back to top

House Shoots Down Amendment To Ban Funding For NSA Surveillance Programs

The amendment lost by only a 12 vote margin. "I like all those no votes," Speaker John Boehner said as time on the vote ran out.

Posted on

The House voted down an amendment Wednesday to its version of the Department of Defense's 2014 budget that would have banned funding to NSA surveillance programs such as PRISM by a slim 12 vote margin.

The amendment, the first major legislative test since the once secret programs were made public by Edward Snowden, was defeated 205-217.

Initially proposed by Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) the amendment sought to ban any funds from the Department of Defense's 2014 budget from being directed to the NSA for surveillance of anyone not actually under investigation by law.

As the two minute vote ran out of time on the floor, House Speaker John Boehner was heard just off the House floor saying loudly, "I like all those no votes." In an unusual move for any House speaker, especially on an amendment, Boehner voted No.

The amendment had support and opposition from both sides of the aisle. Michigan Democrat John Conyers introduced the bill along with Amash. There were more than 40 co-sponsors of the bill, including some of the House's most liberal and most conservative representatives.

House Intelligence Committee Chair Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), who in recent days has been one of the strongest voices against the amendment, said during a debate before the vote that passing the bill "takes us back to September 10th," diminishing the military's ability to keep tabs on terrorists.

Rep. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) closed the debate echoing Rogers sentiments.

"This program has stopped dozens of terrorist attacks," Cotton said. Adding, "this amendment blows it up."

But Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.), a co-sponsor of the amendment, argued that the NSA's surveillance programs, which collect metadata of calls and emails but not their actual content, ought to be banned because those who "balance" control of what gets recorded and what doesn't are unelected and anonymous.

"Right now the balancing is being done by people who we do not know, who we do not elect," he said.

The Senate is expected to present their mark up of the budget sometime next week.

Amash responded to the loss on Twitter:

We came close (205-217). If just 7 Reps had switched their votes, we would have succeeded. Thank YOU for making a difference. We fight on.

Justin Amash


We came close (205-217). If just 7 Reps had switched their votes, we would have succeeded. Thank YOU for making a difference. We fight on.

This measure is critical in our efforts to provide our men and women in uniform the resources they need to help protect our country, and I'm pleased it passed in bipartisan fashion. I am particularly pleased that members on both sides of the aisle worked together to preserve critical intelligence tools that have proven successful in preventing terrorist attacks and keeping America safe. This measure responsibly provides the necessary resources for our deployed troops in Afghanistan as well as the resources and authorities our military and intelligence professionals need to respond to the security challenges in Syria, Iran, North Korea and other dangerous places around the world. I commend Chairmen Rogers and Young for their work on this bill and call on Senator Reid to bring it to a vote on the Senate floor so we can do right by our troops, our intelligence professionals, and their families.

Jacob Fischler is a political reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in Washington, D.C.

Contact Jacob Fischler at

Kate Nocera is the DC Bureau Chief for BuzzFeed’s Washington, DC bureau. Nocera is a recipient of the National Press Foundation's 2014 Dirksen Award for distinguished reporting on Congress.

Contact Kate Nocera at

Got a confidential tip? Submit it here.