Close
0
0
0
MILES
UP
UP

Why It’s So Hard To Talk About Bareback Sex

With more than 50% of gay men no longer using condoms consistently, the shame that often prevents candid discussion of bareback sex may prove to be as dangerous as the health risks themselves.

I know, right? Now tell your friends!
Why It's So Hard To Talk About Barebac...
Kyle Bella

Image by Chris Ritter/Buzzfeed

I had been living in New York City just long enough to know about the risks of bareback sex, the statistics, the history, and the ghosts. This is not a cautionary tale; this is about a decision I made, and keep making.

In October 2010, I met a guy online who was visiting from France. That night, after meeting in a midtown Starbucks, we went to his hotel room. I never asked about his HIV status. I watched him do a line of coke in the bathroom, and even knowing that, knowing he was some unfamiliar man doing things I never envisioned myself doing, we fucked each other without condoms. And it felt good. This was the scariest part for me. Not the risk itself, but the fact that I enjoyed it.

The next morning, as I rushed to throw on my clothes to get to work on time, it all came rushing back: the risks, the statistics, the history. And, along with them, the names of authors I’d read who wrote during the onset of the AIDS crisis. I felt ashamed that I was doing something that would put me at risk of an incurable illness, felt ashamed because I knew people in my own life who I was close to who had struggled to come to terms with being HIV positive.

A few weeks later, as I sat in the waiting room of the GMHC, waiting for the results of my rapid HIV test, I wrote in my journal: “I’m here now, wondering if I have an incurable virus coursing through my veins. Wondering how my life will change inexorably if I do. Terrified because I wouldn’t ever give up that moment of pleasure. That I may, in fact, do it again.” Those 10 minutes were some of the longest moments of my life, and even though I felt so relieved at receiving an HIV-negative diagnosis, I’ve never stopped thinking about the consequences barebacking can have.

Two and half years later, during a recent regular three-month visit, the clinician in the HIV vaccine trial I’m part of — a study to discover how the HIV virus can be disrupted from attaching itself to cells — asked me the question, “How would you feel if you found out you were HIV positive?” I still can’t come up with an answer — and don’t think I ever could, unless I actually contracted HIV. Regardless, it’s a question any man who is having bareback sex with other men needs to ask when we are a long way off from a cure. Though it’s an impossible question to answer, it has forced me to think about the stigma that friends, relatives, and other figures continue to deal with because of their status. That’s important not because it will not necessarily dissuade me (or anyone else) from having bareback sex, but because it places the freedom that comes from fucking raw into what might happen when the rest of your life is bound to an incurable illness.

I refuse to use the words “unsafe sex” to describe barebacking. I believe it’s a phrase people use to make you feel ashamed about very real desires and habits you have. I will, however, use the word “risky” to describe the practices I have engaged in because I am aware of how to contract HIV, understand it’s incurable, and recognize how devastating it has been for millions. What I’m doing is not self-destructive, and it’s not because I’m too stupid to understand the early epidemic. I’ve seen We Were Here and How to Survive a Plague and still get teary-eyed thinking about images of activists raging against our government’s inaction. The half-sleeve tattoo I want to get is Keith Haring’s “Unfinished Painting,” 1989, which he painted just a few years before dying from AIDS.

Maybe others who bareback have no knowledge of this history or realize they have friends who struggle with the virus every day. But I do, and I’m talking about it because we can post as many articles as we want about how many men are barebacking without really asking why. Why is not an easy question, but it’s the only way we’re going to really feel comfortable talking about our desires. And if, as studies are starting to show, roughly half of all gay men bareback at some point, is it really that reckless? Are men who engage in barebacking sex really self-destructive, uneducated, or unfamiliar with the risk? I don’t think so, but the shame that stands between us and a candid conversation about bareback sex is perhaps as dangerous as the virus itself. I’ll probably bareback again, though I don’t know when or with whom. It is against my better judgment to take this risk, when the virus, even if I don’t have it personally, has invaded my vision of the world. But my desire doesn’t necessarily operate logically. It uses contact to determine where it heads next — the taste of lips together, the aroma of sweat, and yes, bare bodies as they intertwine.

This is why it is so hard to talk about barebacking. As contact against logic or reason, as sex that feels freeing but can have such permanent consequences, it should not be named, or cannot be named in a reasonable way. But for someone committed to staying HIV negative, committed to advancing HIV vaccine research, and studying the HIV/AIDS crisis intently, I want to know who else is out there who has fucked raw and wonders why that might happen, and continue to happen, despite the risk.

