“In every example, the women drawn from self-descriptions are uglier than those drawn from a stranger’s description.” Do you see what’s wrong with this statement?
The drawing is good and all but the character design just looks like a man in his 50s-60’s who just got a fresh modern haircut. I don’t want Luke Skywalker to look like some old model for men’s shirts.
I would wear almost all of these gladly <3
Wikipedia is your friend. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slut-shaming
No. Remove it. That remake is just pure art theft and now that guy has his own signature (and of course art) on something horrible that he doesn’t stand for AT ALL.
“But that’s ridiculous.
Taylor Swift doesn’t have some political agenda to push.
She’s literally just singing about her life and her feelings.” Is this supposed to be a proper argument about how she isn’t guilty of slut shaming and etc in her songs? Because hey, you can like her and her music all you want, but don’t do it blindly.
“But you’re not just going to stop a blond, for example, in the street and ask if they’re a natural.” Not true, I live in fucking SWEDEN and even I have experienced this more than once. This isn’t any hate towards this article I just wanted to point this out. Brunette is probably a better example.
Hi, you should really not use that first comic where a person gets cookies, because the version you used is a stolen and “remade” version of it’s original that you’ll find here: http://superqueerartsyblog.tumblr.com/post/41390625304/about-9gag-sexism-and-my-art As you can see the artist who made it has had a lot of problems with anonymous idiots on the internet turning his comic into some sexist bullshit.
Going by your logic, from now on you aren’t aloud to ever get offended, sad or angry because there’s always someone who has it worse than you do.