<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
>

<channel>
<title>BuzzFeed  - MohammedShariff</title>
<link>http://buzzfeed.com/mohammeds4</link>
<description>BuzzFeed, Find Your New Favorite Thing</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 BuzzFeed, Inc.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:54:26 -0400</lastBuildDate>
<managingEditor>editor@buzzfeed.com (http://www.buzzfeed.com/about)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>info@buzzfeed.com (http://www.buzzfeed.com/about)</webMaster>
<atom:link href="http://buzzfeed.com/mohammeds4.xml" rel="self" />
<atom:link href="http://buzzfeed.superfeedr.com/" rel="hub" />


<item>
<title>Microsoft Vs Apple Will Always Be A Flawed Battle</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/mohammeds4/microsoft-vs-apple-will-always-be-a-flawed-battle-6cl0</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>Microsoft as a word is just such a turn off.</p>




 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web04/2012/6/20/0/enhanced-buzz-18529-1340165323-6.jpg" width="625" height="368" alt="" /></p>
 
	


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://cdn4.diggstatic.com/story/microsoft_can_t_catch_a_break_pic/o.png" class="">cdn4.diggstatic.com</a></small></p>










]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/mohammeds4/microsoft-vs-apple-will-always-be-a-flawed-battle-6cl0</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:10:46 -0400</pubDate>
<media:content isDefault="true">
  <media:description type="html">Microsoft as a word is just such a turn off.</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">mohammeds4</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">adult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/web05/2012/6/20/0/microsoft-vs-apple-will-always-be-a-flawed-battle-1-20782-1340165446-1.jpg" width="125" />
</media:content>
</item>
<item>
<title>The 17 Funniest Reactions To Hosni Mubarak&#x27;s Death On Twitter</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/mohammeds4/the-17-funniest-reactions-to-hosni-mubaraks-d-6cl0</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>Zombie jokes aside, of course.</p>




 <p>Its unknown whether or not Hosni Mubarak, ousted leader of Egypt, is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/19/hosni-mubarak-clinically-dead_n_1610343.html">alive or not</a>. He&#39;s either A) dead B) in a coma C) In a secure US facility. Either way, here are some of the funniest reactions to his "death" (?) Oh twitter!</p>


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/19/hosni-mubarak-clinically-dead_n_1610343.html" class="">huffingtonpost.com</a></small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>17.</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal05/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-932-1340162766-9.jpg" width="519" height="88" alt="17." /></p>
 
	











 
 
 
	<h1>16.</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web04/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-17626-1340162921-2.jpg" width="625" height="122" alt="16." /></p>
 
	











 
 
 
	<h1>15.</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web04/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-16242-1340162934-4.jpg" width="498" height="95" alt="15." /></p>
 
	






<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/mohammeds4/the-17-funniest-reactions-to-hosni-mubaraks-d-6cl0">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/mohammeds4/the-17-funniest-reactions-to-hosni-mubaraks-d-6cl0</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:37:43 -0400</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">Zombie jokes aside, of course.</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">mohammeds4</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">adult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/web04/2012/6/19/23/the-17-funniest-reactions-to-hosni-mubaraks-death-1-23610-1340164508-0.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content isDefault="true">
    <media:description type="html">Its unknown whether or not Hosni Mubarak, ousted leader of Egypt, is &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/19/hosni-mubarak-clinically-dead_n_1610343.html&#x22;&#x3E;alive or not&#x3C;/a&#x3E;. He&#x26;#39;s either A) dead B) in a coma C) In a secure US facility. Either way, here are some of the funniest reactions to his &#x22;death&#x22; (?) Oh twitter!</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="88" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal05/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-932-1340162766-9.jpg" width="519">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="122" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web04/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-17626-1340162921-2.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="95" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web04/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-16242-1340162934-4.jpg" width="498">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="72" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web05/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-13188-1340162963-4.jpg" width="501">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="93" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web05/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-12036-1340162994-6.jpg" width="516">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="110" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web04/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-19261-1340163004-9.jpg" width="516">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="90" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web05/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-12063-1340163013-3.jpg" width="520">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="95" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal05/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-2448-1340163024-2.jpg" width="521">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="81" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal05/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-1398-1340163034-4.jpg" width="521">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="95" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web05/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-12555-1340163052-7.jpg" width="523">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="93" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web05/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-13106-1340163062-2.jpg" width="520">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="92" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web03/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-21384-1340163073-2.jpg" width="526">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="93" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal05/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-1398-1340163081-6.jpg" width="520">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="89" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web03/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-369-1340163092-17.jpg" width="399">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="97" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web05/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-12567-1340163101-4.jpg" width="524">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="82" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal05/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-2579-1340162980-8.jpg" width="494">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="70" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal05/2012/6/19/23/enhanced-buzz-2636-1340163194-11.jpg" width="508">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
<item>
<title>20 Grand In 64 Minutes</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/mohammeds4/20-grand-in-64-minutes-6cl0</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>Matthew Inman, of TheOatmeal webcomic, probably has the greatest comeback ever.</p>