Check out more articles on BuzzFeed.com!

Facebook Conversations
          
    • leahj 3 months ago

      It’s not hard for people to talk about unsafe sex, it’s hard for people to talk about any behavior they willfully engage in knowing that doing so is harmful to them. It’s hard for people to talk about getting cancer because they don’t want to stop smoking, or changing their diet because they don’t want to get diabetes, or putting down their phones when they’re driving because they don’t want to get in an accident. Even harder is actually stopping those behaviors because doing those things feels good, and not doing them doesn’t feel good. Numbers and statistics, even when they’re scary, are distancing. Knowing that 1 in 5 will become infected with HIV won’t make you stop having unsafe sex, because even though you know the facts on an intellectual level, the reality isn’t real enough for you as an individual. You don’t think you could be the 1; you don’t even think you’re a part of the 5 because the risk isn’t real to you on an emotional level. Changing the words you use to describe your particular bad habits won’t change your actions are the reality of them - it will only further distance the very real consequences of your actions.

      • Kyle Bella 3 months ago

        “You don’t think you could be the 1; you don’t even think you’re a part of the 5 because the risk isn’t real to you on an emotional level.” The risk is real, very real, especially after the situation that started the above thoughts. A relative who has AIDS is in the hospital again with pneumonia, so it’s hitting close to home right now especially. But I also know there needs to be a space where it’s okay to recognize mistakes, and work through talking candidly to find better ways of looking at how desire and sexual practice are interconnected.

    • maijaj thinks Why It's So Hard To Talk About... is Win, Trashy & OMG  about 3 months ago
    • cspandolfo thinks Why It's So Hard To Talk About... is Fail & LOL  about 3 months ago
    • wesilly 3 months ago

      Let’s take out barebacking for a moment. The reason why it’s so hard for anyone to talk about behavior like you’re describing is because it’s often hard for human beings to talk about doing something “against our better judgment.” (Your words) When you engage in a behavior, no matter what it is, that is against your better judgment, you feel guilt because you know you engaged in a behavior that either you or someone else has deemed wrong. And shame is the voice in your head that is chiding you for not living up to a certain standard. In some cases, that standard is bullshit. For example, gender norms. The shame we feel from stepping outside of a gender norm is real, but it’s also not necessarily a behavior that is inherently wrong. It’s a behavior that society tells us is wrong. And as we often know, society fucks things up. Willfully engaging in a behavior that increases your risk for contracting a disease and others not mentioned here that have the power to destroy your body is quite literally a self-destructive behavior. I don’t think it’s moralistic (unless you wanna get balls-deep philosophical) to say that protecting one’s self and one’s body against disease is what one ought to do. I get not wanting to tell people how to live their lives - but asking people to be safer to help save and preserve their quality of life is a good thing. It shows compassion, it shows concern for life, and it shows a respect to the ideal that self-destructive behavior can be a really negative thing. I’m sorry that you (and others) feel shame from that kind of concern. I find it stunning and odd. So, yes. It’s difficult to talk about barebacking, or any behavior that highlights potentially self-destructive behavior because it’s an admission on your part that you’re doing something - not wrong - but risky. You didn’t mention any of this in your essay, and talking about why it’s so hard CAN be named in a very real way. PS - You write from a position of extreme privilege - most of which isn’t even acknowledged here. I don’t take issue with your courage to try to start a conversation about this, but to not acknowledge all of the factors that play into your privilege and to not even acknowledge the complexity of trying to have this conversation in, oh say, communities of color or with trans* folks or folks who don’t have access to the studies and tests that you regularly engage in - I think that’s a real fucking travesty.

      • Kyle Bella 3 months ago

        I’ve actually worked a lot with intercity HIV/AIDS advocacy organizations in Philadelphia, working with the Trans Health Conference, a Latino HIV prevention organization, a few organizations focused on campaigns directed toward black MSM, and others. There are resources, studies, free clinicians available for a lot of these populations. City governments, health workers, education programs in schools need to work harder to talk about these programs. Of course I have privileges, but let’s not pretend or diminish the localized HIV prevention work that’s going on. It IS happening, and there are resources and mobilization around this.  As this conversation illustrates, being safer means belitted, called names, and told that people know better than me. Not an effective way to encourage others, especially in these more marginalized populations, to look at changing their behaviors. Something doesn’t fit here.

