Honestly, it seemsalittle exploitative to use homeless people to makeapoint re: Mr. Jeffries. Yes, he’sadouche. So, his clothes are only good for homeless people? What? Wouldn’t it be more appropriate to take the clothes you love and give them to the homeless? If you HAD A&F clothes, in the first place, it’s because you bought into the implicit image they were presenting. Now that it’s explicit, you’re bailing?Ithink it says more about the consumer than the producer.