 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web03/2012/6/12/21/enhanced-buzz-4586-1339549791-4.jpg" width="625" height="452" alt="" /></p>
 
	


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/mom-on-bear.png" class="">cdn.arstechnica.net</a></small></p>









 <p>Some of you may be following the dispute between web content aggregator FunnyJunk and popular webcomic theOatmeal. Basically, <a href="http://theoatmeal.com/blog/funnyjunk">last June</a>, theOatmeal creator, Matt Inman, posted a blog complaining that a number of his comics were posted in their entirety on FunnyJunk without attribution. "I know that if FunnyJunk disappeared, 50 other clones would pop up to take its place overnight, but I felt I had to say something about what they&#39;re doing" he said.</p><p>FunnyJunk responded by telling it users that theOatmeal was threatning to sue and "shut down" their website and that they "contact Oatmeal anyway you can." Inman of course, had simply delivered a "Cease and Desist" letter as is customary with Digital Millennium Copyright Association procedure. Nevertheless, his Facebook was "trolled" by fans of FunnyJunk. Eventually, FunnyJunk removed some of the material (albeit only the correctly attributed ones) and the situation was thought to be over. </p><p>That all changed on June 10th, when an attorney representing FunnyJunk contacted Inman, claiming his blog post was defamation and that he had to pay $20,000 or risk a lawsuit. This of course, after FunnyJunk profited off of stolen theOatmeal comics. </p><p>Attorney Charles Carreon alleged that theOatmeal had maliciously manipulated SEO in order for his blog post to come up whenever FunnyJunk was searched on Google, and that he had intentionally misled readers to believe that FunnyJunk hadn&#39;t yet removed the links (even though there is <a href="http://theoatmeal.com/blog/funnyjunk2">another blogpost</a> refuting this).</p>


 <p><small></small></p>









 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal05/2012/6/12/21/enhanced-buzz-17324-1339550155-0.jpg" width="625" height="384" alt="" /></p>
 
	


 <p><small>Via: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://theoatmeal.com/blog/funnyjunk_letter" class="">theoatmeal.com</a></small></p>









 <p>Inman responded by saying that he "(didn&#39;t) want to get tied up in courtroom nonsense." Instead, he started a donation drive on Indiegogo to raise the $20,000, promising to send one half to the National Wildlife Federation and the other to the American Cancer Society. Inman said he would also send FunnyJunk a photo of the raised money and a picture of the lawyer&#39;s mother seducing a Kodiak bear.</p><p>The operation, dubbed <a href="http://www.indiegogo.com/bearlovegood">BearLove Good Cancer Bad,</a> reached its goal within a mere <a href="http://www.indiegogo.com/bearlovegood?c=activity">64</a> minutes, and had raised roughly $100,000 at the 24 hour mark. As of this post, it has raised $127,776 with 14 days left of the drive.</p><p>The incident has <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/06/lawyer-demands-20000-so-webcomic-raises-100000-from-the-internet/">sparked</a> debate over the effectiveness of DCMA policing and the morality of user upload based websites. Even now, Viacom is engaged in a lawsuit with Youtube over the very same accusations. Although according to Inman, all FunnyJunk had to do was correctly attribute the comics to him, "Just proper attribution; just give me a link!" <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/06/funnyjunk-vs-the-oatmeal/">he told</a> Arstechnica. </p><p>Whatever the case, FunnyJunk now has a lot more controversy than it originally banked on.</p>


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://theoatmeal.com/blog/funnyjunk_letter" class="">theoatmeal.com</a></small></p>




<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/mohammeds4/20-grand-in-64-minutes-6cl0">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/mohammeds4/20-grand-in-64-minutes-6cl0</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:39:12 -0400</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">Matthew Inman, of TheOatmeal webcomic, probably has the greatest comeback ever.</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">mohammeds4</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">adult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/web03/2012/6/14/13/20-grand-in-64-minutes-1-27452-1339696789-0.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content height="452" isDefault="true" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web03/2012/6/12/21/enhanced-buzz-4586-1339549791-4.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">Some of you may be following the dispute between web content aggregator FunnyJunk and popular webcomic theOatmeal. Basically, &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://theoatmeal.com/blog/funnyjunk&#x22;&#x3E;last June&#x3C;/a&#x3E;, theOatmeal creator, Matt Inman, posted a blog complaining that a number of his comics were posted in their entirety on FunnyJunk without attribution. &#x22;I know that if FunnyJunk disappeared, 50 other clones would pop up to take its place overnight, but I felt I had to say something about what they&#x26;#39;re doing&#x22; he said.

