An Argument Against Double Stuf Oreos
They're terrible. Sorry not sorry.
Look, everyone can agree that Oreos are an amazing cookie. But some blasphemous people think that Double Stuf Oreos are better than the original.
Be warned: This debate has ended friendships, but tbh, those friends probably weren't worth having in the first place.
The Oreo is a classic American treat. Your grandpa ate Oreos.
It's a perfect sandwich cookie. The 2:1 cookie to filling ratio* is essential to the Oreo's success.
It's restrained. It's simple. It's nostalgic. It's... Dear god, it's beautiful.
With Double Stuf Oreos, meanwhile, there's the same amount of cookie and creme. There's no subtlety.
This cookie is gauche as hell.
Double Stuf Oreos have no restraint. They are "supersized" cookies, which is not a thing that should exist.
They're too big and bulky to comfortably bite into.
The new (read: worse) creme-to-cookie ratio totally changes how the cookie interacts with a glass of ice-cold milk. IS NOTHING SACRED?
And, real talk, Oreo "creme" filling is kinda suspect. What is it, really?
The cookie is also a dirty, filthy liar. There isn't actually twice as much "stuf."
And doesn't it bother anyone that "Stuf" is missing an "F?"
Above all, Double Stuf Oreos are evil because they're horrible trendsetters. When they were invented in 1975, they opened the door that this abomination would walk through decades later.
And this evil, evil thing.
And this monstrosity, which is frankly offensive.
Whoever created these should be in jail.
Stick to regular Oreos: the original and the best.
Keep up with the latest daily buzz with the BuzzFeed Daily newsletter!