I never said I justified their cause. I simply said their goals were clear and made public from the beginning. Doesn’t matter what they wanted to cut, they wanted less spending under the premise of financial responsibility… no more 1 trillion dollar failed stimulus packages, bailouts (which you mentioned by the way) and whatnot. here. They gave their goals right away. On the other hand, OWS still is disorganized and can’t answer basic questions. Sure, you might be able to… but the people on the street… no.
Please validate your account to contribute content.
Preview Your Response
“Doesn’t matter what they wanted to cut, they wanted less spending under the [guise] of financial responsibility…”
Fixed. You’re a moron if you think it doesn’t matter how they want to achieve “fiscal responsibility”. It’s like saying that North Korea is making it clear they WANT to be a Democratic Republic since it’s in their name and all, they just go about it in an authoritarian and “wacky” way.
I mentioned a specific aspect of the Stimulus package. As an econ major I’ve been arguing since the beginning that the 790 billion dollar package wasn’t enough and wasn’t spent correctly. Over one third of the package was wasted on Tax cuts which simply do not stimulate anything other than conservative penises(but only when republicans do them!). I’ll flat out agree with you the stimulus was largely(key word) wasted.
And again, OWS has already released a set of demands/grievances. Your argument is invalid on it’s face. And you could pick out morons out of any crowd. I’m more surprised you had to look all the way to Sacramento to find some. That being said, lets watch the tea party members try to explain their problems with the Obama Admin:
http://youtu.be/oHItY5Anj3s http://youtu.be/lUPMjC9mq5Y http://youtu.be/zbyFeFhUTmI