<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
>

<channel>
<title>BuzzFeed  - Jake Levy</title>
<link>http://buzzfeed.com/jakel11</link>
<description>BuzzFeed, Find Your New Favorite Thing</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 BuzzFeed, Inc.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:37:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
<managingEditor>editor@buzzfeed.com (http://www.buzzfeed.com/about)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>info@buzzfeed.com (http://www.buzzfeed.com/about)</webMaster>
<atom:link href="http://buzzfeed.com/jakel11.xml" rel="self" />
<atom:link href="http://buzzfeed.superfeedr.com/" rel="hub" />


<item>
<title>Testing The Conventional Wisdom On NBA Overtime</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/testing-the-conventional-wisdom-on-nba-overtime</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>A statistical analysis.</p>




 <p>A few assumptions are often tossed around about overtime: first, that the home team has an advantage; and second, that teams carry over fourth quarter momentum into extra time. We looked at both, breaking down how often the home and away teams won in a variety of scenarios.</p>











 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/5/15/12/enhanced-buzz-9573-1368636481-0.jpg" width="625" height="676" alt="" /></p>
 
	<p>The data used in the analysis comes from <a href="http://sportsdatabase.com/">SportsDataBase.com</a> and covers all games from the 2002-03 season up to the beginning of the 2013 playoffs (a total of 754 overtime games).</p><p>The graphic above displays historic results for both home and away teams under nine different overtime scenarios. The vertical columns tell you which team had the better record going into the game &mdash; the "tie" column means they had the same record coming in. The horizontal rows list which team was winning the game going into the fourth quarter of regulation. </p><p>The two bars in the upper left corner of the chart, for example, are the results of games in which the home team had a better record than the visitor and led the game at the start of the fourth quarter. (In other words, the away team staged a comeback to force overtime.)</p><p>A few general results of the analysis:</p>











 
 
 
	<h1>Away teams who&#39;d blown a lead did better than away teams who&#39;d made a comeback.</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/5/15/15/enhanced-buzz-8516-1368644533-12.jpg" width="625" height="664" alt="Away teams who&amp;#39;d blown a lead did better than away teams who&amp;#39;d made a comeback." /></p>
 
	<p>Specifically, away teams that came into the game with a better record than their opponents won more overtimes after LOSING a fourth quarter lead than they did after making a fourth quarter comeback, suggesting that momentum isn&#39;t all it&#39;s cracked up to be. (Away teams that had <i>worse</i> records than their opponents did about the same in overtime whether or not they&#39;d lost a lead.)</p>











 
 
 
	<h1>Overall, home teams won <i>fewer</i> overtime games than they did games as a whole.</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/5/15/14/enhanced-buzz-26030-1368643800-17.jpg" width="625" height="246" alt="Overall, home teams won fewer overtime games than they did games as a whole." /></p>
 
	<p>Home teams won 61% of ALL games in the time period studied but only 54% of those that went to OT, which means our results might suggest that home-court advantage isn&#39;t as important in the extra period as conventional wisdom would have it. (Of course, visiting teams that force overtime are probably better on the whole than the general pool of all visiting teams.)</p>






<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/testing-the-conventional-wisdom-on-nba-overtime">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/testing-the-conventional-wisdom-on-nba-overtime</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:57:36 -0400</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;A statistical analysis.&#x3C;/b&#x3E;</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">jakel11</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr03/2013/5/17/16/testing-the-conventional-wisdom-on-nba-overtime-1-32396-1368824255-9.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content isDefault="true">
    <media:description type="html">A few assumptions are often tossed around about overtime: first, that the home team has an advantage; and second, that teams carry over fourth quarter momentum into extra time. We looked at both, breaking down how often the home and away teams won in a variety of scenarios.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="676" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/5/15/12/enhanced-buzz-9573-1368636481-0.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">The data used in the analysis comes from &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://sportsdatabase.com/&#x22;&#x3E;SportsDataBase.com&#x3C;/a&#x3E; and covers all games from the 2002-03 season up to the beginning of the 2013 playoffs (a total of 754 overtime games).

The graphic above displays historic results for both home and away teams under nine different overtime scenarios. The vertical columns tell you which team had the better record going into the game &#x26;mdash; the &#x22;tie&#x22; column means they had the same record coming in. The horizontal rows list which team was winning the game going into the fourth quarter of regulation. 

The two bars in the upper left corner of the chart, for example, are the results of games in which the home team had a better record than the visitor and led the game at the start of the fourth quarter. (In other words, the away team staged a comeback to force overtime.)

A few general results of the analysis:</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="664" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/5/15/15/enhanced-buzz-8516-1368644533-12.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">Specifically, away teams that came into the game with a better record than their opponents won more overtimes after LOSING a fourth quarter lead than they did after making a fourth quarter comeback, suggesting that momentum isn&#x26;#39;t all it&#x26;#39;s cracked up to be. (Away teams that had &#x3C;i&#x3E;worse&#x3C;/i&#x3E; records than their opponents did about the same in overtime whether or not they&#x26;#39;d lost a lead.)</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="246" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/5/15/14/enhanced-buzz-26030-1368643800-17.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">Home teams won 61% of ALL games in the time period studied but only 54% of those that went to OT, which means our results might suggest that home-court advantage isn&#x26;#39;t as important in the extra period as conventional wisdom would have it. (Of course, visiting teams that force overtime are probably better on the whole than the general pool of all visiting teams.)</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="411" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr05/2013/5/15/14/enhanced-buzz-17471-1368644042-12.jpg" width="621">
    <media:description type="html">Makes sense. They were the better team.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
<item>
<title>The BuzzFeed Brain/Heart Matrix</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/the-buzzfeed-brainheart-index</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>Find out which stories blew up on Twitter (the brain of the internet) and Facebook (the heart).</p>




 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/5/13/10/enhanced-buzz-25036-1368456058-14.jpg" width="625" height="729" alt="" /></p>
 
	


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="Design by John Gara for BuzzFeed" class="">Design by John Gara for BuzzFeed</a></small></p>









 <p>If Twitter is the brain of the social web &mdash; lots of chatter, commentary, and argument &mdash; then Facebook is the heart &mdash; a place for liking, sharing, and emotions. BuzzFeed analyzed a selection of top posts from the past week to find out what percent of their traffic came from Twitter and what percent came from Facebook. Above, our Brain/Heart Matrix for May 1 through May 7.</p>











 <p>These got the highest percentage of traffic from Twitter of the stories we looked at:</p>











 
 
 
	<h1>5. <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/natashavc/deep-inside-the-biggest-little-dildo-factory-in-america">"Deep Inside The Biggest Little Dildo Factory In America"</a></h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/5/10/11/enhanced-buzz-18340-1368198345-0.jpg" width="625" height="417" alt="5. &quot;Deep Inside The Biggest Little Dildo Factory In America&quot;" /></p>
 
	<p>This BuzzReads story got 11.14% of its traffic from Twitter.</p>


 <p><small>Via: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/natashavc/deep-inside-the-biggest-little-dildo-factory-in-america" class="">natashavc</a></small></p>




<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/the-buzzfeed-brainheart-index">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/the-buzzfeed-brainheart-index</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 11:06:35 -0400</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;Find out which stories blew up on Twitter (the brain of the internet) and Facebook (the heart).&#x3C;/b&#x3E;</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">annanorth</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr02/2013/5/13/11/the-buzzfeed-brainheart-matrix-1-25036-1368457746-26.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content height="729" isDefault="true" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/5/13/10/enhanced-buzz-25036-1368456058-14.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">If Twitter is the brain of the social web &#x26;mdash; lots of chatter, commentary, and argument &#x26;mdash; then Facebook is the heart &#x26;mdash; a place for liking, sharing, and emotions. BuzzFeed analyzed a selection of top posts from the past week to find out what percent of their traffic came from Twitter and what percent came from Facebook. Above, our Brain/Heart Matrix for May 1 through May 7.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">These got the highest percentage of traffic from Twitter of the stories we looked at:</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="417" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/5/10/11/enhanced-buzz-18340-1368198345-0.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">This BuzzReads story got 11.14% of its traffic from Twitter.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="417" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/5/10/11/enhanced-buzz-18339-1368198214-8.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">11.28% of this Politics story&#x26;#39;s traffic came through Twitter.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="419" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/5/10/10/enhanced-buzz-17221-1368197925-5.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">Another BuzzReads story; this one got 16.67% of its traffic from Twitter.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="437" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/5/10/10/enhanced-buzz-17741-1368197549-0.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">This BuzzFeed Music piece got 23.33% of its traffic from Twitter.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="376" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/5/10/10/enhanced-buzz-13839-1368196174-4.jpg" width="558">
    <media:description type="html">26.25% of this BuzzFeed Sports story&#x26;#39;s traffic came from Twitter.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">These stories got the highest percentage of their traffic from Facebook:</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="393" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/5/10/11/enhanced-buzz-17745-1368198927-7.jpg" width="596">
    <media:description type="html">This BuzzFeed Animals story got just over half &#x26;mdash; 51.78% &#x26;mdash; of its traffic from Facebook.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="240" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/5/10/11/anigif_enhanced-buzz-26996-1368198849-6.gif" width="426">
    <media:description type="html">This Fashion post got 54.38% of its traffic from Facebook.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="452" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/5/10/11/enhanced-buzz-2250-1368198745-2.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">56.62% of this BuzzFeed UK story&#x26;#39;s views came from Facebook.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="264" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/5/10/11/anigif_enhanced-buzz-25238-1368198590-3.gif" width="340">
    <media:description type="html">Terrible handshakes are popular on Facebook &#x26;mdash; 57.64% of this story&#x26;#39;s traffic came from the social network.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="416" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/5/10/11/enhanced-buzz-17658-1368198492-6.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">This story got the highest percentage of Facebook traffic of all &#x26;mdash; a full 71.01% of its over a million views came through Facebook.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
<item>
<title>How To Get Fat Without Spending Any Money</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/arunmikkilineni/how-to-get-fat-without-spending-any-money</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>Find out which foods pack the most calories per dollar. Hint: They&#8217;re not always what you&#8217;d think.</p>




 
 
 
	<h1>Arby&#39;s Large Roast Beef: 85 Calories Per Dollar</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/4/25/14/enhanced-buzz-7069-1366913853-0.jpg" width="625" height="469" alt="Arby&amp;#39;s Large Roast Beef: 85 Calories Per Dollar" /></p>
 
	<p>The large roast beef will set you back $6.60 and packs in 560 calories. A decent choice for cheap weight gain, but you can do better!</p>


