Computer science as an intellectual (male) activity
To understand how the gap between men and women started to appear in the STEM field, we have to take a look at history. Judith Lorber's piece "Believing is Seeing: Biology as Ideology" reveals how computer science went from a female clerical task to a male intellectual work. In the 1940s, women were hired as computer programmers because it resembled an office job. But this job demanded complex skills, such as abstract critical thinking, mathematics, and knowledge about electricity and machinery. However, once this field was attractive to men, it became more male-dominated and a male activity. By the 1960s, the field was already divided: men would take the more skill-demanded jobs (and earn more money) while women would take the less skill-demanded jobs (and earn less money). But, now there are many computer science jobs that women can take. In an article in San Jose Mercury News, Mike Cassidy says that the economy is creating far more computer science jobs but there are not as many computer science graduates to hold these positions. He is aware that women are a minority in the computer science field and believes that this is a great opportunity for women to be part of a well-paid field. As more women are called to hold these positions, this movement resembles the one during World War II when women were becoming part of the workforce. This "Rosie the Riveter moment" may be the first steps to a solution that would close the gap between men and women in STEM jobs.
Lorber, Judith. "Believing is Seeing: Biology as Ideology." Gender & Society 7.4 (1993): 568-581. Print.
Ruining girls’ development with stereotype threat
The “leaky pipeline” in STEM majors and careers
It’s a man’s job
Society pressures women to choose stereotypical careers for them, such as education and nursing, and pressures men to choose a career in the STEM field. In Lisa DiDonato and JoNell Strough's article "Do College Students' Gender-typed Attitudes About Occupations Predict Their Real-World Decisions?" a study reveals women and men choose their majors and careers because of stereotypes. These studies also reveals a deeper understanding in the gender gap in the STEM field. For college women, attitudes about stereotypes limits them to enter into the STEM majors because they have been traditionally male-dominated. Even though women are more open to hold masculine jobs, there are many barriers that restricts women from entering to this field. This restriction leads women to hold less-paid positions and with limited benefits. Their attitude toward the STEM field is influenced by society and the media and discourages them to pursue a STEM career. In a blog post in Quintessential Careers, they describe the advantages and disadvantages of pursuing a career in a non-traditional (stereotypical) job. The article emphasizes that women can benefit from the STEM jobs because they would get paid more and have more experience. Even though both men and women hold non-traditional careers, they are both following their dreams and passions to defeat all the stereotypes that society has placed in their careers.
DiDonato, Lisa, and JoNell Strough. "Do College Students' Gender-typed Attitudes About Occupations Predict Their Real-World Decisions?" Sex Roles 68.9-10 (2013): 536-549. Print.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11199-013-0275-2
Helping minorities to become successful
After exploring the theoretical reasons why women are underrepresented in the STEM field, we also need to explore how racial minorities are included in the mix. Lisa Tsui's article "Effective Strategies to Increase Diversity in STEM Fields: A Review of the Research Literature" shows a list of methods that help the racial minorities in the STEM field to succeed in it. She focuses on education of teenagers so they can pursue a degree in STEM field. Not only women are underrepresented in the field; African American, Latino and Native American students compromise 11% of the STEM occupations. Socioeconomic, cultural, structural and institutional factors may be the reason why these students do not participate in STEM field careers. Another reason why these students are not prone to choose these careers is because of their level of education. Compared to White or Asian students, these students' level of mathematics and academics are not really high. Many actions have been taken to place these students into the college-readiness level so they can succeed in the STEM programs. Summer Bridge programs are programs for low-income and minority students to help them get ready in math, science and engineering courses for college. Pairing these students with a mentor has also shown effective results. Since they are paired with someone that may have gone through the same experiences as the student, the connection will be easy and responsive. All of these helps are just for the benefit of the students so they can succeed in the field. In an article in Diverse, increasing the diversity in STEM fields would create an outstanding number of jobs. It says that the racial gap in the STEM field might be contributed to the economic inequality that racial minorities have to encounter. Increasing the diversity in this field would not only close the racial gap in the field, but also the socioeconomic gap that these minorities have to deal with. Encouraging these minority students to become successful would have a greater impact in the future.
Tsui, Lisa. "Effective Strategies to Increase Diversity in STEM Fields: A Review of the Research Literature." The Journal of Negro Education 76.4 (2007): 555-581. Print.
National call for diversity
The (failed?) American Dream
Women’s slow entry into academies of science
Now that we have talked about the reasons of both gender and racial gaps in the STEM field, we need to talk about how minorities (in this case, women) have become part of the science field. Greta Noordenbos's article "Women in Academies of Sciences: From Exclusion to Exception" gives us an insight to how women have been slowly added to the academies of science. The Scientific Revolution gave women a chance to work in science with their male family members. Even though women attributed to many scientific discoveries, they were not selected to be part of these prestigious academies. Their exclusion from the academies was due to women's exclusion from higher-learning education, a small number of available seats of the academies, and the domestication of women to do feminine tasks. The number of women in these academies and universities increased after World War II and this movement might have started by progressive male scientists that believed that women had exceptional abilities in the scientific field. The author ends that women will have equal opportunities to succeed in the field when women have equal chances to become part of the academies of science. To test your knowledge about women in science and math, take this quiz. This quiz will let you know that people don't know as much about women's contributions to science in history. A reason why we may have scored low is because we had never seen these names before in a science book (except Marie Curie's name and contributions). With limited rights these women made many contributions to science and changed history at the same time.
Noordenbos, Greta. "Women in academies of sciences: From exclusion to exception." Women's Studies International Forum 25.1 (2002): 127-137. Print.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539502002157#