Close
0
0
0
MILES
UP
UP

The Anti-Spotify Music App

The music app you should be using.

I know, right? Now tell your friends!
The Anti-Spotify Music App
Matt Buchanan

The catalog for Rdio isn’t as vast or deep as Spotify’s. It’s missing some stuff I want to listen to, like Maserati’s new album. But it’s my preferred subscription music service — true for most of the other tech writers I hang out with as well — because the product and experience is vastly better than Spotify’s, and it’s the social music service, integrating what your friends are listening to in a way that feels totally organic. And those are things I care about even more than a few missing cuts. Today there’s a new version of Rdio for iPhone and Android, a complete redesign that’s faster and cleaner still — making it even more antithetical to Spotify’s overwhelming approach to app design and experience.

By “clean,” I don’t just mean the new Rdio app is uncluttered — its predominant color palette is so white that it almost sparkles, and the crisp fonts have little weight or heft to them. The sensation is a little bit like peppermint chewing gum. The app’s architecture should feel familiar to anybody’s who’s used other iOS apps though, since it uses the near-ubiquitous sliding panel interface seen in Facebook’s app and others to reduce the interface for most of the app’s higher-level functions down to a single side panel. I’d say it’s a design choice that’s beginning to feel a little too conventional for iOS apps, perhaps, except that it does make navigation incredibly quick and direct, particularly for accessing playlists, syncing and going to offline mode, which were previously buried under a series of menus in Rdio.

There aren’t really many new features, which is mostly fine, except that I think the service still badly needs a private listening mode so anyone can listen to any music, no matter how terrible, without shame. It’s an odd omission, in a sense, since otherwise Rdio gets social better than anybody else in the space. And privacy — the right kind of privacy — is a huge part of social.

As glorious as the redesign may be, though, one wonders how long Rdio can survive in the business, as one of the smaller fishes in the toxic sea that is the music industry. Other, lesser music services have already fallen. Rdio doesn’t really talk about how many users it has, but AppData estimates just 140,000 monthly active users connected to Facebook, while it estimates that Spotify has over 24 million. A Topsy search of Twitter shows just 22,000 tweets about Rdio in the last month, compared with over a million for Spotify, which had around 15 million active users as of August. Rdio’s also paying artists to bring in new subscribers, a seemingly strange practice in an environment where Pandora loses money on tens of millions of dollars in revenue and Spotify’s losses mount to $60 million on revenues of nearly a quarter billion dollars in 2011, precisely because of how much streaming services pay record labels (and less so, artists). So it doesn’t look very good for Rdio.

I hope it lives, and this new app is precisely one of the reasons why. But increasingly I think the only way that might happen is if Microsoft follows through on vague rumors that it’s in talks to buy the service (Microsoft bought Skype, and Rdio is founded by some of the same dudes, so it wouldn’t be crazy). In the meantime, while the going’s still good, you can give it a whirl here.

Check out more articles on BuzzFeed.com!

Facebook Conversations
          
    • Lakenpoprock   The Anti-Spotify Music App  about 6 months ago
    • eddiefu   The Anti-Spotify Music App  about 6 months ago
    • sarahm51   The Anti-Spotify Music App  about 6 months ago
    • jimmym9   The Anti-Spotify Music App  about 6 months ago
    • itmustbeken 6 months ago

      Was this ‘adicle’ (ad + article = adicle…see what I did there?) written by the marketing department of Rdio? If not, I’m sure you ‘gee, thanks’ note and complimentary t-shirt from their VP of Sales is on its way.
      Jeeesh…

    • hellosuperman thinks The Anti-Spotify Music App is Fail  about 6 months ago
    • morganvelociraptorc thinks The Anti-Spotify Music App is Fail  about 6 months ago
    • zselmon 6 months ago

      Rdio does great stuff… Spotify sucked me in because they still offer a desktop app that can play my existing itunes library. I wish I could go all streaming all the time… but there’s still a lot of stuff, old AND new, that’s never going to be on ANY of the streaming services.