 <p><small>Via: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://ohmydazeblondie.tumblr.com/post/40764305729/http-whrt-it-usncgl" class="has_icon icon_tumblr">ohmydazeblondie.tumblr.com</a></small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>Taco Bell Doritos Locos Taco: 100 Calories Per Dollar</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/4/24/16/enhanced-buzz-1986-1366834147-18.jpg" width="518" height="465" alt="Taco Bell Doritos Locos Taco: 100 Calories Per Dollar" /></p>
 
	<p>The Doritos Locos Taco quickly became one of the most popular items on Taco Bell&#39;s menu. It costs $1.99 and contains about 200 calories. Now available in Cool Ranch too!</p>


 <p><small>Via: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://fast-food-nutrition.findthebest.com/l/3184/Taco-Bell-Doritos-Locos-Tacos" class="">fast-food-nutrition.findthebest.com</a></small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>KFC Double Down: 106 Calories Per Dollar</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/4/24/16/enhanced-buzz-1914-1366834663-19.jpg" width="625" height="417" alt="KFC Double Down: 106 Calories Per Dollar" /></p>
 
	<p>The infamous Double Down will cost you $5.65 and give you 600 calories. Not bad, but not <i>amazing</i> given what this thing looks like.</p>


 <p><small>Via: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KFC_Double_Down_%22Sandwich%22.jpg" class="">commons.wikimedia.org</a></small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>Shake Shack Double Shackburger: 108 Calories Per Dollar</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/25/12/enhanced-buzz-7257-1366906859-1.jpg" width="625" height="469" alt="Shake Shack Double Shackburger: 108 Calories Per Dollar" /></p>
 
	<p>This burger costs about $7.10 and contains 770 calories, but we know you&#39;ll probably burn most of that off standing in line.</p>


 <p><small>Via: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tasty-eating.blogspot.com/2011/01/shake-shack-again.html" class="">tasty-eating.blogspot.com</a></small></p>




<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/arunmikkilineni/how-to-get-fat-without-spending-any-money">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/arunmikkilineni/how-to-get-fat-without-spending-any-money</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:46:26 -0400</pubDate>
<media:content isDefault="true">
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;Find out which foods pack the most calories per dollar.&#x3C;/b&#x3E; Hint: They&#x26;#39;re not always what you&#x26;#39;d think.</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">arunmikkilineni</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr02/2013/4/25/23/how-to-get-fat-without-spending-any-money-1-20316-1366946436-13.jpg" width="125" />
</media:content>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Definitive Beer And Baseball Index</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/the-definitive-beer-and-baseball-index</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>The ideal stadium experience: an affordable ticket, cheap brews, and a win for the home team. We analyzed beer prices, projected win percentages, and ticket costs to find out which club gives you the best basebang for your ballbuck.</p>




 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/24/12/enhanced-buzz-29956-1366819297-5.jpg" width="625" height="605" alt="" /></p>
 
	











 <p>Above: the projected winning percentage of Major League Baseball teams this season, per <a href="http://www.baseballprospectus.com/odds/">Baseball Prospectus</a>, compared to the <a href="http://brookstonbeerbulletin.com/mlb-stadium-beer-price-report/">price of beer at their stadiums</a> courtesy of the Brookston Beer Bulletin. Below, winning percentage compared to average ticket price as measured by the <a href="http://www.fancostexperience.com">Fan Cost Experience</a> site.</p>











 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/24/12/enhanced-buzz-30014-1366819312-1.jpg" width="625" height="691" alt="" /></p>
 
	











 <p><h1>And, factoring in the cheapness of beer, the price of tickets, and the likelihood of seeing a home win all together, here are BuzzFeed's Beer And Baseball Top Ten:</h1></p>






<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/the-definitive-beer-and-baseball-index">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/the-definitive-beer-and-baseball-index</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:30:02 -0400</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;The ideal stadium experience: an affordable ticket, cheap brews, and a win for the home team.&#x3C;/b&#x3E; We analyzed beer prices, projected win percentages, and ticket costs to find out which club gives you the best basebang for your ballbuck.</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">annanorth</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr02/2013/4/25/10/the-definitive-beer-and-baseball-index-1-18438-1366899196-4.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content height="605" isDefault="true" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/24/12/enhanced-buzz-29956-1366819297-5.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">Above: the projected winning percentage of Major League Baseball teams this season, per &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.baseballprospectus.com/odds/&#x22;&#x3E;Baseball Prospectus&#x3C;/a&#x3E;, compared to the &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://brookstonbeerbulletin.com/mlb-stadium-beer-price-report/&#x22;&#x3E;price of beer at their stadiums&#x3C;/a&#x3E; courtesy of the Brookston Beer Bulletin. Below, winning percentage compared to average ticket price as measured by the &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.fancostexperience.com&#x22;&#x3E;Fan Cost Experience&#x3C;/a&#x3E; site.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="691" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/24/12/enhanced-buzz-30014-1366819312-1.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">&#x3C;h1&#x3E;And, factoring in the cheapness of beer, the price of tickets, and the likelihood of seeing a home win all together, here are BuzzFeed&#x27;s Beer And Baseball Top Ten:&#x3C;/h1&#x3E;</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="396" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/4/24/13/enhanced-buzz-13523-1366824321-10.jpg" width="594">
    <media:description type="html">The &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.wtsp.com/rss/article/254699/4/Atlanta-Barves-t-shirts-go-on-sale-yes-Barves&#x22;&#x3E;Braves&#x3C;/a&#x3E; combine cheap tickets and a solid expected winning percentage to make up for the fact that their beer isn&#x26;#39;t necessarily the cheapest around. A good choice if you&#x26;#39;re on a beer diet. (Bring a flask, it&#x26;#39;s the south.)</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="412" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr05/2013/4/24/13/enhanced-buzz-9321-1366824487-20.jpg" width="594">
    <media:description type="html">The Reds are another team whose beer could be cheaper, but their projected wins and cheap ticket prices make them a good pick if you don&#x26;#39;t want to pay a lot to see your team dominate.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="393" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/4/24/13/enhanced-buzz-13529-1366822943-14.jpg" width="594">
    <media:description type="html">The Tigers should be one of the two or three winningest MLB teams this season, and their ticket prices aren&#x26;#39;t bad either. And for an about-league-average price, find yourself a &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://bellsbeer.com/&#x22;&#x3E;Bell&#x26;#39;s&#x3C;/a&#x3E;.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="401" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/4/24/12/enhanced-buzz-13476-1366822768-4.jpg" width="594">
    <media:description type="html">The A&#x26;#39;s have a halfway-decent team, cheap beer and cheap tickets as well as some good diehard fans.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="424" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/4/24/13/enhanced-buzz-13475-1366823280-6.jpg" width="594">
    <media:description type="html">A good deal especially when it comes to tickets. Also, Andrew McCutchen&#x26;#39;s infectious smile counts for at least five wins.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="385" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr05/2013/4/24/13/enhanced-buzz-9288-1366823449-11.jpg" width="594">
    <media:description type="html">Lots of wins and cheap tickets at Rangers Ballpark. Beer&#x26;#39;s a little pricey, but the fan above looks to have gotten over that problem.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="487" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr05/2013/4/24/10/enhanced-buzz-32512-1366813109-20.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">A good all-around pick: cheap beer, cheap tickets, decent win projection. The Rays will show you a good time.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="615" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr05/2013/4/24/10/enhanced-buzz-32535-1366813241-21.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">The Angels have some of the best beer prices around. Couple that with a very good team and you have 81 reasons a year to party at Angel Stadium.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="466" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr05/2013/4/24/10/enhanced-buzz-32621-1366813413-21.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">The Dodgers have a World Series-contending team and very cheap tickets &#x26;mdash; way less expensive than their peers in other major cities.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="404" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr05/2013/4/24/13/enhanced-buzz-9320-1366824063-19.jpg" width="594">
    <media:description type="html">The Diamondbacks have the cheapest beer in our data set. They also have great ticket prices and a solid win projection. For a bargain and a great time, you&#x26;#39;d be advised to &#x22;get bitten&#x22; at Chase Field. Catch some Diamondbacks fever! And please call pest control if you see an actual diamondback.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
<item>
<title>Harsher Laws Don&#x27;t Mean Fewer Sex Crimes</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/harsher-laws-dont-mean-fewer-sex-crimes</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>The states with the most severe punishments for rape also have the highest rates of the crime. A BuzzFeed original analysis.</p>




 <p>After the conviction of the Steubenville rapists and the suicide of Rehtaeh Parsons after her alleged rape, it's natural to look for a way to keep crimes like these from happening to anyone else. But disturbingly, making the punishments harsher does not seem to be the answer. </p><p>We looked at the <a href="http://www.arte-sana.com/articles/rape_statutes.pdf">punishments</a> that each state doles out in response to forcible rape. The FBI <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/24/us/definition-of-rape-is-shifting-rapidly.html">defines</a> forcible rape as vaginal penetration of a female victim without her consent and by use of force. The Bureau tracks forcible rapes of female victims annually in their <a href="http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-4">Uniform Crime Report</a>. </p><p>BuzzFeed compared 2011&#39;s state-by-state statistics per 100,000 people with the punishments that each state imposes for the crime. The findings were alarming. The places with stricter punishments had the most rapes. This may be a product of laws catching up to the frequency of the crime in the states where it&#39;s most prevalent. But the laws apparently haven&#39;t yet done their job.</p>











 
 
 
	<h1>Higher fines are associated with higher rates of rape.</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/4/22/10/enhanced-buzz-26567-1366639676-10.jpg" width="625" height="419" alt="Higher fines are associated with higher rates of rape." /></p>
 
	<p>Only 3 states and DC have fines of at least six figures. There are 10 states with lesser fines and 37 states without any clear fine at all.</p>











 
 
 
	<h1>So are longer sentences.</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/4/22/10/enhanced-buzz-26517-1366639695-9.jpg" width="625" height="417" alt="So are longer sentences." /></p>
 
	<p>20 states and DC are committed to giving a life sentence for forcible rape. 14 more give out more than 20 years, and 11 others give less than that. There are only 5 without any minimum sentence.</p>











 
 
 
	<h1>As are stricter residency requirements when rapists are released.</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/22/10/enhanced-buzz-29230-1366639735-20.jpg" width="625" height="418" alt="As are stricter residency requirements when rapists are released." /></p>
 
	<p>Residency requirements in many states prohibit released rapists from living near schools, parks, churches, and many other places where children may be found. There are 6 states that require more than a football field of separation, and 10 that require less. 35 states don&#39;t have any restrictions at all.</p>






<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/harsher-laws-dont-mean-fewer-sex-crimes">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/harsher-laws-dont-mean-fewer-sex-crimes</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:09:49 -0400</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;The states with the most severe punishments for rape also have the highest rates of the crime.&#x3C;/b&#x3E; A BuzzFeed original analysis.</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">jakel11</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr06/2013/4/22/11/harsher-laws-dont-mean-fewer-sex-crimes-1-4456-1366643388-0.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content isDefault="true">
    <media:description type="html">After the conviction of the Steubenville rapists and the suicide of Rehtaeh Parsons after her alleged rape, it&#x27;s natural to look for a way to keep crimes like these from happening to anyone else. But disturbingly, making the punishments harsher does not seem to be the answer. 

