i don’t know why you americans are so offended. most american girls start dating at what age like 11 or something. you start advertising at like 8.

I don’t think how anything past the first two photos can be taken as sexual, unless you are really reaching. Stop being so scared of a child’s skin, I do think many people are being prudes about this.

Hey guys, crazy idea here, but maybe she enjoys doing this? and it’s not all about exploitation? alot of these pictures are only as sexy as you perceive them. I think she looks pretty and maybe even fierce in a 10-year-old way. well except for that last one.

Gross.

could use a boob job

What? No Pedobear photo!? Yall disappoint me.

A lot of these are taken out of context. None of them are sexualising and the ones of her in lipstick and high fashion are from Vogue Paris and she is with two other girls - the shoot is showcasing how we try to make kids look too old and women try to look too young. A few of those, being out of context may seem somewhat sexualised but are not worth the fuss the media is making, they are from vogue enfant and in-case you closed minded sexually repressed americans didn’t know, over in europe, nobody would bat and eye at this because it is silly and not worth such a media storm. All of those minus the 1st two are from vogue enfant.  Same bullshit here ‘this makes pedos’ as ‘video games corrupts youth’ well fuck that. Parents corrupt youths and a pedo is a pedo, access to pictures or not.  Also, why are we making a fuss over this when America has ‘Toddlers in Tiaras’. Start fixing issues at home before turning uneducated attention elsewhere. /rant tl;dr toddlers in tiaras is worse

She’s a beautiful girl. and if she likes modelling for VOGUE CHILDREN,well i don’t see anything wrong.

i honestly don’t see the problem. none of these pictures seem overtly sexualized.

The last picture did it for me, its extremely disturbing. And yes a pedo’s wet dream. In my personal opinion little girls definitely don’t need to be modeling THIS WAY. Take the kids in things like old navy for example or even Target and Kmart. The only normal pictures here for a child is 5, 6, 8, 9, maybe 10. Pardon me if I seem a bit conservative or over dramatic about this? But I worry about how children are portrayed and the predators that lurk.

She’s a stunning girl, but she’ll be just as stunning when she’s 18. Perhaps her parents could (temporarily retire the cash cow) pull the plug until then. Maybe she’ll actually grow into those shoes by then.

It really makes me sad because this could definitely lead to her suffering from an eating disorder. And the last picture….no. Just no. So wrong. I agree with whoever said something about “pedo dreams” or something…esp the pic with her holding the doll. Yes, she is a beautiful girl, but to be a supermodel at 10 years old? Let her live her life and learn about her body by herself. And no, I don’t mean that in a dirty way. Let the pretty girl live a normal life.

She is very pretty. The only thing I don’t like is the “come hither” look in some of the photos and the shirtless one at the end. Beads over boobs is for toddlers and Mardi Gras patrons IMO

Why don’t you have a seat over there?
—Chris Hansen I think the fact that Vogue-worthy “sexy lady” shoes don’t come in her size (she looks like she’s playing dress-up with mommy’s shoes) shows how abnormal this is.

“Do you want it straight, or broken?”

jaded

THe issue is called VOGUE CHILDREN.
So what’s the big whoop?
They are not using her in an adult mag to sell women’s clothes.
It’s called ‘dress up’ We just loves us our manufactured stories while we sink into the SECOND great depression.

Ten? She looks like a tall five. Either way, not cool.

the last one was ridiculous. however, the majority is a cute little french girl being a cute little girl. we are so used to seeing women dressed in baby-doll dresses and trying to evoke pedo-fantasies that when we see a child donning the same outfits we get confused.