LOFL (laugh out freekin loud)!

Loved your post, “KingPsyz”!

I agree w/ this post entirely: “No, actually. If you will read for comprehension, the waitress identified the pastor as “sir.” No right to privacy is implied nor granted on a signature. If it were, we would not feel that it would be appropriate to leave a signed check on a table as we leave a restaurant. And we wouldn’t be posting…ON THE INTERNET…using names. By posting a signature, the waitress did no material or cognizable harm to the pastor. That others reacted to it and contacted the pastor - directly or indirectly - is not the fault of the waitress, not the fault of the rest of the people involved. It’s the pastor’s own fault that in this day and age, she did not realize that it COULD be shared. She got embarrassed because someone called her on her bullshit maneuver (that incidentally is completely incompatible with the faith she presumably preaches), and in retaliation got the waitress fired. Again, incompatible with her ‘faith’. But I’d also like to add that anyone who signs w/ an actual signature, as they would a bank check or important document is being naive - that signature is NOT protected when left on the table of a restuarant! Be more careful & awarte than that, people - pay at the front desk or via folder, but don’t expect that a receipt on a table is somehow secure, for your own good.