months ago

      Officials often threaten reporters that they will “regret” printing something that is untrue… That’s an interesting claim without any provided evidence. And if it is true, that’s apparently not bothersome to the Mr. Smith.

    • introvert thinks Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... is Trashy  about 2 months ago
    • Lisa R. 2 months ago

      It’s really not hard to post the entire Sperling email so we can judge for ourselves how threatening it is: “I apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today. I do understand your problems with a couple of our statements in the fall — but feel on the other hand that you focus on a few specific trees that gives a very wrong perception of the forest. But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here. But I do truly believe you should rethink your comment about saying saying that Potus asking for revenues is moving the goal post. I know you may not believe this, but as a friend, I think you will regret staking out that claim … My apologies again for raising my voice on the call with you. Feel bad about that and truly apologize.”

    • salon.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • dailycaller.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • bruuno thinks Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... is Fail  about 2 months ago
    • introvert 2 months ago

      Will we ever have a good government in this century? It is now widespread knowledge that the WH threatens reporters who don’t tow the state line. In terms of this country’s history, Bush and Obama have taken this sordid practice to an unprecedented level. Come meet the new boss, just like the old boss.

    • lucianne.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • marclimon   Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo...  about 2 months ago
    • athiejane 2 months ago

      Woodward is a man trying desperately trying to maintain his relevance through stunts.

    • breitbart.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • powerlineblog.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • editors.talkingpointsmemo.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • memeorandum.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • businessinsider.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • huffingtonpost.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... is starting to get hot on Facebook Share It  about 2 months ago
    • ndnation.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • freerepublic.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • talkingpointsmemo.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • nationalreview.com readers just made Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... hotter  about 2 months ago
    • Economic Official Sperling Warned Woo... is starting to get hot on Twitter Tweet It  about 2 months ago
    • petep6 2 months ago

      Obama = Nixon. That seems to be the (increasingly credible) upshot of Woodward’s recent reporting. I don’t think that’s what he wants to say but the Obama people are painting themselves into that corner…

    • alexduvall18 2 months ago

      If he hasn’t already, as he’s on the network constantly these days, I think it’s about time for Woodward to make it official, and become a paid Fox News Contributor.

    • GSiggs 2 months ago

      Still having a difficult time figuring out what is so evil about telling a reporter that they will regret attaching their name to published, inaccurate information.

    Now Buzzing