Actually I’m pro-life and a vegetarian. And I think that you’ll find most broad-sweeping generalizations are not true. As I just responded to someone else asking about rape, in cases involving rape, MOST pro-life folks place the woman’s health and well-being above the possible conception. Not being ready to have a child..why are they having unprotected sex? I’m whole-life. No war. No death penalty. No abortion. No meat.
In accord with the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services (no. 36), the care for the rape victim has four aspects: First, she must receive spiritual and psychological support and counseling to help her deal with the trauma of the attack. Such support and counseling will probably continue for some time after the immediate period. Second, health care providers need to cooperate with law enforcement officials, gathering evidence that can be used in the prosecution of the rapist. Third, the victim needs treatment for bruises, cuts, or other injuries. Finally, health care providers must provide treatment to prevent the possible contraction of venereal disease and pregnancy. The Directives state, “A woman who has been raped may defend herself against a conception resulting from sexual assault. If, after appropriate testing, there is no evidence that conception has occurred already, she may be treated with medication that would prevent ovulation, sperm capacitation, or fertilization. It is not permissible, however, to initiate or to recommend treatments that have as their purpose or direct effect the removal, destruction, or interference with the implantation of a fertilized ovum.”(no. 36)