Also,Idon't think they were "refuted", per say, since that would mean 'to disprove with evidence' and the arguments aren't meant to have empirical evidence, but rather logical induction. "Rebut" would beabetter word.
You might want to give some credit to Pascal for his Wager...
But, in response to the article asawhole,Ithink it'sashame that the poster had to dumb down the first four to the point of absurdity. Regardless of whether or not they were refuted, they're interesting arguments…Â
Recent Comments
StonehengeApocalypse commented on 5 Awesome Proofs Of God
3/5/2013
0
StonehengeApocalypse commented on 5 Awesome Proofs Of God
3/5/2013
0