We looked at the &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.arte-sana.com/articles/rape_statutes.pdf&#x22;&#x3E;punishments&#x3C;/a&#x3E; that each state doles out in response to forcible rape. The FBI &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/24/us/definition-of-rape-is-shifting-rapidly.html&#x22;&#x3E;defines&#x3C;/a&#x3E; forcible rape as vaginal penetration of a female victim without her consent and by use of force. The Bureau tracks forcible rapes of female victims annually in their &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-4&#x22;&#x3E;Uniform Crime Report&#x3C;/a&#x3E;. 

BuzzFeed compared 2011&#x26;#39;s state-by-state statistics per 100,000 people with the punishments that each state imposes for the crime. The findings were alarming. The places with stricter punishments had the most rapes. This may be a product of laws catching up to the frequency of the crime in the states where it&#x26;#39;s most prevalent. But the laws apparently haven&#x26;#39;t yet done their job.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="419" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/4/22/10/enhanced-buzz-26567-1366639676-10.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">Only 3 states and DC have fines of at least six figures. There are 10 states with lesser fines and 37 states without any clear fine at all.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="417" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/4/22/10/enhanced-buzz-26517-1366639695-9.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">20 states and DC are committed to giving a life sentence for forcible rape. 14 more give out more than 20 years, and 11 others give less than that. There are only 5 without any minimum sentence.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="418" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/22/10/enhanced-buzz-29230-1366639735-20.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">Residency requirements in many states prohibit released rapists from living near schools, parks, churches, and many other places where children may be found. There are 6 states that require more than a football field of separation, and 10 that require less. 35 states don&#x26;#39;t have any restrictions at all.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Munchies Capitals Of America</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/the-munchies-capitals-of-america</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>These cities pack good munchies and cannabis culture together to make your 4/20 complete. San Francisco tops BuzzFeed&#8217;s list.</p>




 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/20/9/enhanced-buzz-30543-1366465099-6.jpg" width="625" height="591" alt="" /></p>
 
	


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="Design by John Gara for BuzzFeed" class="">Design by John Gara for BuzzFeed</a></small></p>









 <p>Smoke and a pancake? Bong and a blintz? BuzzFeed broke down to best places to get high and follow it up with the best gourmet munchies.</p><p>We mapped out how <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/04/19/420-celebrations-americas-pot-smoking-capitals.html">The Daily Beast's Pot-Smoking Capitals</a> rank on <a href="http://www.travelandleisure.com/articles/americas-best-cities-for-foodies/2">Travel + Leisure&#39;s list of the Best Cities for Foodies</a>. The weed ranks we extracted were based on The Daily Beast&#39;s "Pot Culture" statistic, using their overall rank as a tie-breaker. Below, our top five Munchies Capitals of America, in reverse order.</p>











 
 
 
	<h1>5. Boston, MA</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/19/11/enhanced-buzz-17504-1366386170-20.jpg" width="625" height="469" alt="5. Boston, MA" /></p>
 
	<p>Boston&#39;s weed culture is a 9/10, and they&#39;re #23 on the foodie list.</p>


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_D1xUzpiOMdw/TH_9MMS3X9I/AAAAAAAAABw/M5asAb2SuJw/s1600/welcome+picture.jpg" class="">1.bp.blogspot.com</a></small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>4. New York City, NY</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/4/19/11/enhanced-buzz-13092-1366386472-6.jpg" width="625" height="353" alt="4. New York City, NY" /></p>
 
	<p>No need to settle for Doritos when you&#39;ve got an entire city full of world-class restaurants at your fingertips &mdash; there&#39;s even a <a href="http://ny.eater.com/archives/2012/04/12_new_stoner_foods_in_new_york_city.php">guide</a> to the best stoner dishes in New York. Weed culture there is only 5/10, but the food is #4.</p>


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wallpaperium.com/wp-content/uploads/New-York-Central_Park.jpg" class="">wallpaperium.com</a></small></p>




<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/the-munchies-capitals-of-america">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/the-munchies-capitals-of-america</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 09:58:17 -0400</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;These cities pack good munchies and cannabis culture together to make your 4/20 complete.&#x3C;/b&#x3E; San Francisco tops BuzzFeed&#x26;#39;s list.</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">jakel11</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr03/2013/4/20/9/the-munchies-capitals-of-america-1-26866-1366466296-8.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content height="591" isDefault="true" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/20/9/enhanced-buzz-30543-1366465099-6.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">Smoke and a pancake? Bong and a blintz? BuzzFeed broke down to best places to get high and follow it up with the best gourmet munchies.

We mapped out how &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/04/19/420-celebrations-americas-pot-smoking-capitals.html&#x22;&#x3E;The Daily Beast&#x27;s Pot-Smoking Capitals&#x3C;/a&#x3E; rank on &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.travelandleisure.com/articles/americas-best-cities-for-foodies/2&#x22;&#x3E;Travel + Leisure&#x26;#39;s list of the Best Cities for Foodies&#x3C;/a&#x3E;. The weed ranks we extracted were based on The Daily Beast&#x26;#39;s &#x22;Pot Culture&#x22; statistic, using their overall rank as a tie-breaker. Below, our top five Munchies Capitals of America, in reverse order.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="469" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/19/11/enhanced-buzz-17504-1366386170-20.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">Boston&#x26;#39;s weed culture is a 9/10, and they&#x26;#39;re #23 on the foodie list.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="353" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/4/19/11/enhanced-buzz-13092-1366386472-6.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">No need to settle for Doritos when you&#x26;#39;ve got an entire city full of world-class restaurants at your fingertips &#x26;mdash; there&#x26;#39;s even a &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://ny.eater.com/archives/2012/04/12_new_stoner_foods_in_new_york_city.php&#x22;&#x3E;guide&#x3C;/a&#x3E; to the best stoner dishes in New York. Weed culture there is only 5/10, but the food is #4.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="469" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/19/11/enhanced-buzz-18258-1366386685-7.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">There must be some kind of magical air current on the west coast that mixes with the soil and makes the best herb &#x26;mdash; it&#x26;#39;s very &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.script-o-rama.com/movie_scripts/p/pineapple-express-script-transcript.html&#x22;&#x3E;scientific.&#x3C;/a&#x3E; Weed culture is 9/10. Foodie rank is #6.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="351" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/19/12/enhanced-buzz-17073-1366387339-36.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">Weed culture 10/10. Foodie rank #7. And home to the finest fish market in all the land.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="417" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/4/19/12/enhanced-buzz-13370-1366387860-20.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">The Mecca for cannasseurs and foodies alike. The city by the Bay sets the standard for cannabis culture with a perfect 10/10. They&#x26;#39;re also #2 in terms of eats.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
<item>
<title>BuzzFeed&#x27;s Elite 10 Smart Party Schools</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/buzzfeeds-elite-10-smart-party-schools</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>These ten colleges won BuzzFeed&#8217;s ranking of the best schools in the country for both partying and studying.</p>




 
 
 
	<h1>University of Virginia</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/9/14/enhanced-buzz-22149-1365531441-8.jpg" width="500" height="442" alt="University of Virginia" /></p>
 
	<p>BuzzFeed <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/the-smartest-party-schools-in-the-country">used</a> Fiesta Frog&#39;s <a href="http://www.fiestafrog.com/blog/top-party-schools-universities-2012-party-schools-nightlife/">party schools list</a> and Forbes&#39;s <a href="http://www.forbes.com/top-colleges/list/#page:1_sort:0_direction:asc_search:_filter:All%20states">academic rankings</a> to find the schools that are best for both partying and studying. Virginia ranked #22 in partying and #36 in academics, for the best combined total.</p>


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="Mike Ingalls for TheSabre.com" class="">Mike Ingalls for TheSabre.com</a> &nbsp;/&nbsp; via: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.thesabre.com" class="">thesabre.com</a></small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>University of North Carolina</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/4/9/12/enhanced-buzz-1162-1365525828-7.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="University of North Carolina" /></p>
 
	<p>Party rank: 25<br />Academic rank: 47</p>


 <p><small>Via: Streeter Lecka / Getty Images</small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>Colgate University</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr05/2013/4/9/12/enhanced-buzz-11541-1365526042-9.jpg" width="500" height="331" alt="Colgate University" /></p>
 
	<p>Party rank: 31<br />Academic rank: 48</p>


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="Paul Swaney" class="">Paul Swaney</a> &nbsp;/&nbsp; via: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.stadiumjourney.com/stadiums/cotterell-court-s757/images" class="">stadiumjourney.com</a></small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>Vanderbilt University</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr05/2013/4/9/12/enhanced-buzz-11669-1365526275-22.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Vanderbilt University" /></p>
 
	<p>Party rank: 60<br />Academic rank: 33</p>


 <p><small>Via: Joe Robbins / Getty Images</small></p>




<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/buzzfeeds-elite-10-smart-party-schools">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/buzzfeeds-elite-10-smart-party-schools</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:29:10 -0400</pubDate>
<media:content isDefault="true">
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;These ten colleges won BuzzFeed&#x26;#39;s &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/the-smartest-party-schools-in-the-country&#x22;&#x3E;ranking&#x3C;/a&#x3E; of the best schools in the country for both partying and studying.&#x3C;/b&#x3E;</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">annanorth</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr06/2013/4/9/14/buzzfeeds-elite-10-smart-party-schools-1-22149-1365532149-10.jpg" width="125" />
</media:content>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Smartest Party Schools In The Country</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/the-smartest-party-schools-in-the-country</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>These colleges take working hard and playing hard very seriously.</p>




 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/9/10/enhanced-buzz-4654-1365518713-13.jpg" width="625" height="691" alt="" /></p>
 
