thank you

Ok, there are sensible answers to (very nearly) all of these questions. I guess i must be bored to read this and respond, but sorry, though i am sure it is meant to be meaningless drivel, it is really too heavy on the drivel… seems like something the legendary fictional hack, kenny banya would write.

The Football Association Premier League is a league of professional football (i.e., soccer) teams in the United Kingdom. The games played by its members are videotaped, and the League owns copyrights in those tapes. The League then licenses pay TV stations throughout Europe to broadcast those tapes, using encrypted satellite signals that can be viewed only by those who have satellite-TV receivers and decoder cards. Each broadcaster’s decoder card will decode only its own encrypted signals. And the Premier League’s license agreements prohibit broadcasters outside the UK from selling their decoder cards to viewers in the UK. This is done to prevent UK football fans from watching Premier League matches on television, instead of attending games while they are being played. Nevertheless, several pubs in the UK have been able to purchase decoder cards from Greece that enable the pubs to view the Greek satellite broadcasts of Premier League matches, as they are being played, because the satellite signals of the Greek broadcaster spill over into the UK. The Premier League has sued those pubs, and the companies that sold them Greek decoder cards, for copyright infringement. The pubs and decoder card sellers are defending the case by arguing that the EEC Treaty entitles them to do what they have done.
•Do you think that this case is about the performance of television programming, and thus is controlled by the Coditel decision, so the Premier League will win? Or …
•Do you think that this case is about the sale of decoder cards, and thus this case is controlled by Deutsch Grammophon and Musik Vertrieb, so the pubs and the companies from which they bought decoder cards will win?
(Note: A trial on this very question began in London on April 15, 2008; but the court had not yet announced its decision, as this book went to press. The case is The Football Association Premier League Limited v. QC Leisure, Case No: IHC 695/07. A decision is likely by the time we discuss this chapter in class.)

so hot

can't find a good picture but he really looks like rickety cricket from it's always sunny in philadelphia

this works because these people are very semetrical

forget that transformer jay leno stuff… i will be her boyfriend… that bia is foine

apostrophes have tons of uses and we DO need them, and it is not the punctuation mark's (see!) fault that people are too dumb to use 'em correctly!!