      • wesilly 3 months ago

        I was not belittling you in the slightest, but I think it’s very telling that you read my comment that way. Your defenses are clearly up. I find it interesting that folks are holding you to a higher standard than you’ve held for yourself perhaps when you initially penned this, and you’re not necessarily willing to engage deeper in those responses. I tried to use my words very carefully so as not to attack you. I didn’t feel like you answered the question you posed as thoughtfully as you could have. There was no real acknowledgment that practicing sex without a condom can be considered self-destructive - and no parallels drawn to other such behaviors. I find that really interesting and a bit problematic. I don’t see that as belittling you or calling you a name.  I did want to check you on the privilege exhibited in this article. As someone with privilege, I find it important. I get that being checked can be hard. But for the record, calling you privileged is not calling you a name. Thanks for acknowledging that you worked with organizations. Doesn’t necessarily prove to me that you have a vast understanding of the consequences your rhetoric could have on those communities. You’re not schooling me and you’re not fooling anyone to ignore the incredible and pervasive barriers to care that these communities face. They don’t all just live in Philly, and they shouldn’t all have to flock to Philly to get relatively easy access to care. If you wanna have a conversation about being sex-positive, as I’ve seen you mention here, then have that conversation. I get the shame thing, as I think I outlined earlier. But there’s a way to have this conversation, be sex positive, be inclusive of communities you don’t belong to, not shame people, and still acknowledge the enormous risk you take when you have sex without a condom.

      • Kyle Bella 3 months ago

        Okay, thank you for this response and for the clarification. I think that if you look at the comments, you’ll see most of them resort to childish name-calling, and make a number of claims which I find to be disingenuous and hateful. I’m glad that’s not the case for you. Having sex without condoms can be self-destructive, but people are so quick to label as people who have sex without condoms as totally clueless. Surely that’s something you can acknowledge and see is pervasive, and damaging to ANY kind of community affected by HIV/AIDS. I certainly wish I had more time to talk about how we can talk about more types of barebacking, but I didn’t have the space to do so. I certainly think barebacking within relationships is barebacking like the first incident I describe, or making a choice to do it in more intentional contexts. This doesn’t mean there isn’t any risk (there is always a big risk), but not every situation is equally. Hopefully in the future I’ll have more of an opportunity to talk about this. Of course there are barriers everywhere, but the burden for these barriers often get placed on victims of poor government social policy or health systems. Of course these policies are in cities all over, was just using Philly as an example of a place where there have been some inroads to barriers in part because there are people are committed to finding a delicate balance between talking about risky behaviors and informing more holistic routines for having pleasurable and risk-reduced sex. I’m glad you’re part of that conversation.

    • BarrettN thinks Why It's So Hard To Talk About... is WTF  about 3 months ago
    • andrewprestona   Why It's So Hard To Talk About... and thinks it’s Powerful  about 3 months ago
    • Ivan Z 3 months ago

      I think that while the psychology of sex can indeed be quite complicated, a lot of it really boils down to a simple concept — pleasure. It has been shown in other species that high/extreme levels of pleasurable outcome will influence behavior that often involves high levels of pain. Take this concept to sex and it is easy to see why “in the moment” one might choose to engage in unsafe/risky behavior to enjoy 2 seconds of orgasm. It is a peculiar conundrum of priorities — health versus pleasure — and the means we choose to achieve either one.

    • ApproximateKnowledge thinks Why It's So Hard To Talk About... is Fail  about 3 months ago
    • zombiebait 3 months ago

      What about contracting other things besides HIV…. Like herpes, chlamydia, or incurable gonorrhea? Trying to change calling “unsafe” sex to barebacking is going to do a lot more harm than you may think. There are a lot of reasons to wear a condom. Also the term “fucking raw” is repulsive.

      • Kyle Bella 3 months ago

        If you want to prevent STIs, use condoms during oral sex. Every time. How many people do think will actually take that advice? Not many. Also, “fucking raw” is a usage that news to be put out there. There’s an industry of “raw” porn, and a lot of people talking about “raw sex.” It’s a colloquialism that I wanted to put out there.