	<p>BuzzFeed mapped out where most of <a href="http://www.fiestafrog.com/blog/top-party-schools-universities-2012-party-schools-nightlife/">Fiesta Frog&#39;s "Top 100 Schools To Party At"</a> stand on <a href="http://www.forbes.com/top-colleges/list/#page:1_sort:0_direction:asc_search:_filter:All%20states"><i>Forbes</i>&#39; "America&#39;s Top Colleges" list</a>. Looks like the people who party the most (near the top of the graph) know how to crack a book once in a while too. The lower half of the party list does seem to have a few slackers, though.</p>


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="Design by John Gara for BuzzFeed" class="">Design by John Gara for BuzzFeed</a></small></p>









 
 
 
	

	<p>And the winners, for most combined partying prowess and academic rigor: </p><p>1. University of Virginia (#22 party &amp; #36 academic). <br />2. University of North Carolina (#25 party &amp; #47 academic). <br />3. Colgate University (#31 party &amp; #48 academic).</p>
   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/4/4/10/enhanced-buzz-5131-1365087389-5.jpg" width="560" height="420" alt="" /></p>
 


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.campusexplorer.com/colleges/9643D69F/Virginia/Charlottesville/University-of-Virginia/photos-videos/" class="">campusexplorer.com</a></small></p>









 <p><a href="http://www.collegeatlas.org/top-party-schools.html">The Princeton Review published lists</a> for schools that study most, study least, drink least, and more. We compared this with the <i>Forbes</i> and Fiesta Frog lists:</p>











 
 
 
	

	<p>Only Harvey Mudd College in Claremont, California, was able to "study most" and make <i>Forbes</i>&#39; top 100 while still placing on Fiesta Frog&#39;s party list.</p>
   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/4/11/enhanced-buzz-31112-1365088084-18.jpg" width="625" height="417" alt="" /></p>
 


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://onedublin.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/harvey-mudd-college-campus-2.jpg" class="">onedublin.files.wordpress.com</a></small></p>




<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/the-smartest-party-schools-in-the-country">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/the-smartest-party-schools-in-the-country</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 08:22:38 -0400</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;These colleges take working hard &#x3C;i&#x3E;and&#x3C;/i&#x3E; playing hard very seriously.&#x3C;/b&#x3E;</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">jakel11</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr06/2013/4/9/10/the-smartest-party-schools-in-the-country-1-4623-1365518718-2.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content height="691" isDefault="true" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/9/10/enhanced-buzz-4654-1365518713-13.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">BuzzFeed mapped out where most of &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.fiestafrog.com/blog/top-party-schools-universities-2012-party-schools-nightlife/&#x22;&#x3E;Fiesta Frog&#x26;#39;s &#x22;Top 100 Schools To Party At&#x22;&#x3C;/a&#x3E; stand on &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.forbes.com/top-colleges/list/#page:1_sort:0_direction:asc_search:_filter:All%20states&#x22;&#x3E;&#x3C;i&#x3E;Forbes&#x3C;/i&#x3E;&#x26;#39; &#x22;America&#x26;#39;s Top Colleges&#x22; list&#x3C;/a&#x3E;. Looks like the people who party the most (near the top of the graph) know how to crack a book once in a while too. The lower half of the party list does seem to have a few slackers, though.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="420" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/4/4/10/enhanced-buzz-5131-1365087389-5.jpg" width="560">
    <media:description type="html">And the winners, for most combined partying prowess and academic rigor: 

1. University of Virginia (#22 party &#x26;amp; #36 academic). 
2. University of North Carolina (#25 party &#x26;amp; #47 academic). 
3. Colgate University (#31 party &#x26;amp; #48 academic).</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">&#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.collegeatlas.org/top-party-schools.html&#x22;&#x3E;The Princeton Review published lists&#x3C;/a&#x3E; for schools that study most, study least, drink least, and more. We compared this with the &#x3C;i&#x3E;Forbes&#x3C;/i&#x3E; and Fiesta Frog lists:</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="417" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/4/11/enhanced-buzz-31112-1365088084-18.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">Only Harvey Mudd College in Claremont, California, was able to &#x22;study most&#x22; and make &#x3C;i&#x3E;Forbes&#x3C;/i&#x3E;&#x26;#39; top 100 while still placing on Fiesta Frog&#x26;#39;s party list.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="332" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/4/11/enhanced-buzz-9085-1365088495-8.jpg" width="498">
    <media:description type="html">Apparently, those Florida Gators lazed their way into &#x3C;i&#x3E;Forbes&#x3C;/i&#x3E;&#x26;#39; rankings while partying hard and avoiding any books: University of Florida students made the Princeton Review&#x26;#39;s lists for drinking the most beer and studying the least, while still making Forbes&#x26;#39;s top 100.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="358" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/4/4/11/enhanced-buzz-4630-1365088590-31.jpg" width="550">
    <media:description type="html">Not partying does not necessarily mean you study. Only the U.S. Military Academy, U.S. Coast Guard Academy, and Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering drank the least and studied the most.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Complete Breakdown Of Sex On &#x22;Game Of Thrones&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/janelk/a-complete-breakdown-of-sex-on-game-of-thrones</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>Where it happened, whether someone paid for it, who was naked (spoiler: mostly women), and more. A BuzzFeed original analysis.</p>




 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/3/14/enhanced-buzz-27932-1365013854-1.jpg" width="625" height="606" alt="" /></p>
 
	











 <p>BuzzFeed analyzed the scripts of the first two seasons of <i>Game of Thrones</i> to find out who had sex, where, and under what circumstances. The result: paid sex is very common, and King's Landing is the most sexually active place. The two seasons featured one scene of sex between siblings and one of betrothal-breaking sex &mdash; Robb Stark sleeping with Talisa despite being promised to someone else. And indeed, women are over three times more likely to be naked in a sex scene than <a href="http://www.vulture.com/2013/03/plea-for-more-male-nudity-on-game-of-thrones.html">men are</a> &mdash; 17 sex scenes featured female nudity, while only 5 had naked men.</p>












]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/janelk/a-complete-breakdown-of-sex-on-game-of-thrones</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 12:03:43 -0400</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;Where it happened, whether someone paid for it, who was naked (spoiler: mostly women), and more.&#x3C;/b&#x3E; A BuzzFeed original analysis.</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">janelk</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr05/2013/4/3/14/a-complete-breakdown-of-sex-on-game-of-thrones-1-20533-1365013885-10.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content height="606" isDefault="true" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/4/3/14/enhanced-buzz-27932-1365013854-1.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">BuzzFeed analyzed the scripts of the first two seasons of &#x3C;i&#x3E;Game of Thrones&#x3C;/i&#x3E; to find out who had sex, where, and under what circumstances. The result: paid sex is very common, and King&#x27;s Landing is the most sexually active place. The two seasons featured one scene of sex between siblings and one of betrothal-breaking sex &#x26;mdash; Robb Stark sleeping with Talisa despite being promised to someone else. And indeed, women are over three times more likely to be naked in a sex scene than &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.vulture.com/2013/03/plea-for-more-male-nudity-on-game-of-thrones.html&#x22;&#x3E;men are&#x3C;/a&#x3E; &#x26;mdash; 17 sex scenes featured female nudity, while only 5 had naked men.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
<item>
<title>5 &#x22;Game Of Thrones&#x22; Predictions From Past Seasons&#x27; Trends</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/5-game-of-thrones-predictions-from-past-seasons-trends</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>The rise of the Lannisters, a decline in direwolves, and more &mdash; BuzzFeed analyzed the scripts from the first two seasons for indications of things to come.</p>




 <p>BuzzFeed collected and scrutinized every script from the first twenty episodes of HBO's hit series <i>Game of Thrones</i>. The goal: to find trends in the mention of Houses, creatures and other elements of the show in order to predict what&#39;s going to happen in the highly anticipated season 3, premiering March 31. </p><p>Why look <a href="http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/recap-game-of-thrones-thrillingly-closes-out-season-two-with-songs-of-ice-fire-20120604">into the flames</a> when you can look at the data? Read on for some (spoiler-free) expectations!</p>











 
 
 
	<h1>1. More dragons, fewer direwolves.</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/29/15/enhanced-buzz-31431-1364586100-24.jpg" width="625" height="450" alt="1. More dragons, fewer direwolves." /></p>
 
	<p>Faithful viewers won&#39;t be surprised by the spikes BuzzFeed found in the mentions of dragons. Especially given the <a href="http://www.hbo.com/game-of-thrones/index.html#/game-of-thrones/about/video/season-3-extended-trailer.html/eNrjcmbOYM5nLtQsy0xJzXfMS8ypLMlMds7PK0mtKFHPz0mBCQUkpqf6JeamcjIyskknlpbkF+QkVtqWFJWmsjGyMQIAWCcXOA==">trailers</a> we&#39;ve seen so far, expect even more in season 3. On the other hand, white walkers and direwolves dropped off in season 2. While you can expect the mysterious humanoids from north of the Wall to play a bigger role than ever based on the end of season 2, direwolves seem to be on the outs with one dead and another lost in the woods.</p>











 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr05/2013/3/29/18/enhanced-buzz-28631-1364594860-9.jpg" width="625" height="352" alt="" /></p>
 
	


 <p><small>Via: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vvallpaper.net/2011/11/emilia-clarke-daenerys-targaryen-game.html" class="">vvallpaper.net</a></small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>2. A decrease in the influence of lords &mdash; and their swords.</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/29/15/enhanced-buzz-31066-1364587056-14.jpg" width="625" height="449" alt="2. A decrease in the influence of lords &amp;mdash; and their swords." /></p>
 
	<p>We saw a decrease in the use of the words "Lord" and "sword" from season one to two. It can probably be explained by the increasing frequency of magical entities &mdash; swords and titles mean nothing in the face of dragons and walking corpses. Look for these drop-offs to persist as the fantastical aspects of the series gain steam.</p>






<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/5-game-of-thrones-predictions-from-past-seasons-trends">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/5-game-of-thrones-predictions-from-past-seasons-trends</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:26:34 -0400</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;The rise of the Lannisters, a decline in direwolves, and more &#x26;mdash; BuzzFeed analyzed the scripts from the first two seasons for indications of things to come.&#x3C;/b&#x3E;</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">jakel11</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr06/2013/3/29/18/5-game-of-thrones-predictions-from-past-seasons-t-1-30933-1364595993-8.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content isDefault="true">
    <media:description type="html">BuzzFeed collected and scrutinized every script from the first twenty episodes of HBO&#x27;s hit series &#x3C;i&#x3E;Game of Thrones&#x3C;/i&#x3E;. The goal: to find trends in the mention of Houses, creatures and other elements of the show in order to predict what&#x26;#39;s going to happen in the highly anticipated season 3, premiering March 31. 