    • I’m currently in a BBB dispute with RDIO. If you subscribe in app, they charge you 15$, if you subscribe in their site it’s only $10. The reason for the $5 difference, “iTunes charges us a percentage, so we pass the expense on to you. Without telling you.” Despicable. Don’t give these people your money!

    • marys27 6 months ago

      better than grooveshark (which I currently subscribe to)?

    • Emu thinks The Anti-Spotify Music App is Fail  about 6 months ago
    • JrBobDobbs 6 months ago

      I tried Rdio for a day once. After every album I played, it started playing a One Direction song. NEVER. AGAIN.

    • staceyl3 thinks The Anti-Spotify Music App is Fail  about 6 months ago
    • stefanr4   The Anti-Spotify Music App and thinks it’s Fail  about 6 months ago
    • Andrew Gauthier thinks The Anti-Spotify Music App is Win  about 6 months ago
    • Mike Jansen thinks The Anti-Spotify Music App is Fail  about 6 months ago
    • The Anti-Spotify Music App was rebuzzed by sfwtech  about 6 months ago
    • dodgrile 6 months ago

      Wow, this. First, some disclosure about the relationship between BuzzFeed and Rdio seems warranted. Second, if the primary difference between Spotify and Rdio is design, how would that make Rdio the “anti-Spotify”? Because to me their business models seem basically identical. My basic objection to Spotify is that model and how it screws over any musician with fewer listeners than somebody like Rihanna— which is why it’s hilarious that you say “Spotify’s losses mount to $60 million on revenues of nearly a quarter billion dollars in 2011, precisely because of how much streaming services pay record labels and artists.” It turns out that Spotify is maybe not so generous in paying the creators of music. Could it be that the model underlying these services simply doesn’t work? Here’s a good piece by Damon Krukowski from the indie rock band Galaxie 500 about his experiences with Spotify: http://pitchfork.com/features/articles/8993-the-cloud/ A lot of the tech writing on this sight feels like “advertorializing,” and this is no exception. Why not get into the interesting issues involved in this stuff, instead of just waxing superficially about how “clean” the redesign is?

      • dodgrile 6 months ago

        “A lot of the tech writing on this site*…”, excuse me. I also seem to have messed up that link, so let me try again: http://pitchfork.com/features/articles/8993-the-cloud/

      • Matt Buchanan 6 months ago

        I don’t know or care about the relationship BuzzFeed has with Rdio; editorial is produced and run separately from advertising. I don’t know what they’re doing, they don’t know what I’m doing.  I wrote this specifically about the new app because it’s one I like a lot. That’s what we do with products we like at FWD, and that’s what most consumer-oriented tech writing is about — products, the things people use. And while the Spotify and Rdio services are similar in the sense that they’re both subscription music services, my headline, and this piece, are very much about the app.  We’ve talked about some of the issues here, if you’re looking for that. And you’re probably correct that the model’s not sustainable, which we talked about a bit here. In the end it’ll probably be just Spotify remaining, precisely for that reason, and the reasons laid out in the piece you linked to.

      • dodgrile 6 months ago

        Thanks for the response. You’re right, my beef is probably more with consumer tech writing in general. “Anti-Spotify” still seems a bit hyperbolic to me, but to be fair so was my objection, and headlines are headlines I guess. Thanks too for linking to that piece by Allison McCann— it’s a thoughtful take and I enjoyed it. It’s also good to know about separation between editorial and advertising. I think my skepticism is understandable, given the way BuzzFeed (and to be fair, the so-called “social web” in general) seems to intentionally blur the line between person and corporate entity (for example, Geico and the incessant sharing of “delightful” things over the past few weeks). I guess what I’m saying is that advertising is built into the structure of the site in a way that isn’t always obvious, and sometimes this makes me doubt a writer’s intent when I shouldn’t.

    Hot Buzz

    8 Foods We Eat In The U.S. That Are Banned In Other Countries

    viral

    21 Heartwarming And Beautiful Facts About Mr. Rogers That Will Brighten Even The Crummi...

    viral
    Now Buzzing