So… if he was speaking to an all male group and said “I am convinced that the men of this generation— all of you— will lead the way”… that would go over well right?

Most of these are sound bites taken out of context. Much like most campaign material like this on either side.

Sorry but the 40-0 record isn't as impressive as many are trying to say. The fact is women's college basketball is far more top heavy than almost any other sport in terms of what schools are represented. Only 14 schools have ever won a championship, and UConn and Tennessee have 15 championships between them. That is HALF of the championships.

Pointing out the sports gap doesn't really work, because quite frankly the 50th most famous male basketball players is probably still more well known internationally than the MOST famous female basketball player. So finding an editor who's “into women's sports” isn't exactly a solution.

It's interesting that this chart compares men and women at age 25. I'm curious if the chart looks different for age 40? Or 60?

You're assuming my stance on a number of issues. I never justified any of the points you're discussing. All I was doing was looking at Christ and his stance on this point. I never said he'd support that other stuff either did I? Being a conservative is broader than that, just like being a liberal mean you believe in EVERYTHING the democratic party does right?

No, what I'm suggesting is that it's contradictory to say that charging women more for health insurance is discriminatory while charging men more for car insurance isn't. Regardless of reason, it's still charging one group more purely because of gender right?

Generally the healthcare stats people quote exclude pregnancy and childbirth costs.

Look, I can understand celebrating that these dogs can continue living with these devices… but how in the world is it brave of them? It's not really a good descriptor…

If charging women more for health insurance is discrimination then charging men more for car insurance is discrimination.