FunnyJunk responded by telling it users that theOatmeal was threatning to sue and &#x22;shut down&#x22; their website and that they &#x22;contact Oatmeal anyway you can.&#x22; Inman of course, had simply delivered a &#x22;Cease and Desist&#x22; letter as is customary with Digital Millennium Copyright Association procedure. Nevertheless, his Facebook was &#x22;trolled&#x22; by fans of FunnyJunk. Eventually, FunnyJunk removed some of the material (albeit only the correctly attributed ones) and the situation was thought to be over. 

That all changed on June 10th, when an attorney representing FunnyJunk contacted Inman, claiming his blog post was defamation and that he had to pay $20,000 or risk a lawsuit. This of course, after FunnyJunk profited off of stolen theOatmeal comics. 

Attorney Charles Carreon alleged that theOatmeal had maliciously manipulated SEO in order for his blog post to come up whenever FunnyJunk was searched on Google, and that he had intentionally misled readers to believe that FunnyJunk hadn&#x26;#39;t yet removed the links (even though there is &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://theoatmeal.com/blog/funnyjunk2&#x22;&#x3E;another blogpost&#x3C;/a&#x3E; refuting this).</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="384" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal05/2012/6/12/21/enhanced-buzz-17324-1339550155-0.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">Inman responded by saying that he &#x22;(didn&#x26;#39;t) want to get tied up in courtroom nonsense.&#x22; Instead, he started a donation drive on Indiegogo to raise the $20,000, promising to send one half to the National Wildlife Federation and the other to the American Cancer Society. Inman said he would also send FunnyJunk a photo of the raised money and a picture of the lawyer&#x26;#39;s mother seducing a Kodiak bear.

The operation, dubbed &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.indiegogo.com/bearlovegood&#x22;&#x3E;BearLove Good Cancer Bad,&#x3C;/a&#x3E; reached its goal within a mere &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.indiegogo.com/bearlovegood?c=activity&#x22;&#x3E;64&#x3C;/a&#x3E; minutes, and had raised roughly $100,000 at the 24 hour mark. As of this post, it has raised $127,776 with 14 days left of the drive.

The incident has &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/06/lawyer-demands-20000-so-webcomic-raises-100000-from-the-internet/&#x22;&#x3E;sparked&#x3C;/a&#x3E; debate over the effectiveness of DCMA policing and the morality of user upload based websites. Even now, Viacom is engaged in a lawsuit with Youtube over the very same accusations. Although according to Inman, all FunnyJunk had to do was correctly attribute the comics to him, &#x22;Just proper attribution; just give me a link!&#x22; &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/06/funnyjunk-vs-the-oatmeal/&#x22;&#x3E;he told&#x3C;/a&#x3E; Arstechnica. 

Whatever the case, FunnyJunk now has a lot more controversy than it originally banked on.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">&#x3C;i&#x3E;Edit:&#x3C;/i&#x3E; &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://digitallife.today.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/12/12187665-cartoonist-turns-lawsuit-threat-into-100k-charity-fundraiser?lite&#x22;&#x3E;MSNBC&#x3C;/a&#x3E; got in contact with Anthony Carreon, the attorney representing FunnyJunk. 

Apparently he has removed his contact information because of a high level of &#x22;obscene&#x22; letters. &#x22;I really did not expect that he would marshal an army of people who would besiege my website and send me a string of obscene emails,&#x22; he said 
&#x22;I&#x26;#39;m completely unfamiliar really with this style of responding to a legal threat &#x26;mdash; I&#x26;#39;ve never really seen it before.&#x22; &#x22;I don&#x26;#39;t like seeing anyone referring to my mother as a sexual deviant,&#x22; he added. 

