I have to be completely honest, I came up with an answer for every one of these, and none of them took more than a few seconds. Most of my responses would have been pointing out that an assumption made to formulate the question, or statement, was false. These are some of the least intelligent creationist arguments I have ever seen. The problem is that faith and science are at odds no matter how you slice it. A book that tells you to believe something is not proof of anything. Science relies on repeated observations, and creationism relies on faith. Even by arguing the two you are comparing apples to oranges.