    • BarrettN 3 months ago

      I can’t believe opinion pieces like this are being published as rampantly as they have been in the last few years. It’s a hackneyed position to editorialize, inevitably leveraged with emotion and personal experience to provide some sort of false legitimacy/rationalization against safer sex practices. Where is editorial? Anyway… People shouldn’t feel ashamed for making a mistake. They should feel ashamed for acting like putting themselves -and others, given how many people don’t know they’re positive- at risk for ANY sexually transmitted disease like it’s no big deal, like it’s just something sexually active people have to deal with. Risk is a part of sex. Being recklessly self-deceiving with a chronic and potentially deadly disease? Inexcusable. The writer knows about an artist who died of AIDS and has seen a few movies. Congratulations. That doesn’t mean he has any idea what people went through during the height of the AIDS epidemic in the US. Not to mention, casual attitudes about unsafe sex are what is leading to the resurgence of AIDS and the crisis we’re experiencing now when so many young gay people can’t afford healthcare and by default the medication to live healthy lives with the disease. It is so unbelievable obnoxious to hear HIV negative people repeatedly undermine the importance of safer sex practices because their health has not been affected by the disease. It should also be noted how it undermines the experiences of people who have and do struggle with HIV today when these individuals can’t speak to that actual experience of having HIV in any capacity by virtue of not being a part of the HIV positive population.

    • arnauda thinks Why It's So Hard To Talk About... is Cute  about 3 months ago
    • Penny 3 months ago

      yikes. kyle. i feel for you, sweetheart. i have a background in community engagement and opening a dialogue for a sticky subject is tough. your comments following are nearly all trying to get across what your article just didn’t. this is an interesting discussion, might i encourage you to try again? finding the right questions to crack into fertile conversation is the goal and, truly, this article is filled with highly rhetorical questions with already defensively positioned answers that, instead of demonstrate the failings of our pleasurewant, justify its id driven, toddler-esque immediate wants and asks the audience to pat it on the head. /no one/ is sympathetically reading your coke bathroom bareback tryst. re-frame it. nobody can hear you.

      • Kyle Bella 3 months ago

        Actually, they are. I’ve gotten other comments that have been positive, including from those who work in healthcare and those who are HIV positive. So clearly some people are getting it, maybe not right here on the BuzzFeed main page, but that’s because these forums are designed to spread negative comments. How might you suggest reframing this discussion, since it seems like you have all of the answers. Because you basically just called me a toddler who doesn’t really know how to write well. Is that a good way to get a conversation going?

    • liesmith 3 months ago

      The issue here is not sex or sexuality, it’s willful stupidity — doing something you know is dangerous but doing it anyway because it feels good. This is called being human. It’s one of the main reasons why STDs are still spreading, why people still take up smoking, and why obesity is such a problem.  You had bareback sex even though you knew the risks, you don’t want to feel ashamed about it, and you wish there were some way besides condoms to reduce the risks because you’re going to do it again since it feels great. Guess what? I wish I could eat donuts every day and not gain weight because I’m sure as hell never giving up donuts because they taste great. And if that can’t happen, then I at least wish there were no shame in being fat. Who doesn’t want some version of that, whether it be about food, sex, alcohol, drugs, etc.? What is there to discuss about that? All you’ve really done is have a personal epiphany about how messed up human nature is. You’ve couched your discovery in an attention-grabbing way, but there’s really no novel dialogue to be had here.

    • MBG1217 3 months ago

      We don’t need a “dialogue” on this issue. Unsafe and irresponsible behavior is unsafe and irresponsible. This article should never have been published. 1 in 5 gay men in the US have HIV, according to the CDC, and Buzzfeed is normalizing unsafe sex. It boggles the mind.

      • Kyle Bella 3 months ago

        Because IT IS normal. IT IS common. And we’re spouting off all of these statistics, but not actually asking people the situations they choose not to use condoms in and why. To me, that is what is reckless.