Why look &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/recap-game-of-thrones-thrillingly-closes-out-season-two-with-songs-of-ice-fire-20120604&#x22;&#x3E;into the flames&#x3C;/a&#x3E; when you can look at the data? Read on for some (spoiler-free) expectations!</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="450" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/29/15/enhanced-buzz-31431-1364586100-24.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">Faithful viewers won&#x26;#39;t be surprised by the spikes BuzzFeed found in the mentions of dragons. Especially given the &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.hbo.com/game-of-thrones/index.html#/game-of-thrones/about/video/season-3-extended-trailer.html/eNrjcmbOYM5nLtQsy0xJzXfMS8ypLMlMds7PK0mtKFHPz0mBCQUkpqf6JeamcjIyskknlpbkF+QkVtqWFJWmsjGyMQIAWCcXOA==&#x22;&#x3E;trailers&#x3C;/a&#x3E; we&#x26;#39;ve seen so far, expect even more in season 3. On the other hand, white walkers and direwolves dropped off in season 2. While you can expect the mysterious humanoids from north of the Wall to play a bigger role than ever based on the end of season 2, direwolves seem to be on the outs with one dead and another lost in the woods.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="352" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr05/2013/3/29/18/enhanced-buzz-28631-1364594860-9.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="449" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/29/15/enhanced-buzz-31066-1364587056-14.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">We saw a decrease in the use of the words &#x22;Lord&#x22; and &#x22;sword&#x22; from season one to two. It can probably be explained by the increasing frequency of magical entities &#x26;mdash; swords and titles mean nothing in the face of dragons and walking corpses. Look for these drop-offs to persist as the fantastical aspects of the series gain steam.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="417" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/29/18/enhanced-buzz-787-1364595177-6.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="344" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/3/29/17/enhanced-buzz-30933-1364593442-2.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">The term &#x22;wildling&#x22; has been used to define those north of the Wall 33 times so far in the show. &#x22;Free Folk&#x22; has been used once. We predict those numbers beginning to even out as Jon Snow gets up close and personal with Ygritte, The Lord of Bones, and Mance Rayder.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="415" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/29/16/enhanced-buzz-31421-1364587587-12.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="451" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/3/29/16/enhanced-buzz-18407-1364588174-7.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">The mentions of House Stark started to fall off a bit in the second season (which isn&#x26;#39;t surprising after the loss of their patriarch). While they will still have a prominent role, the Starks may continue to lose the spotlight in season 3. 

This paves the way for some extra conversation about the Lannisters and everyone&#x26;#39;s favorite abusive child-king. The pride of Lions has gone through peaks and valleys in the first 20 episodes, but they are due for another spike during the coming season.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="352" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/3/29/18/enhanced-buzz-7379-1364594469-7.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="451" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/29/16/enhanced-buzz-31415-1364588873-16.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">House Arryn has had its day. After a large role in season 1, the nobles of the Vale basically fell out of a sky cell. It&#x26;#39;s hard to see neurotic Lysa and whiny Robin stretching their wings and taking flight again. 

There are a few other houses that we should see more of, particularly those of Tyrell and Martell. Margaery Tyrell was only a Queen for a portion of last season, but she&#x26;#39;s already in a new King&#x26;#39;s court and going for seconds. Expect the Rose&#x26;#39;s stock to rise along with the Lion&#x26;#39;s. Same goes for the Martells, since they&#x26;#39;ll be housing Princess Myrcella Lannister, much to Cersei&#x26;#39;s chagrin.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="351" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr06/2013/3/29/18/enhanced-buzz-30336-1364594584-5.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x27;90s TV Families Were Totally Broke</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/leonoraepstein/90s-tv-families-were-totally-broke</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>There&#8217;s no way could the 7th Heaven family could have gotten by on a minister&#8217;s salary. A BuzzFeed original analysis of the finances of five TV families.</p>




 <p>Just how realistic were the financial scenarios of our favorite TV families? Your best guess is the right one: not very. However, certain shows gave us an illusion of plausibility thanks to likable, supposedly "modest" set-ups. With some help from our BuzzFeed data team, we were able to take a general look at five TV families to see what their finances might have been like.</p>











 
 
 
	<h1>"7th Heaven"</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/26/10/enhanced-buzz-23725-1364307503-1.jpg" width="450" height="338" alt="&quot;7th Heaven&quot;" /></p>
 
	<p><b>Place:</b> "Glen Oak," CA<br /><b>Aired:</b> 1996-2007<br /><b>Background</b>: OMG, living in this house must have been <i>the worst</i>. The Camden Family, lorded over by minister Eric Camden, started out with five children, until the twins were born in third season, bringing the household tally up two adults and seven children for a total of 9 under one roof. As a stay-at-home mom, Annie didn&#39;t bring in much income, so the family relied fully on Eric&#39;s salary. They had certain economic advantages &mdash; the house would have presumably been paid for by the church; the kids seemed to have attended public high school (although Ruthie had a very brief stint at private school). As the story progresses, certain of the Camden kids do go nearby colleges, however most of them hold down jobs at the same time so it would be safe to assume (considering the family&#39;s size and traditional ethics) that the kids were expected to take out loans and work through school to support themselves.</p>


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://bi.kotek.pl/bloxlite/f640x640/70/14/3812ebd4ef.jpg" class="">bi.kotek.pl</a></small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>"7th Heaven" Financial Summary</h1>

	<p>The Camdens were losing a buttload of money each year.</p>
   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/3/26/14/enhanced-buzz-22516-1364322452-4.jpg" width="625" height="101" alt="&quot;7th Heaven&quot; Financial Summary" /></p>
 











 
 
 
	<h1>"Full House"</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/26/11/enhanced-buzz-29628-1364313522-0.jpg" width="625" height="469" alt="&quot;Full House&quot;" /></p>
 
	<p><b>Place:</b> San Francisco, CA<br /><b>Aired:</b> 1987-1995<br /><b>Background</b>: As the host of local news show <i>Wake Up, San Francisco</i>, Danny Tanner probably made a pretty decent living as a local celebrity. However, supporting three children without a full second income (mom was deceased), plus adding two additional household members (Uncles Jesse and Joey) would have brought additional costs. Although Jesse and Joey worked, it&#39;s safe to say that the incomes from their chosen careers &mdash; rock star, voice actor, and "advertising agency" &mdash; probably didn&#39;t contribute much to the household budget. Jesse seemed to "contribute" more by offering childcare, while Joey seemed slightly more responsible (and therefore more likely to pay for groceries and household items more often).</p>


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://thrifteye.com/2011/07" class="">thrifteye.com</a></small></p>




<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/leonoraepstein/90s-tv-families-were-totally-broke">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/leonoraepstein/90s-tv-families-were-totally-broke</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:22:13 -0400</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;There&#x26;#39;s no way could the &#x3C;i&#x3E;7th Heaven&#x3C;/i&#x3E; family could have gotten by on a minister&#x26;#39;s salary.&#x3C;/b&#x3E; A BuzzFeed original analysis of the finances of five TV families.</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">leonoraepstein</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr02/2013/3/26/14/90s-tv-families-were-totally-broke-1-13614-1364323977-5.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content isDefault="true">
    <media:description type="html">Just how realistic were the financial scenarios of our favorite TV families? Your best guess is the right one: not very. However, certain shows gave us an illusion of plausibility thanks to likable, supposedly &#x22;modest&#x22; set-ups. With some help from our BuzzFeed data team, we were able to take a general look at five TV families to see what their finances might have been like.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="338" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/26/10/enhanced-buzz-23725-1364307503-1.jpg" width="450">
    <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;Place:&#x3C;/b&#x3E; &#x22;Glen Oak,&#x22; CA
&#x3C;b&#x3E;Aired:&#x3C;/b&#x3E; 1996-2007
&#x3C;b&#x3E;Background&#x3C;/b&#x3E;: OMG, living in this house must have been &#x3C;i&#x3E;the worst&#x3C;/i&#x3E;. The Camden Family, lorded over by minister Eric Camden, started out with five children, until the twins were born in third season, bringing the household tally up two adults and seven children for a total of 9 under one roof. As a stay-at-home mom, Annie didn&#x26;#39;t bring in much income, so the family relied fully on Eric&#x26;#39;s salary. They had certain economic advantages &#x26;mdash; the house would have presumably been paid for by the church; the kids seemed to have attended public high school (although Ruthie had a very brief stint at private school). As the story progresses, certain of the Camden kids do go nearby colleges, however most of them hold down jobs at the same time so it would be safe to assume (considering the family&#x26;#39;s size and traditional ethics) that the kids were expected to take out loans and work through school to support themselves.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="101" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/3/26/14/enhanced-buzz-22516-1364322452-4.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">The Camdens were losing a buttload of money each year.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="469" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/26/11/enhanced-buzz-29628-1364313522-0.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;Place:&#x3C;/b&#x3E; San Francisco, CA
&#x3C;b&#x3E;Aired:&#x3C;/b&#x3E; 1987-1995
&#x3C;b&#x3E;Background&#x3C;/b&#x3E;: As the host of local news show &#x3C;i&#x3E;Wake Up, San Francisco&#x3C;/i&#x3E;, Danny Tanner probably made a pretty decent living as a local celebrity. However, supporting three children without a full second income (mom was deceased), plus adding two additional household members (Uncles Jesse and Joey) would have brought additional costs. Although Jesse and Joey worked, it&#x26;#39;s safe to say that the incomes from their chosen careers &#x26;mdash; rock star, voice actor, and &#x22;advertising agency&#x22; &#x26;mdash; probably didn&#x26;#39;t contribute much to the household budget. Jesse seemed to &#x22;contribute&#x22; more by offering childcare, while Joey seemed slightly more responsible (and therefore more likely to pay for groceries and household items more often).</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="158" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/26/14/enhanced-buzz-18721-1364321563-6.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="375" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/26/12/enhanced-buzz-29684-1364314108-7.jpg" width="500">
    <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;Place&#x3C;/b&#x3E;: Port Washington, WI
&#x3C;b&#x3E;Aired&#x3C;/b&#x3E;: 1991-1997
&#x3C;b&#x3E;Background&#x3C;/b&#x3E;: The Lambert-Foster clan may have looked like an average, modest family, but their gang of children would have been hard to support. Living in a Milwaukee suburb in a comfortable home, Frank was a contractor while Carol supposedly brought in income from her sleepy, in-home salon. Together, they were supporting six kids, plus Cody (although he lived in a van in the driveway).</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="102" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/26/14/enhanced-buzz-6515-1364321587-2.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="500" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/26/12/enhanced-buzz-20473-1364314859-20.jpg" width="500">
    <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;Place&#x3C;/b&#x3E;: New York, NY
&#x3C;b&#x3E;Aired&#x3C;/b&#x3E;: 1993-1999
&#x3C;b&#x3E;Background&#x3C;/b&#x3E;: The Sheffields were supposedly very well off. They lived in an Upper East Side townhouse; all three children attended private school; and the family was able to afford a live-in nanny and butler. The family&#x26;#39;s only income came from the father, Maxwell, a &#x22;moderately successful&#x22; Broadway producer. It&#x26;#39;s hard to gauge what, exactly, that would mean in terms of finances, but assuming he did okay, we&#x26;#39;ll give him the benefit of the doubt that he makes much more than the &#x22;average TV producer,&#x22; which would be &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Executive_Producer%2c_Television_Productions/Salary#by_State&#x22;&#x3E;about $113k&#x3C;/a&#x3E;. Let&#x26;#39;s say he brings in five times that, so $565,000.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="146" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/26/14/enhanced-buzz-5964-1364321624-3.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="400" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/26/12/enhanced-buzz-9540-1364316837-0.jpg" width="536">
    <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;Place&#x3C;/b&#x3E;: Brooklyn, NY
&#x3C;b&#x3E;Aired&#x3C;/b&#x3E;: 1984-1992
&#x3C;b&#x3E;Background&#x3C;/b&#x3E;: The Huxtables were supposed to be a solidly upper-middle-class clan with two highly educated parents (a doctor and a lawyer) bringing in two nice incomes. Again, owning a home and having a gazillion kids (including ones who go off to fancy colleges) takes a toll on their finances.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="122" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/26/14/enhanced-buzz-5687-1364321639-10.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">Looking at the show&#x26;#39;s scenario as it was in 1986.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">A few notes:

