> I think that science reveals ever more places where God has reached out and touched existence. If one looks at science as a way of revealing the secrets of the universe, and God being the cause of that universe, then this can work. In that point in the post, I was referring to people who try to say that the things science doesn’t understand yet can’t ever be understood by science, and are therefore solely the realm of the supernatural. > Good kind and moral people are welcome in most places. Agreed. > Atheists rely on faith to deny god because they can no more prove that God does not exist than the faithful can prove he does.  There are people who claim that God does not exist for a fact. I think you’re correct in saying that claim requires faith as well, but I’d also say that the majority of atheists simply claim that they have not yet witnessed sufficient evidence to support the claim, “God definitely exists,” and are waiting for more evidence to be presented before making a definitive judgement. I am one of those people, but I believe that the existence of an intelligent, extra-dimensional creator being that has a personal interest in my specific life is highly unlikely.  > Atheists are actually quite buggered, because I can not see how one can deny the existence of something whose existence one is trying to dismiss. Does denying the existence of unicorns bugger me as well?