Culture Buzz These pictures should give you a pretty good idea of what AwkwardFamilyPhotos.com would've looked like 100 years ago. It starts out cute, but turns ugly and creepy fast…
If the reaction “wow” existed here, I might even click. But I guess it's too old fashioned unfortunately. (Thanks to Tia for linking me here, I belong with these photos. I wish I knew all their stories.)
Family photo.
Smiling in photographs wasn't always the convention. The model for early portrait photography was the painted portrait—in which the dignified, timeless quality that was desired would have been undermined by rendering the subject as insanely happy for no apparent reason. Besides, there's something to be said for family albums that don't consist of dozens and dozens of images of people feigning boundless joy for the camera. At the very least, the ubiquitous mirthful grins and slack-jawed, sedated expressions of total contentment adopted by the subjects of modern photos are no more unnatural and strange than the solemn poses that were the norm in photography's early days. As for what we are apparently supposed to perceive as the unintended and unfortunate homoerotic nature of some of the photos: Again, it's only relatively recently in American cultural history that physical closeness and expressions of affection between men became taboo. It was during WWI and the period between the Wars that this taboo was constructed and cemented into place. Before that, the fear that the label “homosexual” would be attached to a man who was seen to be physically intimate with another man simply did not exist. Men and women of the era before hyper-masculinity as a defense mechanism was the norm would have thought it ludicrous to suggest that men (or women) such as those in the photos above were what *we* would call homosexual. For them, it was common for men to love one another and to express such emotions physically—but the idea of such men possessing a same-sex orientation would never have even occurred to them. They didn't have a word for such a thing because it did not exist for them—and because it did not exist for them, they did not have a word for it. The men in the photos were (are) men who love each other, and express that love publicly without fear of being thought of as lovers in our modern understanding of that word.
Where's the NEXT button? I want to see more. GOOD STUFF!
Really? I'm the first one to use the “old” tag? You people are humorless!
#17 must have been taken after 1946. Weeki Wachee Springs didn't become a tourist attraction until then.
These aren't people…they are DEMONS!
![[link]](http://s-ec-sm.buzzfeed.com/static/images/public/icons/external-link2.png){kind=icon}
hangoverbeard.com
Golly, I can't pick a favorite!
blogs.nerve.com
OK #5………… 0_0
#05 is from the early 60s.
Prohibition = no smiling.
All my nightmares realized on one Buzzfeed page.
#18 will haunt my dreams for days.
So thanks.
Was smiling illegal before 1930?
It started out awkward and then just got into scary, come-out-of-the-screen-and-use-my-powers-to-make-you-a-member-of-my-wooden-puppet-family territory.
these are amazing pictures! i must marry a man who will grow a deadlocked beard and will stuff frightened kitties in said dread-locked beard
Too funny—have you looked at our old family albums cause I dare say—could easily fit!
French illustrators love women, and I love them for that. Here'…
Either a horrible name, or a truly epic restaurant.
Rather than compete in the Super Bowl's “manliest ad” fight, Ol…
BRB…getting my LEGOs.
It's quite clear what the frogman community thinks about the Go…
Simon Cowell's new girlfriend Mezhgan Hussainy is a bit older t…
A Saints fan left her favorite fleur-de-lis earring next to her med…
The Colts are sooo gay.
Bob Costas On Ice picks the most memorable faceplants in Olympic hi…
This dog has no idea how cute he really is!
Kate Gosselin ditched the angry possum and went for long locks…
GOING VIRAL ONlimelife
Get the DVR ready - she is loud and proud.
GOING VIRAL ONvideogum
Respond
Love?
Your Reaction?
Make It Viral