But perhaps most amusing, is MSNBC&#x26;#39;s treatment of the FunnyJunk postcard (our header image).</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="598" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web05/2012/6/14/13/enhanced-buzz-20570-1339696597-2.jpg" width="500">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">Finally, Carreon sent a C&#x26;amp;D letter to Indiegogo, because the drive is technically not allowed on a investment website. Considering the 100K is going towards charity, that&#x26;#39;s kind of a dick move.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
<item>
<title>Paintball Warfare- New Viral Video Alert!</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/mohammeds4/paintball-warfare-new-viral-video-alert-6cl0</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>Cinematographer, Devin Super Tramp, takes Paintball to the extreme with his latest viral video.</p>





 
 
	

	 	  <iframe width="560" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/d_z2CA-o13U" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
	  
	<p>On Monday, May 28th, cinematographer DevinSuperTramp (also known as Devin Graham) released his most recent project, an epic 3 minute long paintball game of Capture the Flag.</p>











 <p>The video will likely remind Community fans of the Seasons 2 and 3 episodes, "Modern Warfare" and "For a Few Paintballs More", which also featured massive paintball battles. All in all, 100,000 paint balls were fired during the video&#39;s production, which also featured a paraglider, a mounted turret, multiple jeeps and dirtbikes, and what seems like a paintball bazooka gun. </p><p>The video has accumulated 2.7 million views in the past two weeks alone. And although it may be scripted (there&#39;s a "Behind the Scenes" follow-up coming soon), real-life events such as <i>The Paintball War</i> meet every year to engage in a massive, 24 hour long, paintball battle.</p>


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_z2CA-o13U&feature=player_embedded" class="has_icon icon_youtube">youtube.com</a> &nbsp;/&nbsp; via: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.holytaco.com/the-morning-jolt-paintball-war/" class="">holytaco.com</a></small></p>









 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web03/2012/6/8/17/enhanced-buzz-21079-1339192697-8.jpg" width="625" height="352" alt="" /></p>
 
	<p>A jeep flies off a ramp as a para glider flies above.</p>











 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal05/2012/6/8/17/enhanced-buzz-17945-1339192778-33.jpg" width="625" height="352" alt="" /></p>
 
	<p>The Red Team mobilizes.</p>






<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/mohammeds4/paintball-warfare-new-viral-video-alert-6cl0">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/mohammeds4/paintball-warfare-new-viral-video-alert-6cl0</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:05:24 -0400</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">Cinematographer, Devin Super Tramp, takes Paintball to the extreme with his latest viral video.</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">mohammeds4</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">adult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/web05/2012/6/8/18/paintball-warfare-new-viral-video-alert-1-21199-1339194287-0.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content isDefault="true" medium="video">
    <media:description type="html">On Monday, May 28th, cinematographer DevinSuperTramp (also known as Devin Graham) released his most recent project, an epic 3 minute long paintball game of Capture the Flag.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
    <media:player url="http://youtube.com/watch?v=d_z2CA-o13U" />
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">The video will likely remind Community fans of the Seasons 2 and 3 episodes, &#x22;Modern Warfare&#x22; and &#x22;For a Few Paintballs More&#x22;, which also featured massive paintball battles. All in all, 100,000 paint balls were fired during the video&#x26;#39;s production, which also featured a paraglider, a mounted turret, multiple jeeps and dirtbikes, and what seems like a paintball bazooka gun. 

The video has accumulated 2.7 million views in the past two weeks alone. And although it may be scripted (there&#x26;#39;s a &#x22;Behind the Scenes&#x22; follow-up coming soon), real-life events such as &#x3C;i&#x3E;The Paintball War&#x3C;/i&#x3E; meet every year to engage in a massive, 24 hour long, paintball battle.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="352" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web03/2012/6/8/17/enhanced-buzz-21079-1339192697-8.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">A jeep flies off a ramp as a para glider flies above.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="352" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal05/2012/6/8/17/enhanced-buzz-17945-1339192778-33.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">The Red Team mobilizes.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="352" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web05/2012/6/8/18/enhanced-buzz-18949-1339192863-0.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">The two teams clash in a flurry of paint balls.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
<item>
<title>Could This Be What The iPhone 5 Will Look Like?</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/mohammeds4/could-this-be-what-the-iphone-5-will-look-like-6cl0</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>Leaked schematics of a (purportedly) new iPhone 5 design prompted TechnoBuffalo to create a pretty realistic mock up.</p>




 <p>Earlier <a href="http://www.technobuffalo.com/companies/apple/iphone/more-photos-leak-of-the-new-iphones-alleged-back-panel/">this week,</a> leaked schematics of what may be the new design of the rumored iPhone 5 leaked online. <a href="http://www.technobuffalo.com/companies/apple/iphone/iphone-5-schematic/">A day later</a>, on May 30th, the schematics of the what may be the front followed suit. Using the pretty detailed (and official Apple logo stamped) blueprints as a basis, tech website TechnoBuffalo decided to create a mock-up of the device as it would compare to the current iPhone 4S. </p><p>Perhaps you&#39;re asking why they went through the trouble of what may be just another baseless rumor. After all, Apple hasn&#39;t confirmed whether or not the designs are theirs or not. According to TechnoBuffalo, the schematics line up <i>exactly</i> with the (alleged) iPhone 5 parts that also leaked on May 29th. Furthermore, the schematics are apparently immensely detailed, a task incredibly time consuming and unlikely for a fake model.</p><p>All that said, here are their results.</p>


