The Five Different Reasons Why Susan Rice’s Benghazi Talking Points Were Edited

A clear statement has yet to emerge from the Obama administration about who edited Susan Rice’s talking points — and why — before she relayed faulty information on Sunday talk shows.

I know, right? Now tell your friends!
The Five Different Reasons Why Susan Rice&...
Andrew Kaczynski

1. References were removed to not tip off al-Qaeda and were substituted with “extremists,” according to David Petraeus.

Source: scrapetv.com  /  via: nytimes.com

2. The links to al-Qaeda were too “tenuous” to make public by DNI because the source wasn’t trusted.

3. “The talking points were debated and edited by a collective of experts from around the IC,” not just DNI, according to a DNI spokesman.

4. The CIA told Senators McCain, Graham, and Ayotte the FBI removed references to al-Qaeda from the talking points “to prevent compromising an ongoing criminal investigation.”

Source: i2.mail.com  /  via: csmonitor.com

5. The CIA later called Senators McCain, Graham, and Ayotte back, saying they had misspoke to them and that they — not the FBI — had edited the talking points.

Check out more articles on BuzzFeed.com!

Facebook Conversations

          

    Responses So Far

    • samuelbartb   The Five Different Reasons Why Susan ...  about 5 months ago
    • Stephen Gutowski thinks The Five Different Reasons For Why Su... is WTF  about 5 months ago
    Now Buzzing