1. All dollar amounts are in 2011 dollars, adjusted for inflation. 
2. We researched salaries by state on &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.payscale.com&#x22;&#x3E;payscale.com&#x3C;/a&#x3E;, taking the median result.
3. The cost of living was determined by taking &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.census.gov/statab/hist/HS-34.pdf&#x22;&#x3E;total expenditures provided by Census data&#x3C;/a&#x3E;, subtracting housing (mortgage), and dividing by the population. Then multiplying by the number of household members in a given scenario.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
<item>
<title>7 Tips For Picking Your Bracket If You Know Nothing About Basketball</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/7-tips-for-picking-your-bracket-if-you-know-nothing-about-ba</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>Go ahead and pick teams by mascots or colors, but put a little science behind it. A BuzzFeed original analysis of the last 15 NCAA tournaments.</p>




 
 
 
	<h1>Evil mascots beat good ones.</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/20/18/enhanced-buzz-22150-1363817633-5.jpg" width="625" height="467" alt="Evil mascots beat good ones." /></p>
 
	<p>We broke down school <a href="http://www.slackcat.com/football/mascot/list/mascot">mascots</a> into 8 categories: birds, reptiles, mammals, insects, colors, nature-related, evil beings, and people which included local culture related stuff. The evil beings beat the people category 71% of the time. So if an evil-mascot team is matched up against a person-mascot team, you know what to do.</p>


 <p><small>Via: Streeter Lecka / Getty Images</small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>Reptiles are also a good bet.</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/20/18/enhanced-buzz-16554-1363818055-0.jpg" width="625" height="553" alt="Reptiles are also a good bet." /></p>
 
	<p>Reptiles also beat up on the people 75% of the time. And they came up victorious against mammals 70% of the time. Other mascot trends that occurred about 60% of the time include birds bombing nature; colors over mammals; evil consuming mammals and reptiles; mammals, insects and nature trouncing people; and mammals eating insects.</p>


 <p><small>Via: Andy Lyons / Getty Images</small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>Don't bet on the Ivy League.</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/20/17/enhanced-buzz-12375-1363814814-11.jpg" width="625" height="436" alt="Don't bet on the Ivy League." /></p>
 
	<p>Some conferences, like the Ivy League, have a somewhat dismal history. Check the charts below to see which conferences have stalled out, and where, over the last 15 years.</p>


 <p><small>Via: Elise Amendola, File / AP</small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>So, in the last 15 years...</h1>

	
   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/20/13/enhanced-buzz-10628-1363800631-10.jpg" width="494" height="1161" alt="So, in the last 15 years..." /></p>
 






<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/7-tips-for-picking-your-bracket-if-you-know-nothing-about-ba">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/7-tips-for-picking-your-bracket-if-you-know-nothing-about-ba</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:41:18 -0400</pubDate>
<media:content isDefault="true">
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;Go ahead and pick teams by mascots or colors, but put a little science behind it.&#x3C;/b&#x3E; A BuzzFeed original analysis of the last 15 NCAA tournaments.</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">jakel11</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr01/2013/3/21/11/7-tips-for-picking-your-bracket-if-you-know-nothi-1-24800-1363880454-17.jpg" width="125" />
</media:content>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Best Cities To Celebrate St. Patrick&#x27;s Day</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/best-cities-to-celebrate-st-patricks-day</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>Find out which cities are drunkest, most Irish, and most committed to their St. Patrick&#8217;s Day parades.</p>




 
 
 
	<h1>Where To Get Drunk</h1>

	<p>The cities with the biggest circles have the most bar crawls, according to data from <a href="http://pubcrawls.com/index.php">PubCrawls.com.</a></p>
   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/3/16/12/enhanced-buzz-22224-1363451094-5.jpg" width="625" height="361" alt="Where To Get Drunk" /></p>
 











 
 
 
	<h1>Where To Kiss An Irish Person</h1>

	<p>Cities with the biggest circles have the biggest percentage of Irish-American residents.</p>
   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/16/12/enhanced-buzz-31597-1363452143-10.jpg" width="625" height="365" alt="Where To Kiss An Irish Person" /></p>
 


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="Population data via Wikipedia" class="">Population data via Wikipedia</a></small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>Where To Watch A Parade</h1>

	<p>These cities have the oldest St. Patrick&#39;s Day parades. We can&#39;t vouch for their coolness, but at least you know they&#39;re committed.</p>
   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/15/18/enhanced-buzz-27239-1363385199-0.jpg" width="461" height="767" alt="Where To Watch A Parade" /></p>
 


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="Parade data via Wikipedia" class="">Parade data via Wikipedia</a></small></p>










]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/best-cities-to-celebrate-st-patricks-day</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 12:32:20 -0400</pubDate>
<media:content isDefault="true">
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;Find out which cities are drunkest, most Irish, and most committed to their St. Patrick&#x26;#39;s Day parades.&#x3C;/b&#x3E;</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">annanorth</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr02/2013/3/16/12/the-best-cities-to-celebrate-st-patricks-day-1-32197-1363452226-6.jpg" width="125" />
</media:content>
</item>
<item>
<title>Short, Fat Guys Are Overrated &#x2014; And Other Observations From A Big-Ass Study Of Football Recruiting</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/short-fat-guys-are-overrated-and-other-observations-from-a-b</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>We&#8217;re in that football void between national college signing day and the NFL draft. How many of those high school stars will turn their potential into a pro career?</p>




 <p>It's the time of the football year for speculating about potential &mdash; while fans of college teams rejoice/mope about their incoming freshman classes after last month&#39;s national signing day, NFL obsessives are studying combine results in anticipation of April&#39;s draft. But how many of this year&#39;s top graduating high school players will be NFL caliber four years from now? With a hat tip to Matt Hinton&#39;s annual analysis of <a href="http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/blog/eye-on-college-football/21641769/">recruiting rankings and college success</a>, we compiled a big pile of data on how recruits fared in their efforts to make the pros, tracking all the players ranked by Rivals.com, generally thought of as the most reliable recruiting site, between 2002 and 2009. (Players from later classes aren&#39;t yet eligible to play in the league. <a href="http://www.rivals.com/aboutrankings.asp?Sport=1">All FBS players</a> are accounted for in the rankings.) Here&#39;s some of what we found.</p>











 
 
 
	<h1>The Rankings Are, Overall, Reliable. But...</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/13/11/enhanced-buzz-21093-1363189595-18.jpg" width="625" height="479" alt="The Rankings Are, Overall, Reliable. But..." /></p>
 
	











 <p>No big surprises here. The chart looks about how you'd expect: a few extremely low- and high-ranked players with a lot of middling prospects in the...middle. And the rankings, taken broadly, perform well &mdash; each recruiting tier outperforms those below it. But there&#39;s something a little off about the five-stars.</p>











 
 
 
	<h1>...Five-Star Recruits Aren&#39;t That Much Better Than Four-Star Recruits</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/13/11/enhanced-buzz-30102-1363189553-10.jpg" width="625" height="380" alt="...Five-Star Recruits Aren&amp;#39;t That Much Better Than Four-Star Recruits" /></p>
 
	