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.technobuffalo.com/companies/apple/iphone/iphone-5-putting-the-leaks-and-rumors-to-the-test/" class="">technobuffalo.com</a></small></p>









 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal05/2012/6/4/1/enhanced-buzz-26010-1338786582-3.jpg" width="625" height="369" alt="" /></p>
 
	<p>The schematics line up perfectly with the leaked parts</p>


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.technobuffalo.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/iphone-5-part-leak-schematic-640x378.jpg" class="">technobuffalo.com</a></small></p>









 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal05/2012/6/4/1/enhanced-buzz-25177-1338786654-4.jpg" width="625" height="469" alt="" /></p>
 
	<p>A rendered image of the iPhone 5 from the blueprints side by side with an iPhone 4S.</p>


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.technobuffalo.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/iphone-5-mock-compared-to-4s-640x480.jpg" class="">technobuffalo.com</a></small></p>









 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web03/2012/6/4/1/enhanced-buzz-9100-1338786704-11.jpg" width="625" height="416" alt="" /></p>
 
	<p>And if you&#39;re wondering how the device might fit in your hand, TechnoBuffalo has you covered.</p>


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.technobuffalo.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/iPhone-5-Cut-Out-002-640x426.jpg" class="">technobuffalo.com</a></small></p>




<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/mohammeds4/could-this-be-what-the-iphone-5-will-look-like-6cl0">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/mohammeds4/could-this-be-what-the-iphone-5-will-look-like-6cl0</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 01:07:56 -0400</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">Leaked schematics of a (purportedly) new iPhone 5 design prompted TechnoBuffalo to create a pretty realistic mock up.</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">mohammeds4</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">adult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/terminal05/2012/6/8/18/could-this-be-what-the-iphone-5-will-look-like-1-22931-1339194292-0.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content isDefault="true">
    <media:description type="html">Earlier &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.technobuffalo.com/companies/apple/iphone/more-photos-leak-of-the-new-iphones-alleged-back-panel/&#x22;&#x3E;this week,&#x3C;/a&#x3E; leaked schematics of what may be the new design of the rumored iPhone 5 leaked online. &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.technobuffalo.com/companies/apple/iphone/iphone-5-schematic/&#x22;&#x3E;A day later&#x3C;/a&#x3E;, on May 30th, the schematics of the what may be the front followed suit. Using the pretty detailed (and official Apple logo stamped) blueprints as a basis, tech website TechnoBuffalo decided to create a mock-up of the device as it would compare to the current iPhone 4S. 

Perhaps you&#x26;#39;re asking why they went through the trouble of what may be just another baseless rumor. After all, Apple hasn&#x26;#39;t confirmed whether or not the designs are theirs or not. According to TechnoBuffalo, the schematics line up &#x3C;i&#x3E;exactly&#x3C;/i&#x3E; with the (alleged) iPhone 5 parts that also leaked on May 29th. Furthermore, the schematics are apparently immensely detailed, a task incredibly time consuming and unlikely for a fake model.

All that said, here are their results.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="369" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal05/2012/6/4/1/enhanced-buzz-26010-1338786582-3.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">The schematics line up perfectly with the leaked parts</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="469" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal05/2012/6/4/1/enhanced-buzz-25177-1338786654-4.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">A rendered image of the iPhone 5 from the blueprints side by side with an iPhone 4S.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="416" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web03/2012/6/4/1/enhanced-buzz-9100-1338786704-11.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">And if you&#x26;#39;re wondering how the device might fit in your hand, TechnoBuffalo has you covered.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="469" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web03/2012/6/4/1/enhanced-buzz-8318-1338786748-5.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">Full iPhone 5 mock up, courtesy of TechnoBuffalo.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">Altogether, the supposed new iPhone will have a height and diagonal increase by 0.3 inches and .5 inches respectively, putting it at a total 4.8 inches in height and 4 inches diagonal. That would be up from the iPhone 4S which has a 4.5 inch height and 3.5 inch diagonal.

So, what do you think? Is this another fake or is the iPhone getting a little taller?</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>