      • MBG1217 3 months ago

        You know what was normal and common, among gay men, in my lifetime? Death from AIDS. But some people decided that, hey, let’s try to make that NOT normal and common among gay men. Let’s try to stop this from being so normal and common. And one of the ways they tried to stop it was by telling people to NOT have unsafe sex. If getting behind the wheel of a car when your blood alcohol level is .25 was “common,” that wouldn’t make it OK. It doesn’t matter how many people are doing something — that doesn’t make it acceptable. Risking other people’s lives — which is what unsafe sex IS, by definition — is NEVER acceptable. Period. We don’t “ask” people why they “decided” to drive drunk. We lock them up.  The disaster that is HIV prevention — again, 1 in 5 gay men are HIV positive — does not suggest that we should glamorize unsafe sex and try to be EVEN MORE understanding of people who make bad choices. When you destigmatize something you get more of it. People like you, who want to bring back the communal-sewer sex culture of the 1970s and early 1980s and justify yourself with “I like it, it feels good,” why should the rest of us pay for your health care? Seriously — if you want to commit suicide, why should I be on the hook, which I am because of the Ryan White Care Act, for your HIV meds for the rest of your life? Ryan White got infected with HIV through a blood transfusion, but people like you make deliberate choices, apparently feeling entitled to do whatever you what, to risk this disease. This study that you’re a part of, it’s being paid for with tax dollars. Why is society obligated to save your life, if you yourself are willing to risk it?  I don’t give a flip why you chose to have unsafe sex, or why any other people do, any more than I care about the reasons a drunk driver got drunk before he got behind the wheel of a car. Your self-serving, shortsighted, entitled desire to risk not just your own health but the health of other people you have sex with is contemptible and, again, the editors of BuzzFeed have blood on their hands for publishing this piece.

      • kat 518 3 months ago

        Lots of behaviors are normal and common. Smoking used to be normal and common. Now it’s not because people realized how risky it is.

    • Yeah, a lot of gay men don’t use condoms consistently because they are in long-term committed, exclusive relationships with guys they love and trust, not because they are fucking French cokeheads they just met. Please don’t paint all of us with your wide brushstrokes.

    • andrewprestona 3 months ago

      By the way, I commend you for your honesty and willingness to spark up this conversation. I also thank you for your participation in the HIV clinic. Hopefully, with your help, one Fay soon the findings can help those who haven’t been as lucky as you or me.

    • andrewprestona 3 months ago

      Kyle, I totally understand. I’ve barebacked more often than not and I’m not really ashamed of that fact. What I am slightly ashamed of, however, is how reckless I occasionally was by not insisting my partner have proof of a recent negative diagnosis. I am now with my partner of two and a half years and we do practice barebacking. We are both completely committed and have never contracted any form of STD. I believe there is a safe way to practice “unsafe” sex. It just requires more effort than rolling a piece of latex over your soldier. If I could change anything about my sexual past, it wouldn’t be my practice of barebacking; it would be the number of partners with which I engaged in risky business.

      • Kyle Bella 3 months ago

        Thanks, Andrew! I do hope that others take the time to consider the risk of their behaviors. I certainly have, and have taken a lot of efforts to make sure I’m being a lot more thoughtful about things. People are imperfect, but I’m taking the time to be more intentional and open with myself and my partners. I do hope more people can feel comfortable to do the same.

    • joef18   Why It's So Hard To Talk About... and thinks it’s Win  about 3 months ago
    • kathrynp 3 months ago

      Being committed to remaining negative yet engaging in what you know is a very high risk activity seems a great contradiction. I sincerely hope your luck holds out. I have a friend who wasn’t so lucky on that one occasion and I wouldn’t wish the daily agony he suffers on anyone.

    • Robbie4268   Why It's So Hard To Talk About...  about 3 months ago
    • Lucas Witherspoon   Why It's So Hard To Talk About...  about 3 months ago
    • andrewjonathans2   Why It's So Hard To Talk About...  about 3 months ago
    • gilliamjf thinks Why It's So Hard To Talk About... is Powerful  about 3 months ago
    • snapfreeze 3 months ago

      This article made me way too angry to formulate a coherent response.
      You, dear author, is the perfect example of what is so horribly wrong with the gay community and why STIs are so rampant. You DO realise that 1 in 20 gay men are hiv+ (in metropolitan areas) you even admit knowing the risks. You talk about how those 10 minutes at the clinic were the longest minutes of your life, and yet you’d be willing to do it again. I’m sorry, but you are an idiot. A very dangerous one, too.
      It is called “unsafe” for a very good reason - you have quite a high chance of contracting crippling diseases, some uncurable, that could potentially ruin your life forever. Well done. But then again, if I hooked up with someone and saw him doing coke in the bathroom I’d GTFO as fast as I can… To each his own.

      • Kyle Bella 3 months ago

        STIs are rampant because they’re spread through oral sex, and nobody in their right mind is going to use a condom while having oral sex, unless they’re paranoid. This is how the *much more common* STIs are spread. As far as the first example, it’s illustrative of one particularly extreme situation, and not a representation of my behavior all of the time. Thanks for calling me an idiot, really makes me want to engage in any substantial conversation with you.