 <p><small></small></p>




<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/short-fat-guys-are-overrated-and-other-observations-from-a-b">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/short-fat-guys-are-overrated-and-other-observations-from-a-b</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:06:19 -0400</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;We&#x26;#39;re in that football void between national college signing day and the NFL draft.&#x3C;/b&#x3E; How many of those high school stars will turn their potential into a pro career?</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">jakel11</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr03/2013/3/13/16/short-fat-guys-are-overrated-and-other-observatio-1-395-1363205914-12.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content isDefault="true">
    <media:description type="html">It&#x27;s the time of the football year for speculating about potential &#x26;mdash; while fans of college teams rejoice/mope about their incoming freshman classes after last month&#x26;#39;s national signing day, NFL obsessives are studying combine results in anticipation of April&#x26;#39;s draft. But how many of this year&#x26;#39;s top graduating high school players will be NFL caliber four years from now? With a hat tip to Matt Hinton&#x26;#39;s annual analysis of &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/blog/eye-on-college-football/21641769/&#x22;&#x3E;recruiting rankings and college success&#x3C;/a&#x3E;, we compiled a big pile of data on how recruits fared in their efforts to make the pros, tracking all the players ranked by Rivals.com, generally thought of as the most reliable recruiting site, between 2002 and 2009. (Players from later classes aren&#x26;#39;t yet eligible to play in the league. &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.rivals.com/aboutrankings.asp?Sport=1&#x22;&#x3E;All FBS players&#x3C;/a&#x3E; are accounted for in the rankings.) Here&#x26;#39;s some of what we found.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="479" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/13/11/enhanced-buzz-21093-1363189595-18.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">No big surprises here. The chart looks about how you&#x27;d expect: a few extremely low- and high-ranked players with a lot of middling prospects in the...middle. And the rankings, taken broadly, perform well &#x26;mdash; each recruiting tier outperforms those below it. But there&#x26;#39;s something a little off about the five-stars.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="380" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/13/11/enhanced-buzz-30102-1363189553-10.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">Rivals and the other rating services hand out very few five-star ratings. In our sample, there were 2,410 four-stars and 279 five-stars &#x26;mdash; more than eight times as many of the former. But, as indicated above, five-star prospects only made the NFL twice as often as four-stars. It doesn&#x27;t look like there&#x26;#39;s actually as much difference between four- and five-star recruits as their relative scarcity would imply.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="426" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/13/11/enhanced-buzz-30224-1363189503-8.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">Ideally, the breakdown of rated high school recruits by position would mirror that of the players in the NFL &#x26;mdash; the stated goal of these recruiting services is not to evaluate how good a player was in high school, but to project how likely he is to make the NFL and identify the pro position he&#x27;s most suited for. But in our sample 6.7% of Rivals&#x26;#39; ranked players were quarterbacks, even though 4.5% of NFL players play QB. At the same time, only 15.5% of ranked Rivals players were offensive linemen, while the O-line positions account for 18.1% of roster spots in the NFL. (Running backs are also overrepresented, while defensive backs and tight ends are underrepresented.)

(We considered that this might actually be the fault of college coaches overstocking certain positions &#x26;mdash; Rivals gives a rating to anyone an FBS coach gives a scholarship to &#x26;mdash; but it turns out that the positional skewing of three- to five-star prospects, i.e., the ones Rivals think most highly of, is pretty much the same as the positional skewing in the chart of all players above.) 

Some of this is unsurprising &#x26;mdash; the best athletes at a given high school often play quarterback and running back, switching to a different position (often defensive back) before or during college, so it makes sense that those players would show up disproportionately. Meanwhile, tight ends might be a unique case because...</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="412" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/13/11/enhanced-buzz-30224-1363189484-6.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">The bars above indicate the portion of four- and five-star recruits (the cream of the crop) at a given position that eventually make an NFL roster. The portion is lower for quarterbacks than it is for any other position; meanwhile, more than 30% of top high school tight end prospects go pro, the highest percentage of any position group. There are only five five-star tight ends in our sample, and all of them &#x26;mdash; Greg Olsen, Kyle Rudolph, Marcedes Lewis, Martellus Bennet, and Tony Hills Jr. &#x26;mdash; made the NFL. But less-highly rated tight ends do pretty well too...</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="412" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/13/11/enhanced-buzz-21036-1363189281-6.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">This chart highlights the positions at which one- and two-stars &#x26;mdash; the biggest underdogs &#x26;mdash; are least and most likely to make the league. Again, it&#x27;s tough out there for a quarterback, as fewer low-rated QBs succeed than players at any other position. And again, tight ends are in high demand. Thirty of the 372 one- and two-star tight ends &#x26;mdash; players who likely didn&#x26;#39;t receive scholarship offers from any major program &#x26;mdash; in our sample made the pros.

Why do tight ends succeed so disproportionately? Is it that the recent success of tight end&#x26;ndash;driven offenses like New England&#x26;#39;s have caused a run on the position? Is it that the position of tight end naturally attracts hardworking individuals who wash out less than their peers? Is it because Rivals refuses to adequately survey the field of available high school tight ends, their long-standing anti&#x26;ndash;tight end bias driven by a time that a tight end sold them a used Trans Am that turned out not to have brakes, an engine, or a left turn signal? More research is needed, especially into how someone could buy a car without realizing it didn&#x26;#39;t have an engine.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="678" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/3/12/19/enhanced-buzz-29931-1363130171-0.jpg" width="254">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">Only 12 of the 31 five-star defensive ends in our sample have made the pros, the worst performance of any group of five-stars. (With the caveat that some, like Alex Okafor, are draft-eligible but haven&#x27;t yet left school.) (With the secondary caveat that the same is true for every &#x3C;i&#x3E;other&#x3C;/i&#x3E; five-star position group as well.) None have made a Pro Bowl or All-Pro team or won a Super Bowl. With an NFL success rate of 38.71%, five-star defensive ends are barely more reliable than four-star defensive ends, who made the league at a rate of 28.40%, even though they are more than eight times as scarce.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="572" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/13/11/enhanced-buzz-21113-1363189251-8.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">The chart here shows the listed high school height (on the y-axis) and weight (on the x-axis) of every recruit in our sample. The red dots are players that made the pros; the blue dots didn&#x27;t. On the whole, Rivals was highly accurate in selecting players with the right profile to make the league. The average recruit that made the NFL was 6 feet 2 inches and 221 lbs &#x26;mdash; and the average recruit that &#x3C;i&#x3E;didn&#x26;#39;t&#x3C;/i&#x3E; make the NFL was the exact same height and weight.

However! You&#x26;#39;ll notice that among shorter players, there are a lot of blue dots on the right side of the chart. Which means that the heaviest recruits at a given height didn&#x26;#39;t make the NFL. The numbers match the visual: The average weight of recruits 6 feet and under who made the NFL is 185.5 lbs, while recruits 6 feet and under who didn&#x26;#39;t make it all the way weighed an average of 188.1 lbs. Rivals&#x26;#39; pool of players under 6 feet skews heavy. Put another way, no player 6 feet or below and heavier than 245 lbs made the NFL in the period we studied &#x26;mdash; but 30 played FBS football, and Rivals gave eight of them ratings of three stars or better.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;So. What did we screw up?&#x3C;/b&#x3E;This is our first stab at analyzing recruiting rankings (though not our first stab at &#x3C;i&#x3E;obsessing&#x3C;/i&#x3E; about recruiting rankings). Let us know what we might have overlooked in the comments &#x26;mdash; or via email to bml@buzzfeed.com and jake.levy@buzzfeed.com.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
<item>
<title>The 35 Ways You Know You&#x27;re A Michigan Wolverine</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/emilyorley/the-35-ways-you-know-youre-a-michigan-wolverine</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>Bleeding maize and blue.</p>




 
 
 
	<h1>This is your house &mdash; that you share with 114,804 of your closest friends.</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/7/10/enhanced-buzz-22428-1362668607-3.jpg" width="625" height="389" alt="This is your house &amp;mdash; that you share with 114,804 of your closest friends." /></p>
 
	


 <p><small>Via: Molly Riley  / Reuters</small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>This is your "little brother."</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/7/10/enhanced-buzz-12373-1362668504-4.jpg" width="625" height="938" alt="This is your &quot;little brother.&quot;" /></p>
 
	


 <p><small>Via: Paul Battaglia / AP</small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>This man elicits a rage deep inside of you that you didn&#39;t know existed.</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/7/10/enhanced-buzz-21700-1362668426-4.jpg" width="625" height="937" alt="This man elicits a rage deep inside of you that you didn&amp;#39;t know existed." /></p>
 
	


 <p><small>Via: Gene J. Puskar, File / AP</small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>So does this guy (and his sweater vest).</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/3/7/9/enhanced-buzz-23053-1362667559-3.jpg" width="625" height="417" alt="So does this guy (and his sweater vest)." /></p>
 
	


 <p><small>Via: Jamie Sabau / Getty Images</small></p>




<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/emilyorley/the-35-ways-you-know-youre-a-michigan-wolverine">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/emilyorley/the-35-ways-you-know-youre-a-michigan-wolverine</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 12:48:20 -0500</pubDate>
<media:content isDefault="true">
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;Bleeding maize and blue.&#x3C;/b&#x3E;</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">emilyorley</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr03/2013/3/7/16/the-35-ways-you-know-youre-a-michigan-wolverine-1-21317-1362690063-4.jpg" width="125" />
</media:content>
</item>
<item>
<title>The 1% Of Tennis</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/data/the-1-of-tennis-or-17-grand-slammers-and-tenni</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>Novak Djokovic just took down Andy Murray in the Australian Open finals, and we&#8217;ve got tennis on the mind! No better way to start the 2013 season than looking at what happened in the past. Check out what we dug up about the &#8217;30s til now.</p>




 
 
 
	<h1>Grand Slam Wins Across The Globe</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/1/26/2/anigif_enhanced-buzz-22625-1359186815-0.gif" width="600" height="356" alt="Grand Slam Wins Across The Globe" /></p>
 
	<p>Check out where the Grand Slammers from each decade are from!</p>











 
 
 
	<h1>Career Grand Slams by Decade and Country</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/1/25/16/enhanced-buzz-31542-1359150246-11.jpg" width="625" height="155" alt="Career Grand Slams by Decade and Country" /></p>
 
	<p>Only 17 people have ever succeeded in winning each of the four Tennis Grand Slams and achieving a Career Grand Slam. Four of them (S. Williams, Federer, Nadal, &amp; Sharapova) are still active today. Here&#39;s a breakdown of how many your parents and grandparents got to see and where they&#39;re all from.</p>











 
 
 
	<h1>The 17 Career Grand Slammers at the Grand Slams</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/1/25/17/enhanced-buzz-18479-1359153300-10.jpg" width="625" height="386" alt="The 17 Career Grand Slammers at the Grand Slams" /></p>
 
	<p>How dominant can 17 people be?<br />-the left bars show the number of Grand Slams held per decade.<br />-the right bars show the number of wins by Career Grand Slammers.<br />Tennis suffered from WW2 as much as anything. The US Open was the only Grand Slam held each year during the &#39;40s. The 1986 Australian Open didn&#39;t happen because of a schedule change from December to January of &#39;87.</p>











 
 
 
	<h1>Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, &amp; Novak Djokovic vs John McEnroe, Bjorn Borg, &amp; Jimmy Connors: Grand Slams</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/1/25/17/enhanced-buzz-18708-1359154483-6.jpg" width="625" height="267" alt="Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, &amp;amp; Novak Djokovic vs John McEnroe, Bjorn Borg, &amp;amp; Jimmy Connors: Grand Slams" /></p>
 
