An Argument Against Double Stuf Oreos

They're terrible. Sorry not sorry.

Posted on

Look, everyone can agree that Oreos are an amazing cookie. But some blasphemous people think that Double Stuf Oreos are better than the original.

Be warned: This debate has ended friendships, but tbh, those friends probably weren't worth having in the first place.

It's a perfect sandwich cookie. The 2:1 cookie to filling ratio* is essential to the Oreo's success.

Flickr: mihoda / Creative Commons

*Technically the official ratio is 71% to 29%, but in terms of sections it's a beautiful two cookies to one dab of creme filling.

This cookie is gauche as hell.

And doesn't it bother anyone that "Stuf" is missing an "F?"

Nabisco / Via 973thedawg.com

There must be a reason why they chose to spell it that way — a sinister one, probably. WHAT ARE YOU HIDING, NABISCO? WHAT IS "STUF?"

Above all, Double Stuf Oreos are evil because they're horrible trendsetters. When they were invented in 1975, they opened the door that this abomination would walk through decades later.