    • Shawn W. 3 months ago

      Is there that much of a difference between Unprotected/Unsafe sex in the LGBT world Vs. Straight? The risks are there in any one night stand, more-so when you see that someone doing dangerous drugs. That style of drug use shows that that person is already willing to gamble with their life. The term unsafe sex, is solid, there is no hidden meaning in that term. Russian Roulette is an unsafe recreational activity. You’re betting big, and in the same way that bullet ends your life, HIV changes your life as you know it. It *IS* a big deal. Even if the vaccine pans out, and you can “for sure” protect yourself from HIV… there’s still that plethora of STIs out there and some that don’t go away with a simple treatment. To even say you *might* do it again, as a conscious decision… is foolish. That’s on you, though. I feel like this post could be edited down to “Unsafe sex is bad, whether you’re gay or straight. Also, some people make really bad life choices, and intend to repeat them.”

    • Ooopieceacandy 3 months ago

      I’m not a gay man so I couldn’t respond with a personal experience about barebacking. But this type of behavior seems highly immature and irresponsible. The “it feels better without a condom” is such a bullshit “thing” these days it’s sickening..and it’s not just folks like the author, it’s young girls getting pregnant and contracting STD’s because they have unprotected sex with a guy who insists condoms “take away the feeling”  I have friends and family who are living with the disease, some have a better quality of life than others, but still they are living with an incurable disease because they made the decision to let their hormones and the heat of the moment think for them. This disease is the #1 epidemic in the world right now and you’re worried about “sexual freedom” or whatever nonsense you’re blithering on about.
      If the person isn’t your regular partner or at least a regular partner on a short list, why in your right mind would you put yourself at risk of contracting HIV in exchange for a cocaine fueled fuck in a hotel room with a stranger?…….?? When you’re about 30 or 35 or so and ready to settle down with a guy that’s totally OVER anonymous sex with weirdos he doesn’t know, I’m sure the two of you will want to have unprotected sex because you’re partners…..so why not until then oh I dunno…USE A FREAKING CONDOM *_* Not sure if you’ve ever watched any documentaries or talked to any older gay men who lived through the crisis and were out on the scene at the time but the phrase “all my friends were dying” seems to be a recurring theme, meaning that getting HIV was once an automatic death sentence and there was no “living with it.” So maybe you should be more appreciative of the times you live in and the part of the world you live in that you are even able to think about “well what if I had to live with HIV because of the decision I made last night…” Because for the men who lived a generation or two before you, and for people who live in poorer parts of the world that can’t afford the medicine required to live with the disease, they didn’t and don’t have the luxury of weighing the risk of having unsafe sex right now, or living with an incurable disease for the rest of their lives….

    • Nuns Having Fun   Why It's So Hard To Talk About...  about 3 months ago
    • mattm58 thinks Why It's So Hard To Talk About... is Fail  about 3 months ago
    • alekt   Why It's So Hard To Talk About...  about 3 months ago
    • Nuns Having Fun 3 months ago

      I think it’s interesting, the criticism that you’re receiving. I, too, have engaged in bareback sex, and had the exact same feelings of shame from enjoying it despite all the knowledge of the disease. It’s awesome that someone is starting this dialogue because it does address current attitudes I have seen and have within the community.

      • Kyle Bella 3 months ago

        It’s interesting! You’re the first on here that has expressed this opinion (though some have messaged me privately who I already talk to on the internet). I guess it’s funny because I’m not advocating for any kind of behavior, or trying to justify my actions. I just want to open up a dialogue to talk about why behavior/actions can be so differently, and find ways to create spaces where as many people as possible feel comfortable to talk about sex and find the safest ways to do it. Somehow things got misconstrued, I guess opening up that dialogue is a lot harder than expected. Thanks for sharing!