	<p>We decided to compare today&#39;s big 3 with three stars of the 70&#39;s-80&#39;s. These pie charts breakdown who won Grand Slams when at least one of the trio participated. The old guys won an impressive 72%, but it pales in comparison to the 83% we&#39;ve witnessed in the last 10 years. Helps having Roger who accounts for 43%.</p>






<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/data/the-1-of-tennis-or-17-grand-slammers-and-tenni">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/data/the-1-of-tennis-or-17-grand-slammers-and-tenni</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:02:34 -0500</pubDate>
<media:content isDefault="true">
  <media:description type="html">Novak Djokovic just took down Andy Murray in the Australian Open finals, and we&#x26;#39;ve got tennis on the mind! No better way to start the 2013 season than looking at what happened in the past. Check out what we dug up about the &#x26;#39;30s til now.</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">data</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr02/2013/1/28/12/the-1-of-tennis-1-24602-1359392473-7.jpg" width="125" />
</media:content>
</item>
<item>
<title>Three Things To Expect From The Oscars Acceptance Speeches</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/janelk/three-things-to-expect-from-the-oscars-acceptance-speeches</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>BuzzFeed crunched the data, and the acceptance speech trends are clear.</p>




 
 
 
	<h1>Long Speeches</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/2/22/19/enhanced-buzz-26228-1361580265-8.jpg" width="625" height="495" alt="Long Speeches" /></p>
 
	<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Words_per_minute">Wikipedia</a> says the audience hears best at 150 words spoken per minute, so expect a few of these to break 2 minutes.</p>


 <p><small><span class="bf-editor-source">Via:  <a href="/"></a></span>
    </small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>Filled with thanks...</h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/2/23/17/enhanced-buzz-23761-1361658839-5.jpg" width="625" height="455" alt="Filled with thanks..." /></p>
 
	<p>While the odds are low anyone will come close to the 32 times Halle Berry said &#39;thank&#39;, almost everyone will begin their speech with thanks. Only three speeches since 1972 have omitted &#39;thank&#39;-- John Houseman in 1974, Tom Hanks in 1993, and Juliette Binoche in 1997.</p><p>- Male actors are over <big>2x</big> as likely to thank their agent</p><p>- Female actors are over <big>3x</big> as likely to thank their families</p>


 <p><small><span class="bf-editor-source">Via:  <a href="/"></a></span>
    </small></p>









 
 
 
	<h1>..and sooooo much enthusiasm </h1>

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/2/22/20/enhanced-buzz-18915-1361581378-2.jpg" width="625" height="444" alt="..and sooooo much enthusiasm " /></p>
 
	


 <p><small><span class="bf-editor-source">Via:  <a href="/"></a></span>
    </small></p>









 <p>(<small>Data from the <a href="http://aaspeechesdb.oscars.org/">Academy Awards Acceptance Speech Database</a>.</small>)</p>






<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/janelk/three-things-to-expect-from-the-oscars-acceptance-speeches">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/janelk/three-things-to-expect-from-the-oscars-acceptance-speeches</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:35:17 -0500</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;BuzzFeed crunched the data, and the acceptance speech trends are clear.&#x3C;/b&#x3E;</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">janelk</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr02/2013/2/24/11/three-things-to-expect-from-the-oscars-acceptance-1-28449-1361722917-0.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content height="495" isDefault="true" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/2/22/19/enhanced-buzz-26228-1361580265-8.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">&#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Words_per_minute&#x22;&#x3E;Wikipedia&#x3C;/a&#x3E; says the audience hears best at 150 words spoken per minute, so expect a few of these to break 2 minutes.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="455" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/2/23/17/enhanced-buzz-23761-1361658839-5.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">While the odds are low anyone will come close to the 32 times Halle Berry said &#x26;#39;thank&#x26;#39;, almost everyone will begin their speech with thanks. Only three speeches since 1972 have omitted &#x26;#39;thank&#x26;#39;-- John Houseman in 1974, Tom Hanks in 1993, and Juliette Binoche in 1997.

- Male actors are over &#x3C;big&#x3E;2x&#x3C;/big&#x3E; as likely to thank their agent

- Female actors are over &#x3C;big&#x3E;3x&#x3C;/big&#x3E; as likely to thank their families</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="444" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/2/22/20/enhanced-buzz-18915-1361581378-2.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">(&#x3C;small&#x3E;Data from the &#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://aaspeechesdb.oscars.org/&#x22;&#x3E;Academy Awards Acceptance Speech Database&#x3C;/a&#x3E;.&#x3C;/small&#x3E;)</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
<item>
<title>One Chart Showing How Race Influences Your Chance of Dying from Gun Violence</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/one-chart-showing-how-race-influences-your-chance-of-dying-f</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>A second chart shows who&#8217;s on TV talking about it.</p>




 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/2/12/12/enhanced-buzz-13975-1360689950-3.jpg" width="625" height="390" alt="" /></p>
 
	<p><small>Gun victim data from the 2010 FBI Uniform Crime Report.</small></p>











 <p>The waves of press following recent horrific mass shootings in Connecticut, Colorado, and elsewhere have brought gun violence back onto the national agenda. </p><p>One thing that sometimes gets obscured in the debate, however: The victims of gun violence remain overwhelmingly African-American. Indeed, black people make up just about 13% of the population of the United States &mdash; but more than half of all victims of gun violence. </p><p>Black victims are overwhelmingly killed by handguns, and the congressional focus on semi-automatic rifles has no obvious connection to the violence plaguing cities like Chicago.</p><p>One factor in the intense focus on white victims may be who is leading the conversation. Here's a snapshot of the people talking about guns on cable news between January 29 and February 5:</p>











 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/2/12/12/enhanced-buzz-14881-1360689969-3.jpg" width="625" height="382" alt="" /></p>
 
	











 <p>(Data on cable news pertains to January 29, 2013 to February 5, 2013. In that period, 68% of the reporters and guests on MSNBC talking about guns were white; 78% on CNN; and 93% on Fox.)</p>






<hr /><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/one-chart-showing-how-race-influences-your-chance-of-dying-f">View Entire List &rsaquo;</a></p>





]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/one-chart-showing-how-race-influences-your-chance-of-dying-f</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:41:30 -0500</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;A second chart shows who&#x26;#39;s on TV talking about it.&#x3C;/b&#x3E;</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">jakel11</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr02/2013/2/12/13/one-chart-showing-how-race-influences-your-chance-1-12025-1360692852-0.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content height="390" isDefault="true" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/2/12/12/enhanced-buzz-13975-1360689950-3.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">&#x3C;small&#x3E;Gun victim data from the 2010 FBI Uniform Crime Report.&#x3C;/small&#x3E;</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">The waves of press following recent horrific mass shootings in Connecticut, Colorado, and elsewhere have brought gun violence back onto the national agenda. 

One thing that sometimes gets obscured in the debate, however: The victims of gun violence remain overwhelmingly African-American. Indeed, black people make up just about 13% of the population of the United States &#x26;mdash; but more than half of all victims of gun violence. 

Black victims are overwhelmingly killed by handguns, and the congressional focus on semi-automatic rifles has no obvious connection to the violence plaguing cities like Chicago.

One factor in the intense focus on white victims may be who is leading the conversation. Here&#x27;s a snapshot of the people talking about guns on cable news between January 29 and February 5:</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content height="382" isDefault="false" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/2/12/12/enhanced-buzz-14881-1360689969-3.jpg" width="625">
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">(Data on cable news pertains to January 29, 2013 to February 5, 2013. In that period, 68% of the reporters and guests on MSNBC talking about guns were white; 78% on CNN; and 93% on Fox.)</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
<item>
<title>How Different Guns Kill Black, White, And Hispanic Americans Unequally</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/how-different-guns-kill-black-white-and-hispanic-americans-u</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>FBI data show striking contrasts between the race of victims of handgun, shotgun and rifle murders. A BuzzFeed original analysis.</p>




 
 
 
	

   <p><img src="http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/2/6/12/enhanced-buzz-6019-1360172853-0.jpg" width="625" height="316" alt="" /></p>
 
	<p><i>Design by Chris Ritter</i></p>


 <p><small>Source:&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010" class="">fbi.gov</a></small></p>









 <p>The massacre in Newtown, Connecticut. last month set off a national debate over regulating military-style rifles and other guns.</p><p>But not all Americans fall victim to gun violence equally &mdash; or to the same guns. African-Americans are far more likely to be victims of gun murders than any other group &mdash; they make up 57% of all gun murders, according to FBI figures analyzed by BuzzFeed. Handgun victims, over all, were 60% black and 27% white. </p><p>And handguns are by far the most common murder weapon, killing 89% of all gun murder victims in the country.</p><p>Other guns take a different set of victims. Shotgun victims showed the opposite pattern: 30% black and 60% white. </p><p>And rifles, the weapons that are currently the focus of attention from media and lawmakers, victimized white and black people nearly equally.</p><p>This data was pulled from the 2010 FBI Uniform Crime Report.</p>












]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/jakel11/how-different-guns-kill-black-white-and-hispanic-americans-u</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:30:58 -0500</pubDate>
<media:group>
  <media:description type="html">&#x3C;b&#x3E;FBI data show striking contrasts between the race of victims of handgun, shotgun and rifle murders.&#x3C;/b&#x3E; A BuzzFeed original analysis.</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">jakel11</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/webdr03/2013/2/6/20/how-different-guns-kill-black-white-and-hispanic--1-16654-1360200802-0.jpg" width="125" />
  <media:content height="316" isDefault="true" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/2/6/12/enhanced-buzz-6019-1360172853-0.jpg" width="625">
    <media:description type="html">&#x3C;i&#x3E;Design by Chris Ritter&#x3C;/i&#x3E;</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
  <media:content isDefault="false">
    <media:description type="html">The massacre in Newtown, Connecticut. last month set off a national debate over regulating military-style rifles and other guns.

But not all Americans fall victim to gun violence equally &#x26;mdash; or to the same guns. African-Americans are far more likely to be victims of gun murders than any other group &#x26;mdash; they make up 57% of all gun murders, according to FBI figures analyzed by BuzzFeed. Handgun victims, over all, were 60% black and 27% white. 

And handguns are by far the most common murder weapon, killing 89% of all gun murder victims in the country.

Other guns take a different set of victims. Shotgun victims showed the opposite pattern: 30% black and 60% white. 

And rifles, the weapons that are currently the focus of attention from media and lawmakers, victimized white and black people nearly equally.

This data was pulled from the 2010 FBI Uniform Crime Report.</media:description>
    <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">nonadult</media:rating>
  </media:content>
</media:group>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>