am stunned this would actually beadefense to ownership of women by men
is thereareverse proposition
1. Admonishing HIM ie. talking to HIM. Reason with HIM like the intellectual human being that HE is.
2. Not sharingabed with him ie. cutting off sexual relations.
3. Beat HIM lightly. This ‘beating’ (there is no lighter word for it in English) is to simply be the point where you clearly want to draw the line. It is NOT intended to injure HIM, much less almost kill HIM.
Until Islam provides equal protection for women your observation is ironic at best, truthful at worst, and in no way presagesademocracy that includes women on an equal footing. Islam does not seem to have any idea thatawoman isahuman being, equal to her husband. Until such rights given to man are given to woman, your argument isasieve.