Wow. Encouraging murder. Good job.
Wow. Encouraging murder. Good job.
wow. wishing a man to be shot. How very nice of you.
Ever hunted in Africa? Probably not, you mention you eat what you hunt. This animal was not likely wasted. The local tribe will parse out the animal and use every useable piece. Even more than you probably do. I don’t disagree with an endangered animal part. If they are in fact (which I assume they are) endangered, regardless if the legislation is in effect or not. Hunters are conservationists, we save more natural habitat than any other organization. Further damaging a population is not in our best interest for future hunters, visitors, or our world all together.
The problem is the law is SO damn big that the legislators didn’t read it before passing it. (look up the size) Its effects will not be known for sometime, good or bad. Healthcare isn’t something that should be gambled with to this extend. They should have read the law (every law for that matter) and understood what it was, what it would do, and any other effects. If this turns out to be a bad law, democrats will pay big for it. but if its good, they will reap the rewards. Risk big win big.
First World Problem
Do you know the training it takes to be a cop? Or is that label just good enough for you?
The point? Is that guns in good hands prevent more lives lost. The point it that it is not the piece of metal it is the person. Focus on the people not the tool.
Ummm. Look at DC. New York. Cali. Chicago. AWB? Those are and did take guns away from people. It DID happen. Feinstein and Brady are fighting for it to happen.
More than one equals mass? Where did you get your education. Any loss is bad, but your point is bad
Wow, this shows how stupid Ryan and Buzzfeed really are. No federal regulation? Really? You know WHAT federal and state regulation that was in place. The DC gun ban, the navy yard gun ban. School gun ban. Shall I go on? Yes, bad people and good people tend to use similar items. The AR-15 has been used FAR more times for good/non killing than it has for killing. Just look at the FBI report on the last AWB ban. It was ineffective. Here is a fun link from the LA Times, you know, LA? Like California, not the most gun friendly state? Look at their report. http://articles.latimes.com/2005/jun/28/opinion/oe-lott28 In the future, perhaps a bit of googling or even asking a friend could save yourself from looking like a total fool. It is sad that people who are this stupid can hold a job at a business that wants to be considered reputable. Try again buzzfeed. Your pathetic biased reporting is getting old and sad.
Is it a dodge or maybe he hasn’t seen the video and knows nothing about it.
Fight away? You mean start a fight? Zimmerman hadn’t broke any laws either and Trayvon started the fight, yes he may have be scared if Zimmerman was following him and got to close, but we don’t know this. Thats the point, if Zimmerman didn’t have a gun, he may be dead and Trayvon may be the one saying that Zimmerman followed and attacked him. Point is, you don’t know what happened beyond a reasonable doubt, you only believe what your side of the aisle believes. six jury members and most attorneys on TV said the same thing. The prosecution didn’t prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. They went for political gain, tried to hide evidence (fact), tried to wait until the last minute to spring stuff on the defense and overall acted unethical and unprofessional. Want to blame anyone, blame the prosecution, if they had chosen correct charges, then Zimmerman may have been found guilty. They took a big risk in order to get a big reward and it cost Trayvon’s family. They were gambling with someone else’s money.
Robocop? While I don’t disagree that Zimmerman shouldn’t have “followed” (which was still debated and actually not known) he still hadn’t broken any laws either. I believe that neighborhood is a gated community and zimmerman was monitoring it. And it was late night, someone walking around with their hood up when its not cold or raining in a neighborhood that had a recent increase in burglaries, that is suspicious. Everyone says Zimmerman should have done this, but what about Trayvon, he could have just kept walking and left the neighborhood just as well. These tragedies are never just one error, its a combination of several factors that led to this event. Just because some people would rather sit on their butts and do nothing while their neighborhoods are trashed and let the police do everything (good luck), some try to keep an eye out.
He had a firearm for protection, from someone who might attack him and slam his head into the pavement over & over. If his intention was to kill from the beginning why even make the call? Why not just walk up to the kid and shoot him? See, your logic is flawed. FYI it wasn’t 911.
Wow. Way to rip off reddit and not give any credit. Pathetic.
Fucking trolls of buzzfeed keep posting this stupid ass article
Way to rip off reddit
Ya he also thinks he can survive on candy I bet. Way to indoctrinate kids.
Is anyone else’s post to FB not working?
Surely the author wasn’t so dumb they didn’t adjust for inflation.