back to top
Politics

This Was How The Voters Judged The Party Leaders After The Election

It kind of explains the election result.

Posted on

In the wake of the Tories' surprise election victory, the pollsters have been trying to work out what went wrong.

One of the simplest explanations comes from the "Battleground Britain" project, carried out by Deborah Mattinson of Britain Thinks in association with The Guardian. During the campaign, it convened panels of 10-12 swing voters in various key constituencies, and asked them to keep diaries of their political thoughts.

In its post-election wrap-up, which you can download here, it summarises the key findings. The most obvious was what happened when voters were asked to think of the words they associated with the party leaders.

Advertisement

When asked to think of an animal he resembled, one answer was "He's a lion. He's confident, he knows what he's doing – and he prowls around like one."

The animal-related verdict was: "Like a baby panda – cute and likeable, but clumsy and slow to get started."

Advertisement

Battleground Britain carried out the same exercise before the campaign started, to see how impressions changed.

The words that got added to Cameron's profile during the course of the election, or that moved up in significance, were "confident", "repetitive", "smooth" and "statesman".

For Miliband, they were "principled" and "determined", but also "awkward", "untrustworthy" and – cruelly – "trying". With Farage, the words that got more prominent were "dangerous", "divisive" and "idiot". Clegg's were "weak", "honest" and, simply, "finished".

Robert Colvile is UK News Director at BuzzFeed and is based in London.

Contact Robert Colvile at robert.colvile@buzzfeed.com.

Got a confidential tip? Submit it here.