    • whattupjoe 3 months ago

      this is so contradictory. you talk about recognizing the risks associated with barebacking and that you’re committed to staying HIV negative and such, and then you say that you’ll probably do it again and that your intention to do so is driven by your irrational desires. why should we listen to you, let alone trust your judgement?  i think maybe you just don’t like being told by someone other than yourself that you’re an irresponsible or unsafe person. to be fair, irresponsible/unsafe actions don’t mean that one is irresponsible/unsafe overall.  also, maybe not all bareback encounters are totally unsafe. but seriously, you watched a total stranger do coke in a hotel bathroom and then had sex with him. you certainly made a judgement call there. (and you can say i’m prejudice toward drug users if you want, but i too have my reasons.) regardless, with HIV/AIDS still a threat today- albeit much less so than before- what you did constitutes unsafe, irresponsible behavior. saying that you recognize it was ‘risky’ instead of using harsher language doesn’t make it any better.  you’ve basically laid out what is the likely truth: that gay men have bareback sex because they want to and because it feels good. end of story.  just remember that it’s not only about you GETTING the disease; bareback sex could also mean GIVING the disease to someone else. do you want to be that person? if you and other people decide to go forth with common sexual practices that are associated with greater risk of HIV infection, then so fucking be it. i just hope you have the common sense to stop when and if you do contract HIV. and also remember that a lot of people died to bring you to a point where you feel secure in barebacking. (PS I am gay, male, 21, US.) TL;DR i think ur ignorant/immature blah blah rah rah plz don’t have sex with me

    • Khristafer thinks Why It's So Hard To Talk About... is Ew, Fail & Trashy  about 3 months ago
    • Michael Broder 3 months ago

      I have two words to say about this: pre-exposure prophylaxis.

      • Kyle Bella 3 months ago

        I know about PrEP. It’s part of the education program in the HIV vaccine trial. I have pretty mixed feelings, since the cost in most places is so high, and the study data are not as promising as I’d like them to be. Still, I have access to it in SF under the city’s Health SF plan, so it’s something that I’ve considered. Thanks for mentioning this potential option.

    • nancym25   Why It's So Hard To Talk About... and thinks it’s Trashy & Fail  about 3 months ago
    • alekt 3 months ago

      Admitting that you will likely have unsafe sex again in the future certainly doesn’t make you “committed to staying HIV negative”. It means that you are willing to engage in behaviour which may not only infect you with an incurable virus, but which may lead to you infecting others who may be less informed. I say this because you admit to getting tested only weeks later, ignoring that the antibodies which would indicate an HIV infection could take three to six months to develop after infection, and you’re either unaware of this or don’t care. Either way, it’s appalling to object to the term “unsafe sex” on high-minded intellectual or moral grounds, because that’s what it is. It’s unsafe. Its increasing popularity increases the infection rates of both curable and incurable diseases which will infrequently kill. It’s fucking irresponsible. If you don’t want to be judged, then realize that judgment is justified when your choices are such that they affect not only you, but others. You’re a fucking adult, and you deserve that judgment.

      • Michael Broder 3 months ago

        Each and every man can choose condoms for himself. So why is Kyle irresponsible? How is he putting other people at risk unless those people are putting themselves at risk?

      • Kyle Bella 3 months ago

        I am committed to staying HIV negative. I’m part of an HIV vaccine trial that’s working to help find a cure for everyone with HIV. I keep informed on the developments in terms of medical advances, political shifts, and am aware of a history that means a great deal to my own studies. As part of my HIV vaccine trial, I get a viral RNA blood test every 3 months, as required by the study, to detect for the presence of HIV in my blood. This works within 9 days after every concern of exposure, though my decision to decide when or use a condom or not is now, since that incident, very careful. I use the term “risk” because I work with a lot of clinicians and other health practitioners who favor that term because it shapes the conversation/dialogue better on how to change behaviors. I am imperfect. I make mistakes, but I try to learn from them so that in the future any risk I have from sex is reduced as much as possible. Sometimes that isn’t the case, but this incident I use above has forced me to think about the responsibility of my actions, no matter what you might say or think. I’m open about my sexual practices, my testing history, my status, so there’s nobody who will not have access to that information if they are willing to ask. Don’t make me seems stupid, reckless, or anything similar. It surely isn’t going to help me wanting to engage in a dialogue, and it’s going to do nothing to stop spread of HIV.

    • bent24 thinks Why It's So Hard To Talk About... is Powerful  about 3 months ago
    • milwaukeedude20   Why It's So Hard To Talk About... and thinks it’s Fail  about 3 months ago
    • Mephistolfleas 3 months ago

      By calling unprotected sex by a fun-sounding other name (barebacking), you’re casting a shadow on the actual consequences that follow that behavior. It’s called “unsafe sex” because it is, not because anyone is trying to shame sexuality.  It is unsafe to have casual sex with random people if you don’t use protection. That’s just how it is. It’s not fun, or happy, or conducive to pleasure-seeking behavior, but it’s reality. Shame always comes about as a response to societal judgement, but the judgement society places on this type of behavior is not a condemnation of sexuality, but a response willful ignorance of sexual consequences.