this qualifies as clever. ok…very clever. the problem with it is this. it’s so goddam fucking stupid, it’s hard to believe that any ‘scholar’ would want to be associated with it. beyond that, i would further describe it as theologically cheesy. beyond that, i would get right down to the real nitty-gritty…and say something like…”this is for entertainment purposes only, as it seeks to advance the thought of a continuum borne strictly of a psyche lost in the wonderland of it’s own dementia, seeking further to expound upon words never uttered, by persons who never existed. and thus it falls squarely in line with the horribly ununified thinking of it’s robotic and flat out ‘stupid’ body of adherents…known as christians.” that’s right!!! let’s just tell it like it is!!! is there some reason not to? christians should expect to receive what they have given. they deserve all the disrespect that can be heaped upon their godforsaken (ha ha), and malignant existence. their need to ‘spread the word’, given them by themselves, is so base, and vile, and ugly, and utterly without merit, and so poorly disguised, as to warrant this and other like comments. the story of jesus is so profoundly bufoonish, and is so easily trounced et al, that they should retreat in a state of grossly self-induced shame, to those dead sea caves…wherein they can fuck each other over, and ponder the merits of drivel such as this.
i hope this comment serves to cause at least one person to laugh. i can do better, but this is all i’m good for right now, and in all candor…’better’ is not called for.
